summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/compiler
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler')
-rw-r--r--compiler/ExtractToFStar.ml16
-rw-r--r--compiler/InterpreterExpansion.ml106
-rw-r--r--compiler/InterpreterExpansion.mli76
-rw-r--r--compiler/InterpreterStatements.ml34
-rw-r--r--compiler/PrintPure.ml1
-rw-r--r--compiler/Pure.ml7
-rw-r--r--compiler/PureToExtract.ml16
-rw-r--r--compiler/PureUtils.ml4
-rw-r--r--compiler/SymbolicAst.ml1
-rw-r--r--compiler/SymbolicToPure.ml13
-rw-r--r--compiler/SynthesizeSymbolic.ml3
-rw-r--r--compiler/Translate.ml11
12 files changed, 184 insertions, 104 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/ExtractToFStar.ml b/compiler/ExtractToFStar.ml
index 7267101c..6d680984 100644
--- a/compiler/ExtractToFStar.ml
+++ b/compiler/ExtractToFStar.ml
@@ -105,7 +105,9 @@ let fstar_keywords =
"with";
"assert";
"assert_norm";
+ "assume";
"Type0";
+ "Type";
"unit";
"not";
"scalar_cast";
@@ -144,7 +146,7 @@ let fstar_assumed_functions :
(VecIndexMut, rg0, "vec_index_mut_back");
]
-let fstar_names_map_init =
+let fstar_names_map_init : names_map_init =
{
keywords = fstar_keywords;
assumed_adts = fstar_assumed_adts;
@@ -414,6 +416,7 @@ let mk_formatter (ctx : trans_ctx) (crate_name : string)
char_name = "char";
int_name;
str_name = "string";
+ assert_name = "massert";
field_name;
variant_name;
struct_constructor;
@@ -968,12 +971,17 @@ and extract_function_call (ctx : extraction_ctx) (fmt : F.formatter)
ctx.fmt.extract_binop
(extract_texpression ctx fmt)
fmt inside binop int_ty arg0 arg1
- | Regular (fun_id, rg_id), _ ->
+ | Regular (_, _), _ | Assert, [ _ ] ->
if inside then F.pp_print_string fmt "(";
(* Open a box for the function call *)
F.pp_open_hovbox fmt ctx.indent_incr;
(* Print the function name *)
- let fun_name = ctx_get_function fun_id rg_id ctx in
+ let fun_name =
+ match fid with
+ | Regular (fun_id, rg_id) -> ctx_get_function fun_id rg_id ctx
+ | Assert -> ctx.fmt.assert_name
+ | _ -> raise (Failure "Unreachable")
+ in
F.pp_print_string fmt fun_name;
(* Print the type parameters *)
List.iter
@@ -991,7 +999,7 @@ and extract_function_call (ctx : extraction_ctx) (fmt : F.formatter)
F.pp_close_box fmt ();
(* Return *)
if inside then F.pp_print_string fmt ")"
- | _ ->
+ | (Unop _ | Binop _ | Assert), _ ->
raise
(Failure
("Unreachable:\n" ^ "Function: " ^ show_fun_id fid
diff --git a/compiler/InterpreterExpansion.ml b/compiler/InterpreterExpansion.ml
index a0fe5ecb..fe9ccbf4 100644
--- a/compiler/InterpreterExpansion.ml
+++ b/compiler/InterpreterExpansion.ml
@@ -192,12 +192,6 @@ let replace_symbolic_values (at_most_once : bool)
(* Return *)
ctx
-(** Apply a symbolic expansion to a context, by replacing the original
- symbolic value with its expanded value. Is valid only if the expansion
- is not a borrow (i.e., an adt...).
-
- This function does update the synthesis.
-*)
let apply_symbolic_expansion_non_borrow (config : C.config)
(original_sv : V.symbolic_value) (expansion : V.symbolic_expansion)
(ctx : C.eval_ctx) : C.eval_ctx =
@@ -459,25 +453,43 @@ let expand_symbolic_value_borrow (config : C.config)
branches. Note that the expansion is optional for every branch (this is
used for integer expansion: see {!expand_symbolic_int}).
- [see_cf_l]: list of pairs (optional symbolic expansion, continuation)
+ [see_cf_l]: list of pairs (optional symbolic expansion, continuation).
+ We use [None] for the symbolic expansion for the [_] (default) case of the
+ integer expansions.
+ The continuation are used to execute the content of the branches, but not
+ what comes after.
+
+ [cf_after_join]: this continuation is called *after* the branches have been evaluated.
+ We need this continuation separately (i.e., we can't compose it with the
+ continuations in [see_cf_l]) because we perform a join *before* calling it.
*)
let apply_branching_symbolic_expansions_non_borrow (config : C.config)
(sv : V.symbolic_value) (sv_place : SA.mplace option)
- (see_cf_l : (V.symbolic_expansion option * m_fun) list) : m_fun =
+ (see_cf_l : (V.symbolic_expansion option * st_cm_fun) list)
+ (cf_after_join : st_m_fun) : m_fun =
fun ctx ->
assert (see_cf_l <> []);
- (* Apply the symbolic expansion in in the context and call the continuation *)
+ (* Apply the symbolic expansion in the context and call the continuation *)
let resl =
List.map
- (fun (see_opt, cf) ->
+ (fun (see_opt, cf_br) ->
+ (* Remember the initial context for printing purposes *)
+ let ctx0 = ctx in
(* Expansion *)
let ctx =
match see_opt with
| None -> ctx
| Some see -> apply_symbolic_expansion_non_borrow config sv see ctx
in
+ (* Debug *)
+ log#ldebug
+ (lazy
+ ("apply_branching_symbolic_expansions_non_borrow: "
+ ^ symbolic_value_to_string ctx0 sv
+ ^ "\n\n- original context:\n" ^ eval_ctx_to_string ctx0
+ ^ "\n\n- new context:\n" ^ eval_ctx_to_string ctx ^ "\n"));
(* Continuation *)
- cf ctx)
+ cf_br cf_after_join ctx)
see_cf_l
in
(* Collect the result: either we computed no subterm, or we computed all
@@ -495,7 +507,8 @@ let apply_branching_symbolic_expansions_non_borrow (config : C.config)
S.synthesize_symbolic_expansion sv sv_place seel subterms
let expand_symbolic_bool (config : C.config) (sv : V.symbolic_value)
- (sv_place : SA.mplace option) (cf_true : m_fun) (cf_false : m_fun) : m_fun =
+ (sv_place : SA.mplace option) (cf_true : st_cm_fun) (cf_false : st_cm_fun)
+ (cf_after_join : st_m_fun) : m_fun =
fun ctx ->
(* Compute the expanded value *)
let original_sv = sv in
@@ -508,7 +521,7 @@ let expand_symbolic_bool (config : C.config) (sv : V.symbolic_value)
let seel = [ (Some see_true, cf_true); (Some see_false, cf_false) ] in
(* Apply the symbolic expansion (this also outputs the updated symbolic AST) *)
apply_branching_symbolic_expansions_non_borrow config original_sv
- original_sv_place seel ctx
+ original_sv_place seel cf_after_join ctx
let expand_symbolic_value_no_branching (config : C.config)
(sv : V.symbolic_value) (sv_place : SA.mplace option) : cm_fun =
@@ -572,54 +585,38 @@ let expand_symbolic_value_no_branching (config : C.config)
cc cf ctx
let expand_symbolic_adt (config : C.config) (sv : V.symbolic_value)
- (sv_place : SA.mplace option) : cm_fun =
- fun cf ctx ->
+ (sv_place : SA.mplace option) (cf_branches : st_cm_fun)
+ (cf_after_join : st_m_fun) : m_fun =
+ fun ctx ->
(* Debug *)
log#ldebug (lazy ("expand_symbolic_adt:" ^ symbolic_value_to_string ctx sv));
- (* Remember the initial context for printing purposes *)
- let ctx0 = ctx in
(* Compute the expanded value - note that when doing so, we may introduce
* fresh symbolic values in the context (which thus gets updated) *)
let original_sv = sv in
let original_sv_place = sv_place in
let rty = original_sv.V.sv_ty in
- let cc : cm_fun =
- fun cf ctx ->
- match rty with
- (* ADTs *)
- | T.Adt (adt_id, regions, types) ->
- let allow_branching = true in
- (* Compute the expanded value *)
- let seel =
- compute_expanded_symbolic_adt_value allow_branching sv.sv_kind adt_id
- regions types ctx
- in
- (* Apply *)
- let seel = List.map (fun see -> (Some see, cf)) seel in
- apply_branching_symbolic_expansions_non_borrow config original_sv
- original_sv_place seel ctx
- | _ ->
- raise
- (Failure ("expand_symbolic_adt: unexpected type: " ^ T.show_rty rty))
- in
- (* Debug *)
- let cc =
- comp_unit cc (fun ctx ->
- log#ldebug
- (lazy
- ("expand_symbolic_adt: "
- ^ symbolic_value_to_string ctx0 sv
- ^ "\n\n- original context:\n" ^ eval_ctx_to_string ctx0
- ^ "\n\n- new context:\n" ^ eval_ctx_to_string ctx ^ "\n"));
- (* Sanity check: the symbolic value has disappeared *)
- assert (not (symbolic_value_id_in_ctx original_sv.V.sv_id ctx)))
- in
- (* Continue *)
- cc cf ctx
+ (* Execute *)
+ match rty with
+ (* ADTs *)
+ | T.Adt (adt_id, regions, types) ->
+ let allow_branching = true in
+ (* Compute the expanded value *)
+ let seel =
+ compute_expanded_symbolic_adt_value allow_branching sv.sv_kind adt_id
+ regions types ctx
+ in
+ (* Apply *)
+ let seel = List.map (fun see -> (Some see, cf_branches)) seel in
+ apply_branching_symbolic_expansions_non_borrow config original_sv
+ original_sv_place seel cf_after_join ctx
+ | _ ->
+ raise
+ (Failure ("expand_symbolic_adt: unexpected type: " ^ T.show_rty rty))
let expand_symbolic_int (config : C.config) (sv : V.symbolic_value)
(sv_place : SA.mplace option) (int_type : T.integer_type)
- (tgts : (V.scalar_value * m_fun) list) (otherwise : m_fun) : m_fun =
+ (tgts : (V.scalar_value * st_cm_fun) list) (otherwise : st_cm_fun)
+ (cf_after_join : st_m_fun) : m_fun =
(* Sanity check *)
assert (sv.V.sv_ty = T.Integer int_type);
(* For all the branches of the switch, we expand the symbolic value
@@ -631,12 +628,13 @@ let expand_symbolic_int (config : C.config) (sv : V.symbolic_value)
* First, generate the list of pairs:
* (optional expansion, statement to execute)
*)
- let tgts =
+ let seel =
List.map (fun (v, cf) -> (Some (V.SePrimitive (PV.Scalar v)), cf)) tgts
in
- let tgts = List.append tgts [ (None, otherwise) ] in
+ let seel = List.append seel [ (None, otherwise) ] in
(* Then expand and evaluate - this generates the proper symbolic AST *)
- apply_branching_symbolic_expansions_non_borrow config sv sv_place tgts
+ apply_branching_symbolic_expansions_non_borrow config sv sv_place seel
+ cf_after_join
(** Expand all the symbolic values which contain borrows.
Allows us to restrict ourselves to a simpler model for the projectors over
diff --git a/compiler/InterpreterExpansion.mli b/compiler/InterpreterExpansion.mli
index 54f9036f..a75f88fd 100644
--- a/compiler/InterpreterExpansion.mli
+++ b/compiler/InterpreterExpansion.mli
@@ -13,17 +13,60 @@ open InterpreterBorrows
type proj_kind = LoanProj | BorrowProj
-(** Expand a symbolic boolean *)
+(** Apply a symbolic expansion to a context, by replacing the original
+ symbolic value with its expanded value. Is valid only if the expansion
+ is *not a borrow* (i.e., an adt...).
+
+ This function does *not* update the synthesis.
+*)
+val apply_symbolic_expansion_non_borrow :
+ C.config ->
+ V.symbolic_value ->
+ V.symbolic_expansion ->
+ C.eval_ctx ->
+ C.eval_ctx
+
+(** Expand a symhbolic value, without branching *)
+val expand_symbolic_value_no_branching :
+ C.config -> V.symbolic_value -> SA.mplace option -> cm_fun
+
+(** Expand a symbolic enumeration (leads to branching if the enumeration has
+ more than one variant).
+
+ Parameters:
+ - [config]
+ - [sv]
+ - [sv_place]
+ - [cf_branches]: the continuation to evaluate the branches. This continuation
+ typically evaluates a [match] statement *after* we have performed the symbolic
+ expansion (in particular, we can have one continuation for all the branches).
+ - [cf_after_join]: the continuation for *after* the match (we perform a join
+ then call it).
+ *)
+val expand_symbolic_adt :
+ C.config ->
+ V.symbolic_value ->
+ SA.mplace option ->
+ st_cm_fun ->
+ st_m_fun ->
+ m_fun
+
+(** Expand a symbolic boolean.
+
+ Parameters: see {!expand_symbolic_adt}.
+ The two parameters of type [st_cm_fun] correspond to the [cf_branches]
+ parameter (here, there are exactly two branches).
+ *)
val expand_symbolic_bool :
- C.config -> V.symbolic_value -> SA.mplace option -> m_fun -> m_fun -> m_fun
+ C.config ->
+ V.symbolic_value ->
+ SA.mplace option ->
+ st_cm_fun ->
+ st_cm_fun ->
+ st_m_fun ->
+ m_fun
-(** Symbolic integers are expanded upon evaluating a [switch], when the integer
- is not an enumeration discriminant.
- Note that a discriminant is never symbolic: we evaluate discriminant values
- upon evaluating [eval_discriminant], which always generates a concrete value
- (because if we call it on a symbolic enumeration, we expand the enumeration
- *then* evaluate the discriminant). This is how we can spot "regular" switches
- over integers.
+(** Symbolic integers are expanded upon evaluating a [SwitchInt].
When expanding a boolean upon evaluating an [if ... then ... else ...],
or an enumeration just before matching over it, we can simply expand the
@@ -47,20 +90,11 @@ val expand_symbolic_int :
V.symbolic_value ->
SA.mplace option ->
T.integer_type ->
- (V.scalar_value * m_fun) list ->
- m_fun ->
+ (V.scalar_value * st_cm_fun) list ->
+ st_cm_fun ->
+ st_m_fun ->
m_fun
-(** See {!expand_symbolic_value} *)
-val expand_symbolic_value_no_branching :
- C.config -> V.symbolic_value -> SA.mplace option -> cm_fun
-
-(** Expand a symbolic enumeration (leads to branching if the enumeration has
- more than one variant).
- *)
-val expand_symbolic_adt :
- C.config -> V.symbolic_value -> SA.mplace option -> cm_fun
-
(** If this mode is activated through the [config], greedily expand the symbolic
values which need to be expanded. See {!C.config} for more information.
*)
diff --git a/compiler/InterpreterStatements.ml b/compiler/InterpreterStatements.ml
index 4dd03c1a..15962ee3 100644
--- a/compiler/InterpreterStatements.ml
+++ b/compiler/InterpreterStatements.ml
@@ -185,16 +185,18 @@ let eval_assertion (config : C.config) (assertion : A.assertion) : st_cm_fun =
| Symbolic sv ->
assert (config.mode = C.SymbolicMode);
assert (sv.V.sv_ty = T.Bool);
- (* Expand the symbolic value and call the proper continuation functions
- * for the true and false cases - TODO: call an "assert" function instead *)
- let cf_true : m_fun = fun ctx -> cf Unit ctx in
- let cf_false : m_fun = fun ctx -> cf Panic ctx in
- let expand =
- expand_symbolic_bool config sv
- (S.mk_opt_place_from_op assertion.cond ctx)
- cf_true cf_false
+ (* We continue the execution as if the test had succeeded, and thus
+ * perform the symbolic expansion: sv ~~> true.
+ * We will of course synthesize an assertion in the generated code
+ * (see below). *)
+ let ctx =
+ apply_symbolic_expansion_non_borrow config sv
+ (V.SePrimitive (PV.Bool true)) ctx
in
- expand ctx
+ (* Continue *)
+ let expr = cf Unit ctx in
+ (* Add the synthesized assertion *)
+ S.synthesize_assertion v expr
| _ ->
raise
(Failure ("Expected a boolean, got: " ^ typed_value_to_string ctx v))
@@ -949,11 +951,11 @@ and eval_switch (config : C.config) (switch : A.switch) : st_cm_fun =
| V.Symbolic sv ->
(* Expand the symbolic boolean, and continue by evaluating
* the branches *)
- let cf_true : m_fun = eval_statement config st1 cf in
- let cf_false : m_fun = eval_statement config st2 cf in
+ let cf_true : st_cm_fun = eval_statement config st1 in
+ let cf_false : st_cm_fun = eval_statement config st2 in
expand_symbolic_bool config sv
(S.mk_opt_place_from_op op ctx)
- cf_true cf_false ctx
+ cf_true cf_false cf ctx
| _ -> raise (Failure "Inconsistent state")
in
(* Compose *)
@@ -982,7 +984,7 @@ and eval_switch (config : C.config) (switch : A.switch) : st_cm_fun =
* proper branches *)
let stgts =
List.map
- (fun (cv, tgt_st) -> (cv, eval_statement config tgt_st cf))
+ (fun (cv, tgt_st) -> (cv, eval_statement config tgt_st))
stgts
in
(* Several branches may be grouped together: every branch is described
@@ -996,11 +998,11 @@ and eval_switch (config : C.config) (switch : A.switch) : st_cm_fun =
stgts)
in
(* Translate the otherwise branch *)
- let otherwise = eval_statement config otherwise cf in
+ let otherwise = eval_statement config otherwise in
(* Expand and continue *)
expand_symbolic_int config sv
(S.mk_opt_place_from_op op ctx)
- int_ty stgts otherwise ctx
+ int_ty stgts otherwise cf ctx
| _ -> raise (Failure "Inconsistent state")
in
(* Compose *)
@@ -1034,7 +1036,7 @@ and eval_switch (config : C.config) (switch : A.switch) : st_cm_fun =
in
(* Re-evaluate the switch - the value is not symbolic anymore,
which means we will go to the other branch *)
- comp cf_expand (eval_switch config switch) cf ctx
+ cf_expand (eval_switch config switch) cf ctx
| _ -> raise (Failure "Inconsistent state")
in
(* Compose *)
diff --git a/compiler/PrintPure.ml b/compiler/PrintPure.ml
index 64b527a2..0d1288d7 100644
--- a/compiler/PrintPure.ml
+++ b/compiler/PrintPure.ml
@@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ let fun_id_to_string (fmt : ast_formatter) (fun_id : fun_id) : string =
| Unop unop -> unop_to_string unop
| Binop (binop, int_ty) ->
binop_to_string binop ^ "<" ^ integer_type_to_string int_ty ^ ">"
+ | Assert -> "assert"
(** [inside]: controls the introduction of parentheses *)
let rec texpression_to_string (fmt : ast_formatter) (inside : bool)
diff --git a/compiler/Pure.ml b/compiler/Pure.ml
index 62657fc7..f11397e9 100644
--- a/compiler/Pure.ml
+++ b/compiler/Pure.ml
@@ -292,9 +292,11 @@ type fun_id =
works only if we unfold all the monadic let-bindings, and we
then replace the content of the occurrences of [Return] to also
return the state (which is really super ugly).
+ TODO: also add Assert...
*)
| Unop of unop
| Binop of E.binop * integer_type
+ | Assert
[@@deriving show, ord]
(** An identifier for an ADT constructor *)
@@ -394,8 +396,9 @@ type expression =
TODO: the boolean should be replaced by an enum: sometimes we use
the error-monad, sometimes we use the state-error monad (and we
- do this an a per-function basis! For instance, arithmetic functions
- are always in the error monad).
+ should do this an a per-function basis! For instance, arithmetic
+ functions are always in the error monad, they shouldn't use the
+ state-error monad).
The boolean controls whether the let is monadic or not.
For instance, in F*:
diff --git a/compiler/PureToExtract.ml b/compiler/PureToExtract.ml
index e38a92db..860949a7 100644
--- a/compiler/PureToExtract.ml
+++ b/compiler/PureToExtract.ml
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ type formatter = {
char_name : string;
int_name : integer_type -> string;
str_name : string;
+ assert_name : string;
field_name : name -> FieldId.id -> string option -> string;
(** Inputs:
- type name
@@ -632,11 +633,20 @@ type names_map_init = {
(** Initialize a names map with a proper set of keywords/names coming from the
target language/prover. *)
-let initialize_names_map (init : names_map_init) : names_map =
+let initialize_names_map (fmt : formatter) (init : names_map_init) : names_map =
+ let int_names = List.map fmt.int_name T.all_int_types in
+ let keywords =
+ List.concat
+ [
+ [ fmt.bool_name; fmt.char_name; fmt.str_name; fmt.assert_name ];
+ int_names;
+ init.keywords;
+ ]
+ in
+ let names_set = StringSet.of_list keywords in
let name_to_id =
- StringMap.of_list (List.map (fun x -> (x, UnknownId)) init.keywords)
+ StringMap.of_list (List.map (fun x -> (x, UnknownId)) keywords)
in
- let names_set = StringSet.of_list init.keywords in
(* We fist initialize [id_to_name] as empty, because the id of a keyword is [UnknownId].
* Also note that we don't need this mapping for keywords: we insert keywords only
* to check collisions. *)
diff --git a/compiler/PureUtils.ml b/compiler/PureUtils.ml
index 9d364dc7..e292576c 100644
--- a/compiler/PureUtils.ml
+++ b/compiler/PureUtils.ml
@@ -350,6 +350,10 @@ let mk_typed_pattern_from_var (v : var) (mp : mplace option) : typed_pattern =
let ty = v.ty in
{ value; ty }
+let mk_dummy_pattern (ty : ty) : typed_pattern =
+ let value = PatDummy in
+ { value; ty }
+
let mk_meta (m : meta) (e : texpression) : texpression =
let ty = e.ty in
let e = Meta (m, e) in
diff --git a/compiler/SymbolicAst.ml b/compiler/SymbolicAst.ml
index 39709a13..528d8255 100644
--- a/compiler/SymbolicAst.ml
+++ b/compiler/SymbolicAst.ml
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ type expression =
| EndAbstraction of V.abs * expression
| EvalGlobal of A.GlobalDeclId.id * V.symbolic_value * expression
(** Evaluate a global to a fresh symbolic value *)
+ | Assertion of V.typed_value * expression (** An assertion *)
| Expansion of mplace option * V.symbolic_value * expansion
(** Expansion of a symbolic value.
diff --git a/compiler/SymbolicToPure.ml b/compiler/SymbolicToPure.ml
index 3636d4b8..8329d80e 100644
--- a/compiler/SymbolicToPure.ml
+++ b/compiler/SymbolicToPure.ml
@@ -1084,6 +1084,7 @@ let rec translate_expression (config : config) (e : S.expression) (ctx : bs_ctx)
| FunCall (call, e) -> translate_function_call config call e ctx
| EndAbstraction (abs, e) -> translate_end_abstraction config abs e ctx
| EvalGlobal (gid, sv, e) -> translate_global_eval config gid sv e ctx
+ | Assertion (v, e) -> translate_assertion config v e ctx
| Expansion (p, sv, exp) -> translate_expansion config p sv exp ctx
| Meta (meta, e) -> translate_meta config meta e ctx
@@ -1480,6 +1481,18 @@ and translate_global_eval (config : config) (gid : A.GlobalDeclId.id)
let e = translate_expression config e ctx in
mk_let false (mk_typed_pattern_from_var var None) gval e
+and translate_assertion (config : config) (v : V.typed_value) (e : S.expression)
+ (ctx : bs_ctx) : texpression =
+ let next_e = translate_expression config e ctx in
+ let monadic = true in
+ let v = typed_value_to_texpression ctx v in
+ let args = [ v ] in
+ let func = { id = Func Assert; type_args = [] } in
+ let func_ty = mk_arrow Bool mk_unit_ty in
+ let func = { e = Qualif func; ty = func_ty } in
+ let assertion = mk_apps func args in
+ mk_let monadic (mk_dummy_pattern mk_unit_ty) assertion next_e
+
and translate_expansion (config : config) (p : S.mplace option)
(sv : V.symbolic_value) (exp : S.expansion) (ctx : bs_ctx) : texpression =
(* Translate the scrutinee *)
diff --git a/compiler/SynthesizeSymbolic.ml b/compiler/SynthesizeSymbolic.ml
index 504fcdb5..c74a831e 100644
--- a/compiler/SynthesizeSymbolic.ml
+++ b/compiler/SynthesizeSymbolic.ml
@@ -155,3 +155,6 @@ let synthesize_assignment (lplace : mplace) (rvalue : V.typed_value)
match expr with
| None -> None
| Some expr -> Some (Meta (Assignment (lplace, rvalue, rplace), expr))
+
+let synthesize_assertion (v : V.typed_value) (expr : expression option) =
+ match expr with None -> None | Some expr -> Some (Assertion (v, expr))
diff --git a/compiler/Translate.ml b/compiler/Translate.ml
index 46f8172a..d7cc9155 100644
--- a/compiler/Translate.ml
+++ b/compiler/Translate.ml
@@ -634,15 +634,18 @@ let translate_module (filename : string) (dest_dir : string) (config : config)
config.use_state crate
in
- (* Initialize the extraction context - for now we extract only to F* *)
- let names_map =
- PureToExtract.initialize_names_map ExtractToFStar.fstar_names_map_init
- in
+ (* Initialize the extraction context - for now we extract only to F*.
+ * We initialize the names map by registering the keywords used in the
+ * language, as well as some primitive names ("u32", etc.) *)
let variant_concatenate_type_name = true in
let fstar_fmt =
ExtractToFStar.mk_formatter trans_ctx crate.name
variant_concatenate_type_name
in
+ let names_map =
+ PureToExtract.initialize_names_map fstar_fmt
+ ExtractToFStar.fstar_names_map_init
+ in
let ctx =
{ PureToExtract.trans_ctx; names_map; fmt = fstar_fmt; indent_incr = 2 }
in