summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--tests/hashmap/Hashmap.Properties.fst135
1 files changed, 115 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/tests/hashmap/Hashmap.Properties.fst b/tests/hashmap/Hashmap.Properties.fst
index 9833d420..532dae69 100644
--- a/tests/hashmap/Hashmap.Properties.fst
+++ b/tests/hashmap/Hashmap.Properties.fst
@@ -156,6 +156,18 @@ module InteractiveHelpers = FStar.InteractiveHelpers
///
/// Finally: remember (again) that we are in a pure setting. Imagine having to
/// deal with Low*/separation logic at the same time.
+///
+/// - debugging a proof can be difficult, especially when Z3 simply answers with
+/// "Unknown assertion failed". Rolling admits work reasonably well, though time
+/// consuming, but they cause trouble when the failing proof obligation is in the
+/// postcondition of the function: in this situation we need to copy-paste the
+/// postcondition in order to be able to do the rolling admit. As we may need to
+/// rename some variables, this implies copying the post, instantiating it (by hand),
+/// checking that it is correct (by assuming it and making sure the proofs pass),
+/// then doing the rolling admit, assertion by assertion. This is tedious and,
+/// combined with F*'s answer time, very time consuming (and boring!).
+///
+/// See [hash_map_insert_fwd_back_lem] for instance.
(*** List lemmas *)
@@ -1515,14 +1527,20 @@ let hash_map_insert_no_resize_fwd_back_lem_s t self key value =
(**** insert_{no_fail,no_resize}: invariants *)
-let insert_post (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_slots_s_nes t)
+let hash_map_t_updated_binding
+ (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_slots_s_nes t)
(key : usize) (value : t) (hm' : hash_map_slots_s_nes t) : Type0 =
- // The invariant is preserved
- hash_map_slots_s_inv hm' /\
// [key] maps to [value]
hash_map_slots_s_find hm' key == Some value /\
// The other bindings are preserved
- (forall k'. k' <> key ==> hash_map_slots_s_find hm' k' == hash_map_slots_s_find hm k') /\
+ (forall k'. k' <> key ==> hash_map_slots_s_find hm' k' == hash_map_slots_s_find hm k')
+
+let insert_post (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_slots_s_nes t)
+ (key : usize) (value : t) (hm' : hash_map_slots_s_nes t) : Type0 =
+ // The invariant is preserved
+ hash_map_slots_s_inv hm' /\
+ // [key] maps to [value] and the other bindings are preserved
+ hash_map_t_updated_binding hm key value hm' /\
// The length is incremented, iff we inserted a new key
(match hash_map_slots_s_find hm key with
| None -> hash_map_slots_s_len hm' = hash_map_slots_s_len hm + 1
@@ -1868,7 +1886,7 @@ let rec hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back_lem_refin t ntable slots i =
(**** move_elements: refinement 2 *)
/// We prove a second refinement lemma: calling [move_elements] refines a function
-/// which which moves every binding of the hash map seen as *one* associative list
+/// which moves every binding of the hash map seen as *one* associative list
/// (and not a list of lists).
/// [ntable] is the hash map to which we move the elements
@@ -2329,7 +2347,9 @@ val hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back_lem
length ntable'.hash_map_slots = length ntable.hash_map_slots /\
// The count is good
hash_map_t_len_s ntable' = length al /\
- // The table can be linked to its model (not really necessary anymore)
+ // The table can be linked to its model (we need this only to reveal
+ // "pretty" functional lemmas to the user in the fsti - so that we
+ // can write lemmas with SMT patterns - this is very F* specific)
hash_map_t_slots_v ntable' == ntable'_v /\
// The new table contains exactly all the bindings from the slots
// Rk.: see the comment for [hash_map_is_assoc_list]
@@ -2385,10 +2405,10 @@ let hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back_lem t ntable slots =
(*** try_resize *)
-/// Refinement.
+/// Refinement 1.
/// This one is slightly "crude": we just simplify a bit the function.
-let hash_map_try_resize_s
+let hash_map_try_resize_s_simpl
(#t : Type0)
(hm : hash_map_t t) :
Pure (result (hash_map_t t))
@@ -2435,7 +2455,7 @@ val hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem_refin
divid > 0 /\ divis > 0))
(ensures (
match hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back t self,
- hash_map_try_resize_s self
+ hash_map_try_resize_s_simpl self
with
| Fail, Fail -> True
| Return hm1, Return hm2 -> hm1 == hm2
@@ -2526,7 +2546,7 @@ val hash_map_is_assoc_list_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) :
let hash_map_is_assoc_list_lem #t hm = admit()
-val hash_map_try_resize_s_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) :
+val hash_map_try_resize_s_simpl_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) :
Lemma
(requires (
// The base invariant is satisfied
@@ -2542,7 +2562,7 @@ val hash_map_try_resize_s_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) :
length hm.hash_map_slots * 2 * dividend > usize_max)
))
(ensures (
- match hash_map_try_resize_s hm with
+ match hash_map_try_resize_s_simpl hm with
| Fail -> False
| Return hm' ->
// The full invariant is now satisfied (the full invariant is "base
@@ -2554,7 +2574,7 @@ val hash_map_try_resize_s_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) :
#restart-solver
#push-options "--z3rlimit 400"
-let hash_map_try_resize_s_lem #t hm =
+let hash_map_try_resize_s_simpl_lem #t hm =
let capacity = length hm.hash_map_slots in
let (divid, divis) = hm.hash_map_max_load_factor in
if capacity <= (usize_max / 2) / divid then
@@ -2607,6 +2627,9 @@ let hash_map_try_resize_s_lem #t hm =
end
#pop-options
+let hash_map_t_same_bindings (#t : Type0) (hm hm' : hash_map_t_nes t) : Type0 =
+ forall (k:key). hash_map_t_find_s hm k == hash_map_t_find_s hm' k
+
/// The final lemma about [try_resize]
val hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) :
Lemma
@@ -2629,12 +2652,14 @@ val hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) :
// invariant" + the map is not overloaded (or can't be resized because
// already too big)
hash_map_t_inv hm' /\
+ // The length is the same
+ hash_map_t_len_s hm' = hash_map_t_len_s hm /\
// It contains the same bindings as the initial map
- (forall (k:key). hash_map_t_find_s hm' k == hash_map_t_find_s hm k)))
+ hash_map_t_same_bindings hm' hm))
let hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem #t hm =
hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem_refin t hm;
- hash_map_try_resize_s_lem hm
+ hash_map_try_resize_s_simpl_lem hm
(*** insert *)
@@ -2677,26 +2702,70 @@ val hash_map_insert_fwd_back_lem
| Return hm' ->
// The invariant is preserved
hash_map_t_inv hm' /\
- // [key] maps to [value]
- hash_map_t_find_s hm' key == Some value /\
- // The other bindings are preserved
- (forall k'. k' <> key ==> hash_map_t_find_s hm' k' == hash_map_t_find_s hm' k') /\
+ // [key] maps to [value] and the other bindings are preserved
+ hash_map_t_updated_binding (hash_map_t_slots_v self) key value (hash_map_t_slots_v hm') /\
+// hash_map_t_find_s hm' key == Some value /\
+ // The other bindings are preserved- TODO
+// (forall k'. k' <> key ==> hash_map_t_find_s hm' k' == hash_map_t_find_s self k') /\
// The length is incremented, iff we inserted a new key
(match hash_map_t_find_s self key with
| None -> hash_map_t_len_s hm' = hash_map_t_len_s self + 1
| Some _ -> hash_map_t_len_s hm' = hash_map_t_len_s self)))
+let hash_map_insert_fwd_back_bindings_lem
+ (t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t_nes t) (key : usize) (value : t)
+ (hm' hm'' : hash_map_t_nes t) :
+ Lemma
+ (requires (
+ hash_map_t_updated_binding (hash_map_t_slots_v self) key value (hash_map_t_slots_v hm') /\
+ hash_map_t_same_bindings hm' hm''))
+ (ensures (
+ hash_map_t_updated_binding (hash_map_t_slots_v self) key value (hash_map_t_slots_v hm'')))
+ = ()
+
+#restart-solver
+#push-options "--z3rlimit 500"
let hash_map_insert_fwd_back_lem t self key value =
hash_map_insert_no_resize_fwd_back_lem_s t self key value;
hash_map_insert_no_resize_s_lem (hash_map_t_slots_v self) key value;
match hash_map_insert_no_resize_fwd_back t self key value with
| Fail -> ()
| Return hm' ->
+ // Expanding the post of [hash_map_insert_no_resize_fwd_back_lem_s]
+ let self_v = hash_map_t_slots_v self in
+ let hm'_v = Return?.v (hash_map_insert_no_resize_s self_v key value) in
+ assert(hash_map_t_base_inv hm');
+ assert(hash_map_same_params hm' self);
+ assert(hash_map_t_slots_v hm' == hm'_v);
+ assert(hash_map_slots_s_len hm'_v == hash_map_t_len_s hm');
+ // Expanding the post of [hash_map_insert_no_resize_s_lem]
+ assert(insert_post self_v key value hm'_v);
+ // Expanding [insert_post]
+ assert(hash_map_slots_s_inv hm'_v);
+ assert(
+ match hash_map_slots_s_find self_v key with
+ | None -> hash_map_slots_s_len hm'_v = hash_map_slots_s_len self_v + 1
+ | Some _ -> hash_map_slots_s_len hm'_v = hash_map_slots_s_len self_v);
if hash_map_t_len_s hm' > hm'.hash_map_max_load then
begin
- hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem hm'
+ hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem hm';
+ // Expanding the post of [hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem]
+ let hm'' = Return?.v (hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back t hm') in
+ assert(hash_map_t_inv hm'');
+ let hm''_v = hash_map_t_slots_v hm'' in
+ assert(forall k. hash_map_t_find_s hm'' k == hash_map_t_find_s hm' k);
+ assert(hash_map_t_len_s hm'' = hash_map_t_len_s hm'); // TODO
+ // Proving the post
+ assert(hash_map_t_inv hm'');
+ hash_map_insert_fwd_back_bindings_lem t self key value hm' hm'';
+ assert(
+ match hash_map_t_find_s self key with
+ | None -> hash_map_t_len_s hm'' = hash_map_t_len_s self + 1
+ | Some _ -> hash_map_t_len_s hm'' = hash_map_t_len_s self)
end
else ()
+#pop-options
+
(*** contains_key *)
@@ -2999,4 +3068,30 @@ let hash_map_get_mut_back_lem #t hm key ret =
hash_map_insert_no_fail_s_lem hm_v key ret
-(*** remove *)
+(*** remove'fwd *)
+
+
+(*
+(** [hashmap::HashMap::remove_from_list] *)
+let rec hash_map_remove_from_list_fwd
+ (t : Type0) (key : usize) (ls : list_t t) :
+ Tot (result (option t))
+ (decreases (hash_map_remove_from_list_decreases t key ls))
+ =
+ begin match ls with
+ | ListCons ckey x tl ->
+ let b = ckey = key in
+ if b
+ then
+ let mv_ls = mem_replace_fwd (list_t t) (ListCons ckey x tl) ListNil in
+ begin match mv_ls with
+ | ListCons i cvalue tl0 -> Return (Some cvalue)
+ | ListNil -> Fail
+ end
+ else
+ begin match hash_map_remove_from_list_fwd t key tl with
+ | Fail -> Fail
+ | Return opt -> Return opt
+ end
+ | ListNil -> Return None
+ end