diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'backends/lean/Base/Arith/Int.lean')
| -rw-r--r-- | backends/lean/Base/Arith/Int.lean | 10 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/backends/lean/Base/Arith/Int.lean b/backends/lean/Base/Arith/Int.lean index 531ec94f..3359ecdb 100644 --- a/backends/lean/Base/Arith/Int.lean +++ b/backends/lean/Base/Arith/Int.lean @@ -211,9 +211,11 @@ def intTacPreprocess (extraPreprocess : Tactic.TacticM Unit) : Tactic.TacticM U let _ ← introHasIntPropInstances -- Extra preprocessing, before we split on the disjunctions extraPreprocess - -- Split - let asms ← introInstances ``PropHasImp.concl lookupPropHasImp - splitOnAsms asms.toList + -- Split - note that the extra-preprocessing step might actually have + -- proven the goal (by doing simplifications for instance) + Tactic.allGoals do + let asms ← introInstances ``PropHasImp.concl lookupPropHasImp + splitOnAsms asms.toList elab "int_tac_preprocess" : tactic => intTacPreprocess (do pure ()) @@ -238,7 +240,7 @@ def intTac (splitGoalConjs : Bool) (extraPreprocess : Tactic.TacticM Unit) : Ta -- the goal. I think before leads to a smaller proof term? Tactic.allGoals (intTacPreprocess extraPreprocess) -- More preprocessing - Tactic.allGoals (Utils.simpAt [] [``nat_zero_eq_int_zero] [] .wildcard) + Tactic.allGoals (Utils.tryTac (Utils.simpAt [] [``nat_zero_eq_int_zero] [] .wildcard)) -- Split the conjunctions in the goal if splitGoalConjs then Tactic.allGoals (Utils.repeatTac Utils.splitConjTarget) -- Call linarith |