aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/spartan/core/ml/eqsubst.ML
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'spartan/core/ml/eqsubst.ML')
-rw-r--r--spartan/core/ml/eqsubst.ML434
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 434 deletions
diff --git a/spartan/core/ml/eqsubst.ML b/spartan/core/ml/eqsubst.ML
deleted file mode 100644
index ea6f098..0000000
--- a/spartan/core/ml/eqsubst.ML
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,434 +0,0 @@
-(* Title: eqsubst.ML
- Author: Lucas Dixon, University of Edinburgh
- Modified: Joshua Chen, University of Innsbruck
-
-Perform a substitution using an equation.
-
-This code is slightly modified from the original at Tools/eqsubst..ML,
-to incorporate auto-typechecking for type theory.
-*)
-
-signature EQSUBST =
-sig
- type match =
- ((indexname * (sort * typ)) list (* type instantiations *)
- * (indexname * (typ * term)) list) (* term instantiations *)
- * (string * typ) list (* fake named type abs env *)
- * (string * typ) list (* type abs env *)
- * term (* outer term *)
-
- type searchinfo =
- Proof.context
- * int (* maxidx *)
- * Zipper.T (* focusterm to search under *)
-
- datatype 'a skipseq = SkipMore of int | SkipSeq of 'a Seq.seq Seq.seq
-
- val skip_first_asm_occs_search: ('a -> 'b -> 'c Seq.seq Seq.seq) -> 'a -> int -> 'b -> 'c skipseq
- val skip_first_occs_search: int -> ('a -> 'b -> 'c Seq.seq Seq.seq) -> 'a -> 'b -> 'c Seq.seq
- val skipto_skipseq: int -> 'a Seq.seq Seq.seq -> 'a skipseq
-
- (* tactics *)
- val eqsubst_asm_tac: Proof.context -> int list -> thm list -> int -> tactic
- val eqsubst_asm_tac': Proof.context ->
- (searchinfo -> int -> term -> match skipseq) -> int -> thm -> int -> tactic
- val eqsubst_tac: Proof.context ->
- int list -> (* list of occurrences to rewrite, use [0] for any *)
- thm list -> int -> tactic
- val eqsubst_tac': Proof.context ->
- (searchinfo -> term -> match Seq.seq) (* search function *)
- -> thm (* equation theorem to rewrite with *)
- -> int (* subgoal number in goal theorem *)
- -> thm (* goal theorem *)
- -> thm Seq.seq (* rewritten goal theorem *)
-
- (* search for substitutions *)
- val valid_match_start: Zipper.T -> bool
- val search_lr_all: Zipper.T -> Zipper.T Seq.seq
- val search_lr_valid: (Zipper.T -> bool) -> Zipper.T -> Zipper.T Seq.seq
- val searchf_lr_unify_all: searchinfo -> term -> match Seq.seq Seq.seq
- val searchf_lr_unify_valid: searchinfo -> term -> match Seq.seq Seq.seq
- val searchf_bt_unify_valid: searchinfo -> term -> match Seq.seq Seq.seq
-end;
-
-structure EqSubst: EQSUBST =
-struct
-
-(* changes object "=" to meta "==" which prepares a given rewrite rule *)
-fun prep_meta_eq ctxt =
- Simplifier.mksimps ctxt #> map Drule.zero_var_indexes;
-
-(* make free vars into schematic vars with index zero *)
-fun unfix_frees frees =
- fold (K (Thm.forall_elim_var 0)) frees o Drule.forall_intr_list frees;
-
-
-type match =
- ((indexname * (sort * typ)) list (* type instantiations *)
- * (indexname * (typ * term)) list) (* term instantiations *)
- * (string * typ) list (* fake named type abs env *)
- * (string * typ) list (* type abs env *)
- * term; (* outer term *)
-
-type searchinfo =
- Proof.context
- * int (* maxidx *)
- * Zipper.T; (* focusterm to search under *)
-
-
-(* skipping non-empty sub-sequences but when we reach the end
- of the seq, remembering how much we have left to skip. *)
-datatype 'a skipseq =
- SkipMore of int |
- SkipSeq of 'a Seq.seq Seq.seq;
-
-(* given a seqseq, skip the first m non-empty seq's, note deficit *)
-fun skipto_skipseq m s =
- let
- fun skip_occs n sq =
- (case Seq.pull sq of
- NONE => SkipMore n
- | SOME (h, t) =>
- (case Seq.pull h of
- NONE => skip_occs n t
- | SOME _ => if n <= 1 then SkipSeq (Seq.cons h t) else skip_occs (n - 1) t))
- in skip_occs m s end;
-
-(* note: outerterm is the taget with the match replaced by a bound
- variable : ie: "P lhs" beocmes "%x. P x"
- insts is the types of instantiations of vars in lhs
- and typinsts is the type instantiations of types in the lhs
- Note: Final rule is the rule lifted into the ontext of the
- taget thm. *)
-fun mk_foo_match mkuptermfunc Ts t =
- let
- val ty = Term.type_of t
- val bigtype = rev (map snd Ts) ---> ty
- fun mk_foo 0 t = t
- | mk_foo i t = mk_foo (i - 1) (t $ (Bound (i - 1)))
- val num_of_bnds = length Ts
- (* foo_term = "fooabs y0 ... yn" where y's are local bounds *)
- val foo_term = mk_foo num_of_bnds (Bound num_of_bnds)
- in Abs ("fooabs", bigtype, mkuptermfunc foo_term) end;
-
-(* T is outer bound vars, n is number of locally bound vars *)
-(* THINK: is order of Ts correct...? or reversed? *)
-fun mk_fake_bound_name n = ":b_" ^ n;
-fun fakefree_badbounds Ts t =
- let val (FakeTs, Ts, newnames) =
- fold_rev (fn (n, ty) => fn (FakeTs, Ts, usednames) =>
- let
- val newname = singleton (Name.variant_list usednames) n
- in
- ((mk_fake_bound_name newname, ty) :: FakeTs,
- (newname, ty) :: Ts,
- newname :: usednames)
- end) Ts ([], [], [])
- in (FakeTs, Ts, Term.subst_bounds (map Free FakeTs, t)) end;
-
-(* before matching we need to fake the bound vars that are missing an
- abstraction. In this function we additionally construct the
- abstraction environment, and an outer context term (with the focus
- abstracted out) for use in rewriting with RW_Inst.rw *)
-fun prep_zipper_match z =
- let
- val t = Zipper.trm z
- val c = Zipper.ctxt z
- val Ts = Zipper.C.nty_ctxt c
- val (FakeTs', Ts', t') = fakefree_badbounds Ts t
- val absterm = mk_foo_match (Zipper.C.apply c) Ts' t'
- in
- (t', (FakeTs', Ts', absterm))
- end;
-
-(* Unification with exception handled *)
-(* given context, max var index, pat, tgt; returns Seq of instantiations *)
-fun clean_unify ctxt ix (a as (pat, tgt)) =
- let
- (* type info will be re-derived, maybe this can be cached
- for efficiency? *)
- val pat_ty = Term.type_of pat;
- val tgt_ty = Term.type_of tgt;
- (* FIXME is it OK to ignore the type instantiation info?
- or should I be using it? *)
- val typs_unify =
- SOME (Sign.typ_unify (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt) (pat_ty, tgt_ty) (Vartab.empty, ix))
- handle Type.TUNIFY => NONE;
- in
- (case typs_unify of
- SOME (typinsttab, ix2) =>
- let
- (* FIXME is it right to throw away the flexes?
- or should I be using them somehow? *)
- fun mk_insts env =
- (Vartab.dest (Envir.type_env env),
- Vartab.dest (Envir.term_env env));
- val initenv =
- Envir.Envir {maxidx = ix2, tenv = Vartab.empty, tyenv = typinsttab};
- val useq = Unify.smash_unifiers (Context.Proof ctxt) [a] initenv
- handle ListPair.UnequalLengths => Seq.empty
- | Term.TERM _ => Seq.empty;
- fun clean_unify' useq () =
- (case (Seq.pull useq) of
- NONE => NONE
- | SOME (h, t) => SOME (mk_insts h, Seq.make (clean_unify' t)))
- handle ListPair.UnequalLengths => NONE
- | Term.TERM _ => NONE;
- in
- (Seq.make (clean_unify' useq))
- end
- | NONE => Seq.empty)
- end;
-
-(* Unification for zippers *)
-(* Note: Ts is a modified version of the original names of the outer
- bound variables. New names have been introduced to make sure they are
- unique w.r.t all names in the term and each other. usednames' is
- oldnames + new names. *)
-fun clean_unify_z ctxt maxidx pat z =
- let val (t, (FakeTs, Ts, absterm)) = prep_zipper_match z in
- Seq.map (fn insts => (insts, FakeTs, Ts, absterm))
- (clean_unify ctxt maxidx (t, pat))
- end;
-
-
-fun bot_left_leaf_of (l $ _) = bot_left_leaf_of l
- | bot_left_leaf_of (Abs (_, _, t)) = bot_left_leaf_of t
- | bot_left_leaf_of x = x;
-
-(* Avoid considering replacing terms which have a var at the head as
- they always succeed trivially, and uninterestingly. *)
-fun valid_match_start z =
- (case bot_left_leaf_of (Zipper.trm z) of
- Var _ => false
- | _ => true);
-
-(* search from top, left to right, then down *)
-val search_lr_all = ZipperSearch.all_bl_ur;
-
-(* search from top, left to right, then down *)
-fun search_lr_valid validf =
- let
- fun sf_valid_td_lr z =
- let val here = if validf z then [Zipper.Here z] else [] in
- (case Zipper.trm z of
- _ $ _ =>
- [Zipper.LookIn (Zipper.move_down_left z)] @ here @
- [Zipper.LookIn (Zipper.move_down_right z)]
- | Abs _ => here @ [Zipper.LookIn (Zipper.move_down_abs z)]
- | _ => here)
- end;
- in Zipper.lzy_search sf_valid_td_lr end;
-
-(* search from bottom to top, left to right *)
-fun search_bt_valid validf =
- let
- fun sf_valid_td_lr z =
- let val here = if validf z then [Zipper.Here z] else [] in
- (case Zipper.trm z of
- _ $ _ =>
- [Zipper.LookIn (Zipper.move_down_left z),
- Zipper.LookIn (Zipper.move_down_right z)] @ here
- | Abs _ => [Zipper.LookIn (Zipper.move_down_abs z)] @ here
- | _ => here)
- end;
- in Zipper.lzy_search sf_valid_td_lr end;
-
-fun searchf_unify_gen f (ctxt, maxidx, z) lhs =
- Seq.map (clean_unify_z ctxt maxidx lhs) (Zipper.limit_apply f z);
-
-(* search all unifications *)
-val searchf_lr_unify_all = searchf_unify_gen search_lr_all;
-
-(* search only for 'valid' unifiers (non abs subterms and non vars) *)
-val searchf_lr_unify_valid = searchf_unify_gen (search_lr_valid valid_match_start);
-
-val searchf_bt_unify_valid = searchf_unify_gen (search_bt_valid valid_match_start);
-
-(* apply a substitution in the conclusion of the theorem *)
-(* cfvs are certified free var placeholders for goal params *)
-(* conclthm is a theorem of for just the conclusion *)
-(* m is instantiation/match information *)
-(* rule is the equation for substitution *)
-fun apply_subst_in_concl ctxt i st (cfvs, conclthm) rule m =
- RW_Inst.rw ctxt m rule conclthm
- |> unfix_frees cfvs
- |> Conv.fconv_rule Drule.beta_eta_conversion
- |> (fn r => resolve_tac ctxt [r] i st);
-
-(* substitute within the conclusion of goal i of gth, using a meta
-equation rule. Note that we assume rule has var indicies zero'd *)
-fun prep_concl_subst ctxt i gth =
- let
- val th = Thm.incr_indexes 1 gth;
- val tgt_term = Thm.prop_of th;
-
- val (fixedbody, fvs) = IsaND.fix_alls_term ctxt i tgt_term;
- val cfvs = rev (map (Thm.cterm_of ctxt) fvs);
-
- val conclterm = Logic.strip_imp_concl fixedbody;
- val conclthm = Thm.trivial (Thm.cterm_of ctxt conclterm);
- val maxidx = Thm.maxidx_of th;
- val ft =
- (Zipper.move_down_right (* ==> *)
- o Zipper.move_down_left (* Trueprop *)
- o Zipper.mktop
- o Thm.prop_of) conclthm
- in
- ((cfvs, conclthm), (ctxt, maxidx, ft))
- end;
-
-(* substitute using an object or meta level equality *)
-fun eqsubst_tac' ctxt searchf instepthm i st =
- let
- val (cvfsconclthm, searchinfo) = prep_concl_subst ctxt i st;
- val stepthms = Seq.of_list (prep_meta_eq ctxt instepthm);
- fun rewrite_with_thm r =
- let val (lhs,_) = Logic.dest_equals (Thm.concl_of r) in
- searchf searchinfo lhs
- |> Seq.maps (apply_subst_in_concl ctxt i st cvfsconclthm r)
- end;
- in stepthms |> Seq.maps rewrite_with_thm end;
-
-
-(* General substitution of multiple occurrences using one of
- the given theorems *)
-
-fun skip_first_occs_search occ srchf sinfo lhs =
- (case skipto_skipseq occ (srchf sinfo lhs) of
- SkipMore _ => Seq.empty
- | SkipSeq ss => Seq.flat ss);
-
-(* The "occs" argument is a list of integers indicating which occurrence
-w.r.t. the search order, to rewrite. Backtracking will also find later
-occurrences, but all earlier ones are skipped. Thus you can use [0] to
-just find all rewrites. *)
-
-fun eqsubst_tac ctxt occs thms i st =
- let val nprems = Thm.nprems_of st in
- if nprems < i then Seq.empty else
- let
- val thmseq = Seq.of_list thms;
- fun apply_occ occ st =
- thmseq |> Seq.maps (fn r =>
- eqsubst_tac' ctxt
- (skip_first_occs_search occ searchf_lr_unify_valid) r
- (i + (Thm.nprems_of st - nprems)) st);
- val sorted_occs = Library.sort (rev_order o int_ord) occs;
- in
- Seq.maps distinct_subgoals_tac (Seq.EVERY (map apply_occ sorted_occs) st)
- end
- end;
-
-
-(* apply a substitution inside assumption j, keeps asm in the same place *)
-fun apply_subst_in_asm ctxt i st rule ((cfvs, j, _, pth),m) =
- let
- val st2 = Thm.rotate_rule (j - 1) i st; (* put premice first *)
- val preelimrule =
- RW_Inst.rw ctxt m rule pth
- |> (Seq.hd o prune_params_tac ctxt)
- |> Thm.permute_prems 0 ~1 (* put old asm first *)
- |> unfix_frees cfvs (* unfix any global params *)
- |> Conv.fconv_rule Drule.beta_eta_conversion; (* normal form *)
- in
- (* ~j because new asm starts at back, thus we subtract 1 *)
- Seq.map (Thm.rotate_rule (~ j) (Thm.nprems_of rule + i))
- (dresolve_tac ctxt [preelimrule] i st2)
- end;
-
-
-(* prepare to substitute within the j'th premise of subgoal i of gth,
-using a meta-level equation. Note that we assume rule has var indicies
-zero'd. Note that we also assume that premt is the j'th premice of
-subgoal i of gth. Note the repetition of work done for each
-assumption, i.e. this can be made more efficient for search over
-multiple assumptions. *)
-fun prep_subst_in_asm ctxt i gth j =
- let
- val th = Thm.incr_indexes 1 gth;
- val tgt_term = Thm.prop_of th;
-
- val (fixedbody, fvs) = IsaND.fix_alls_term ctxt i tgt_term;
- val cfvs = rev (map (Thm.cterm_of ctxt) fvs);
-
- val asmt = nth (Logic.strip_imp_prems fixedbody) (j - 1);
- val asm_nprems = length (Logic.strip_imp_prems asmt);
-
- val pth = Thm.trivial ((Thm.cterm_of ctxt) asmt);
- val maxidx = Thm.maxidx_of th;
-
- val ft =
- (Zipper.move_down_right (* trueprop *)
- o Zipper.mktop
- o Thm.prop_of) pth
- in ((cfvs, j, asm_nprems, pth), (ctxt, maxidx, ft)) end;
-
-(* prepare subst in every possible assumption *)
-fun prep_subst_in_asms ctxt i gth =
- map (prep_subst_in_asm ctxt i gth)
- ((fn l => Library.upto (1, length l))
- (Logic.prems_of_goal (Thm.prop_of gth) i));
-
-
-(* substitute in an assumption using an object or meta level equality *)
-fun eqsubst_asm_tac' ctxt searchf skipocc instepthm i st =
- let
- val asmpreps = prep_subst_in_asms ctxt i st;
- val stepthms = Seq.of_list (prep_meta_eq ctxt instepthm);
- fun rewrite_with_thm r =
- let
- val (lhs,_) = Logic.dest_equals (Thm.concl_of r);
- fun occ_search occ [] = Seq.empty
- | occ_search occ ((asminfo, searchinfo)::moreasms) =
- (case searchf searchinfo occ lhs of
- SkipMore i => occ_search i moreasms
- | SkipSeq ss =>
- Seq.append (Seq.map (Library.pair asminfo) (Seq.flat ss))
- (occ_search 1 moreasms)) (* find later substs also *)
- in
- occ_search skipocc asmpreps |> Seq.maps (apply_subst_in_asm ctxt i st r)
- end;
- in stepthms |> Seq.maps rewrite_with_thm end;
-
-
-fun skip_first_asm_occs_search searchf sinfo occ lhs =
- skipto_skipseq occ (searchf sinfo lhs);
-
-fun eqsubst_asm_tac ctxt occs thms i st =
- let val nprems = Thm.nprems_of st in
- if nprems < i then Seq.empty
- else
- let
- val thmseq = Seq.of_list thms;
- fun apply_occ occ st =
- thmseq |> Seq.maps (fn r =>
- eqsubst_asm_tac' ctxt
- (skip_first_asm_occs_search searchf_lr_unify_valid) occ r
- (i + (Thm.nprems_of st - nprems)) st);
- val sorted_occs = Library.sort (rev_order o int_ord) occs;
- in
- Seq.maps distinct_subgoals_tac (Seq.EVERY (map apply_occ sorted_occs) st)
- end
- end;
-
-(* combination method that takes a flag (true indicates that subst
- should be done to an assumption, false = apply to the conclusion of
- the goal) as well as the theorems to use *)
-val _ =
- Theory.setup
- (Method.setup \<^binding>\<open>sub\<close>
- (Scan.lift (Args.mode "asm" -- Scan.optional (Args.parens (Scan.repeat Parse.nat)) [0]) --
- Attrib.thms >> (fn ((asm, occs), inthms) => fn ctxt =>
- SIMPLE_METHOD' ((if asm then eqsubst_asm_tac else eqsubst_tac) ctxt occs inthms)))
- "single-step substitution"
- #>
- (Method.setup \<^binding>\<open>subst\<close>
- (Scan.lift (Args.mode "asm" -- Scan.optional (Args.parens (Scan.repeat Parse.nat)) [0]) --
- Attrib.thms >> (fn ((asm, occs), inthms) => fn ctxt =>
- SIMPLE_METHOD' (SIDE_CONDS
- ((if asm then eqsubst_asm_tac else eqsubst_tac) ctxt occs inthms)
- ctxt)))
- "single-step substitution with auto-typechecking"))
-
-end;