| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
... | |
|
|
|
|
| |
(before it would fail to find e.g. the start layer if it wasn't a
top-level layer)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The script inject doesn't do anything for now; guess I'll re-add that
once we actually have a URI for that.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(these were `error` before, which didn't really make sense, since
workadventure can deal with them, they're just not allowed at rc3)
|
|
|
|
| |
also, float properties exist, apparently
|
|
|
|
| |
(in which case it just doesn't do anything at all)
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
(the format used last year is no longer applicable to this year's event)
|
|
|
|
| |
(found by running through rc3 2021 map submissions and looking at what failed)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(as per today's discussion with tabascoeye, mapCopyright should not be
required, though I've left it as recommended)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(previously it would just lint "can't use name twice" multiple times,
which looks kind of silly)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(forgot that `error` is the builtin haskell function; the one to create
linter errors is called `complain`)
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
it was kinda getting messy in places.
Also found some accidental isomorphisms between types, so these are now
only one type because the consequences were getting silly.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this includes a halfway-reasonable parsing of object layers, as well as
some monad plumbing to get them all in the right place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
because we can't ever trust workadventure, apparently.
why are we using that thing again?
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(to prevent name clashes between assemblies; shared jitsi rooms are
still possible simply by letting their names start with "shared-")
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(since otherwise we might run into namespace clashes for assemblies with
funny names)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
since the scripting API can define new properties and we (for now) do
not know what the script may or may not be able to do, the linter would
otherwise reject potentially valid maps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
("rudimentary" since for now the best it can do is just replacing /
prepending urls; presumably, it should also do a sanity check or
something of the like)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Among them
- always set correct exit codes
- refuse to write out files if the out path already exists
- calculate the overall severity correctly
- slightly changed the json output schema
- also output the text output format in json
- make the default config.json suitable for a production environment
|
|
|
|
| |
some parts of haskell are really, really old …
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this allows for creating custom URI "schemas" in the linter's config,
which may be either allowed, prefixed, or translated according to
some (domain-based) substitution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(these use a rather crude regex for parsing, which may be possible to
side-step, and which should probably be replaced by something that was
actually written while following the relevant rfc)
|
|
|
|
| |
we don't want to accidentally copy maps, whoopsie
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I have no idea why these even exist, but apparently they do, so here's
some code to deal with them in a hopefully useful manner …
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(mostly to do with the scripting API, but also some old ones which are
already deprecated / not even mentioned in the documentation anymore)
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I found yet more properties that weren't really documented or weren't
marked as optional, hurray!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the unhelpfulness of the spec is slowly starting to grate …
Anyways, apparently a lot more properties don't have to be present, and
you find out by finding maps somewhere that work but currently fail the
parser.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
(this would otherwise break the json schema if `--json` is given)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
also yet another typeclass™, because why not?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This got kinda out of hand, but it can now (a) read a json config file
and (b) patch that with another json given on the command line to change
some of the options given in the file.
No, I probably didn't need to make the `patch` function sufficiently
general to work with arbitrary records, but it was kinda fun to do.
|