18 files changed, 780 insertions, 107 deletions
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 31dc74f4..c0a09ebe 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -17,6 +17,8 @@ internal language to a pure lamdba calculus.  It is intended to be used in combi
 representation called LLBC. It currently has backends for [F\*](https://www.fstar-lang.org),
 [Coq](https://coq.inria.fr/), [HOL4](https://hol-theorem-prover.org/) and [LEAN](https://leanprover.github.io/).
 
+If you want to contribute or ask questions, we strongly encourage you to join the [Zulip](https://aeneas-verif.zulipchat.com/).
+
 ## Project Structure
 
 - `src`: the OCaml sources. Note that we rely on [Dune](https://github.com/ocaml/dune)
@@ -105,6 +107,8 @@ support for partial functions and extrinsic proofs of termination (see
 and tactics specialized for monadic programs (see
 `./backends/lean/Base/Progress/Progress.lean` and `./backends/hol4/primitivesLib.sml`).
 
+A tutorial for the Lean backend is available [here](./tests/lean/Tutorial.lean).
+
 ## Formalization
 
 The translation has been formalized and published at ICFP2022: [Aeneas: Rust
diff --git a/backends/lean/Base/Arith/Int.lean b/backends/lean/Base/Arith/Int.lean
index 531ec94f..3359ecdb 100644
--- a/backends/lean/Base/Arith/Int.lean
+++ b/backends/lean/Base/Arith/Int.lean
@@ -211,9 +211,11 @@ def intTacPreprocess (extraPreprocess :  Tactic.TacticM Unit) : Tactic.TacticM U
   let _ ← introHasIntPropInstances
   -- Extra preprocessing, before we split on the disjunctions
   extraPreprocess
-  -- Split
-  let asms ← introInstances ``PropHasImp.concl lookupPropHasImp
-  splitOnAsms asms.toList
+  -- Split - note that the extra-preprocessing step might actually have
+  -- proven the goal (by doing simplifications for instance)
+  Tactic.allGoals do
+    let asms ← introInstances ``PropHasImp.concl lookupPropHasImp
+    splitOnAsms asms.toList
 
 elab "int_tac_preprocess" : tactic =>
   intTacPreprocess (do pure ())
@@ -238,7 +240,7 @@ def intTac (splitGoalConjs : Bool) (extraPreprocess :  Tactic.TacticM Unit) : Ta
   -- the goal. I think before leads to a smaller proof term?
   Tactic.allGoals (intTacPreprocess extraPreprocess)
   -- More preprocessing
-  Tactic.allGoals (Utils.simpAt [] [``nat_zero_eq_int_zero] [] .wildcard)
+  Tactic.allGoals (Utils.tryTac (Utils.simpAt [] [``nat_zero_eq_int_zero] [] .wildcard))
   -- Split the conjunctions in the goal
   if splitGoalConjs then Tactic.allGoals (Utils.repeatTac Utils.splitConjTarget)
   -- Call linarith
diff --git a/backends/lean/Base/Arith/Scalar.lean b/backends/lean/Base/Arith/Scalar.lean
index db672489..47751c8a 100644
--- a/backends/lean/Base/Arith/Scalar.lean
+++ b/backends/lean/Base/Arith/Scalar.lean
@@ -16,14 +16,15 @@ def scalarTacExtraPreprocess : Tactic.TacticM Unit := do
    add (← mkAppM ``Scalar.cMin_bound #[.const ``ScalarTy.Isize []])
    add (← mkAppM ``Scalar.cMax_bound #[.const ``ScalarTy.Usize []])
    add (← mkAppM ``Scalar.cMax_bound #[.const ``ScalarTy.Isize []])
-   -- Reveal the concrete bounds
+   -- Reveal the concrete bounds, simplify calls to [ofInt]
    Utils.simpAt [``Scalar.min, ``Scalar.max, ``Scalar.cMin, ``Scalar.cMax,
                  ``I8.min, ``I16.min, ``I32.min, ``I64.min, ``I128.min,
                  ``I8.max, ``I16.max, ``I32.max, ``I64.max, ``I128.max,
                  ``U8.min, ``U16.min, ``U32.min, ``U64.min, ``U128.min,
                  ``U8.max, ``U16.max, ``U32.max, ``U64.max, ``U128.max,
                  ``Usize.min
-                 ] [] [] .wildcard
+                 ] [``Scalar.ofInt_val_eq, ``Scalar.neq_to_neq_val] [] .wildcard
+   
 
 elab "scalar_tac_preprocess" : tactic =>
   intTacPreprocess scalarTacExtraPreprocess
@@ -50,4 +51,16 @@ example (x y : U32) : x.val ≤ Scalar.max ScalarTy.U32 := by
 example (x : U32 × U32) : 0 ≤ x.fst.val := by
   scalar_tac
 
+-- Checking that we properly handle [ofInt]
+example : U32.ofInt 1 ≤ U32.max := by
+  scalar_tac
+
+example (x : Int) (h0 : 0 ≤ x) (h1 : x ≤ U32.max) :
+  U32.ofInt x (by constructor <;> scalar_tac) ≤ U32.max := by
+  scalar_tac
+
+-- Not equal
+example (x : U32) (h0 : ¬ x = U32.ofInt 0) : 0 < x.val := by
+  scalar_tac
+
 end Arith
diff --git a/backends/lean/Base/Diverge/Base.lean b/backends/lean/Base/Diverge/Base.lean
index 1d548389..6a52387d 100644
--- a/backends/lean/Base/Diverge/Base.lean
+++ b/backends/lean/Base/Diverge/Base.lean
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ namespace Fix
     simp [karrow_rel, result_rel]
     have hg := hg Hrgh; simp [result_rel] at hg
     cases heq0: g fg <;> simp_all
-    rename_i y _
+    rename_i _ y
     have hh := hh y Hrgh; simp [result_rel] at hh
     simp_all
 
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ namespace FixI
   termination_by for_all_fin_aux n _ m h => n - m
   decreasing_by
     simp_wf
-    apply Nat.sub_add_lt_sub <;> simp
+    apply Nat.sub_add_lt_sub <;> try simp
     simp_all [Arith.add_one_le_iff_le_ne]
 
   def for_all_fin {n : Nat} (f : Fin n → Prop) := for_all_fin_aux f 0 (by simp)
@@ -569,7 +569,6 @@ namespace FixI
       intro i h3; cases i; simp_all
       linarith
     case succ k hi =>
-      simp_all
       intro m hk hmn
       intro hf i hmi
       have hne: m ≠ n := by
@@ -580,7 +579,6 @@ namespace FixI
         -- Yes: simply use the `for_all_fin_aux` hyp
         unfold for_all_fin_aux at hf
         simp_all
-        tauto
       else
         -- No: use the induction hypothesis
         have hlt: m < i := by simp_all [Nat.lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@@ -726,8 +724,8 @@ namespace Ex1
   theorem list_nth_body_is_valid: ∀ k x, is_valid_p k (λ k => @list_nth_body a k x) := by
     intro k x
     simp [list_nth_body]
-    split <;> simp
-    split <;> simp
+    split <;> try simp
+    split <;> try simp
 
   def list_nth (ls : List a) (i : Int) : Result a := fix list_nth_body (ls, i)
 
@@ -767,8 +765,8 @@ namespace Ex2
   theorem list_nth_body_is_valid: ∀ k x, is_valid_p k (λ k => @list_nth_body a k x) := by
     intro k x
     simp [list_nth_body]
-    split <;> simp
-    split <;> simp
+    split <;> try simp
+    split <;> try simp
     apply is_valid_p_bind <;> intros <;> simp_all
 
   def list_nth (ls : List a) (i : Int) : Result a := fix list_nth_body (ls, i)
@@ -845,7 +843,7 @@ namespace Ex3
     ∀ k x, is_valid_p k (λ k => is_even_is_odd_body k x) := by
     intro k x
     simp [is_even_is_odd_body]
-    split <;> simp <;> split <;> simp
+    split <;> (try simp) <;> split <;> try simp
     apply is_valid_p_bind; simp
     intros; split <;> simp
     apply is_valid_p_bind; simp
@@ -878,7 +876,7 @@ namespace Ex3
     -- inductives on the fly).
     -- The simplest is to repeatedly split then simplify (we identify
     -- the outer match or monadic let-binding, and split on its scrutinee)
-    split <;> simp
+    split <;> try simp
     cases H0 : fix is_even_is_odd_body (Sum.inr (i - 1)) <;> simp
     rename_i v
     split <;> simp
@@ -891,7 +889,7 @@ namespace Ex3
     simp [is_even, is_odd]
     conv => lhs; rw [Heq]; simp; rw [is_even_is_odd_body]; simp
     -- Same remark as for `even`
-    split <;> simp
+    split <;> try simp
     cases H0 : fix is_even_is_odd_body (Sum.inl (i - 1)) <;> simp
     rename_i v
     split <;> simp
@@ -938,7 +936,7 @@ namespace Ex4
     intro k
     apply (Funs.is_valid_p_is_valid_p tys)
     simp [Funs.is_valid_p]
-    (repeat (apply And.intro)) <;> intro x <;> simp at x <;>
+    (repeat (apply And.intro)) <;> intro x <;> (try simp at x) <;>
     simp only [is_even_body, is_odd_body]
     -- Prove the validity of the individual bodies
     . split <;> simp
@@ -995,9 +993,9 @@ namespace Ex5
     (ls : List a) :
     is_valid_p k (λ k => map (f k) ls) := by
     induction ls <;> simp [map]
-    apply is_valid_p_bind <;> simp_all
+    apply is_valid_p_bind <;> try simp_all
     intros
-    apply is_valid_p_bind <;> simp_all
+    apply is_valid_p_bind <;> try simp_all
 
   /- An example which uses map -/
   inductive Tree (a : Type) :=
@@ -1016,8 +1014,8 @@ namespace Ex5
     ∀ k x, is_valid_p k (λ k => @id_body a k x) := by
     intro k x
     simp only [id_body]
-    split <;> simp
-    apply is_valid_p_bind <;> simp [*]
+    split <;> try simp
+    apply is_valid_p_bind <;> try simp [*]
     -- We have to show that `map k tl` is valid
     apply map_is_valid;
     -- Remark: if we don't do the intro, then the last step is expensive:
@@ -1077,12 +1075,11 @@ namespace Ex6
     intro k
     apply (Funs.is_valid_p_is_valid_p tys)
     simp [Funs.is_valid_p]
-    (repeat (apply And.intro)); intro x; simp at x
+    (repeat (apply And.intro)); intro x; try simp at x
     simp only [list_nth_body]
     -- Prove the validity of the individual bodies
     intro k x
-    simp [list_nth_body]
-    split <;> simp
+    split <;> try simp
     split <;> simp
 
   -- Writing the proof terms explicitly
diff --git a/backends/lean/Base/Diverge/Elab.lean b/backends/lean/Base/Diverge/Elab.lean
index f109e847..c6628486 100644
--- a/backends/lean/Base/Diverge/Elab.lean
+++ b/backends/lean/Base/Diverge/Elab.lean
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ namespace Tests
       intro i hpos h
       -- We can directly use `rw [list_nth]`!
       rw [list_nth]; simp
-      split <;> simp [*]
+      split <;> try simp [*]
       . tauto
       . -- TODO: we shouldn't have to do that
         have hneq : 0 < i := by cases i <;> rename_i a _ <;> simp_all; cases a <;> simp_all
diff --git a/backends/lean/Base/IList/IList.lean b/backends/lean/Base/IList/IList.lean
index f10ec4e7..79de93d5 100644
--- a/backends/lean/Base/IList/IList.lean
+++ b/backends/lean/Base/IList/IList.lean
@@ -294,7 +294,6 @@ open Arith in
     have := tl.len_pos
     linarith
   else
-    simp at hineq
     have : 0 < i := by int_tac
     simp [*]
     apply hi
@@ -419,8 +418,8 @@ theorem index_itake_append_end [Inhabited α] (i j : Int) (l0 l1 : List α)
   match l0 with
   | [] => by
     simp at *
-    have := index_itake i j l1 (by simp_all) (by simp_all) (by simp_all; int_tac)
-    simp [*]
+    have := index_itake i j l1 (by simp_all) (by simp_all) (by int_tac)
+    try simp [*]
   | hd :: tl =>
     have : ¬ i = 0 := by simp at *; int_tac
     if hj : j = 0 then by simp_all; int_tac -- Contradiction
diff --git a/backends/lean/Base/Primitives/Scalar.lean b/backends/lean/Base/Primitives/Scalar.lean
index 9e65d3c0..ec9665a5 100644
--- a/backends/lean/Base/Primitives/Scalar.lean
+++ b/backends/lean/Base/Primitives/Scalar.lean
@@ -533,6 +533,36 @@ theorem Scalar.add_unsigned_spec {ty} (s: ¬ ty.isSigned) {x y : Scalar ty}
   ∃ z, x + y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val + y.val := by
   apply Scalar.add_unsigned_spec <;> simp only [Scalar.max, *]
 
+@[cepspec] theorem Isize.add_spec {x y : Isize}
+  (hmin : Isize.min ≤ x.val + y.val) (hmax : x.val + y.val ≤ Isize.max) :
+  ∃ z, x + y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val + y.val :=
+  Scalar.add_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I8.add_spec {x y : I8}
+  (hmin : I8.min ≤ x.val + y.val) (hmax : x.val + y.val ≤ I8.max) :
+  ∃ z, x + y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val + y.val :=
+  Scalar.add_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I16.add_spec {x y : I16}
+  (hmin : I16.min ≤ x.val + y.val) (hmax : x.val + y.val ≤ I16.max) :
+  ∃ z, x + y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val + y.val :=
+  Scalar.add_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I32.add_spec {x y : I32}
+  (hmin : I32.min ≤ x.val + y.val) (hmax : x.val + y.val ≤ I32.max) :
+  ∃ z, x + y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val + y.val :=
+  Scalar.add_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I64.add_spec {x y : I64}
+  (hmin : I64.min ≤ x.val + y.val) (hmax : x.val + y.val ≤ I64.max) :
+  ∃ z, x + y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val + y.val :=
+  Scalar.add_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I128.add_spec {x y : I128}
+  (hmin : I128.min ≤ x.val + y.val) (hmax : x.val + y.val ≤ I128.max) :
+  ∃ z, x + y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val + y.val :=
+  Scalar.add_spec hmin hmax
+
 -- Generic theorem - shouldn't be used much
 @[cpspec]
 theorem Scalar.sub_spec {ty} {x y : Scalar ty}
@@ -582,6 +612,36 @@ theorem Scalar.sub_unsigned_spec {ty} (s: ¬ ty.isSigned) {x y : Scalar ty}
   ∃ z, x - y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val - y.val := by
   apply Scalar.sub_unsigned_spec <;> simp only [Scalar.min, *]
 
+@[cepspec] theorem Isize.sub_spec {x y : Isize} (hmin : Isize.min ≤ x.val - y.val)
+  (hmax : x.val - y.val ≤ Isize.max) :
+  ∃ z, x - y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val - y.val :=
+  Scalar.sub_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I8.sub_spec {x y : I8} (hmin : I8.min ≤ x.val - y.val)
+  (hmax : x.val - y.val ≤ I8.max) :
+  ∃ z, x - y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val - y.val :=
+  Scalar.sub_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I16.sub_spec {x y : I16} (hmin : I16.min ≤ x.val - y.val)
+  (hmax : x.val - y.val ≤ I16.max) :
+  ∃ z, x - y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val - y.val :=
+  Scalar.sub_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I32.sub_spec {x y : I32} (hmin : I32.min ≤ x.val - y.val)
+  (hmax : x.val - y.val ≤ I32.max) :
+  ∃ z, x - y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val - y.val :=
+  Scalar.sub_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I64.sub_spec {x y : I64} (hmin : I64.min ≤ x.val - y.val)
+  (hmax : x.val - y.val ≤ I64.max) :
+  ∃ z, x - y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val - y.val :=
+  Scalar.sub_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I128.sub_spec {x y : I128} (hmin : I128.min ≤ x.val - y.val)
+  (hmax : x.val - y.val ≤ I128.max) :
+  ∃ z, x - y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val - y.val :=
+  Scalar.sub_spec hmin hmax
+
 -- Generic theorem - shouldn't be used much
 theorem Scalar.mul_spec {ty} {x y : Scalar ty}
   (hmin : Scalar.min ty ≤ x.val * y.val)
@@ -628,6 +688,36 @@ theorem Scalar.mul_unsigned_spec {ty} (s: ¬ ty.isSigned) {x y : Scalar ty}
   ∃ z, x * y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val * y.val := by
   apply Scalar.mul_unsigned_spec <;> simp only [Scalar.max, *]
 
+@[cepspec] theorem Isize.mul_spec {x y : Isize} (hmin : Isize.min ≤ x.val * y.val)
+  (hmax : x.val * y.val ≤ Isize.max) :
+  ∃ z, x * y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val * y.val :=
+  Scalar.mul_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I8.mul_spec {x y : I8} (hmin : I8.min ≤ x.val * y.val)
+  (hmax : x.val * y.val ≤ I8.max) :
+  ∃ z, x * y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val * y.val :=
+  Scalar.mul_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I16.mul_spec {x y : I16} (hmin : I16.min ≤ x.val * y.val)
+  (hmax : x.val * y.val ≤ I16.max) :
+  ∃ z, x * y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val * y.val :=
+  Scalar.mul_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I32.mul_spec {x y : I32} (hmin : I32.min ≤ x.val * y.val)
+  (hmax : x.val * y.val ≤ I32.max) :
+  ∃ z, x * y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val * y.val :=
+  Scalar.mul_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I64.mul_spec {x y : I64} (hmin : I64.min ≤ x.val * y.val)
+  (hmax : x.val * y.val ≤ I64.max) :
+  ∃ z, x * y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val * y.val :=
+  Scalar.mul_spec hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I128.mul_spec {x y : I128} (hmin : I128.min ≤ x.val * y.val)
+  (hmax : x.val * y.val ≤ I128.max) :
+  ∃ z, x * y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val * y.val :=
+  Scalar.mul_spec hmin hmax
+
 -- Generic theorem - shouldn't be used much
 @[cpspec]
 theorem Scalar.div_spec {ty} {x y : Scalar ty}
@@ -681,6 +771,48 @@ theorem Scalar.div_unsigned_spec {ty} (s: ¬ ty.isSigned) (x : Scalar ty) {y : S
   ∃ z, x / y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val / y.val := by
   apply Scalar.div_unsigned_spec <;> simp [Scalar.max, *]
 
+@[cepspec] theorem Isize.div_spec (x : Isize) {y : Isize}
+  (hnz : y.val ≠ 0)
+  (hmin : Isize.min ≤ scalar_div x.val y.val)
+  (hmax : scalar_div x.val y.val ≤ Isize.max):
+  ∃ z, x / y = ret z ∧ z.val = scalar_div x.val y.val :=
+  Scalar.div_spec hnz hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I8.div_spec (x : I8) {y : I8}
+  (hnz : y.val ≠ 0)
+  (hmin : I8.min ≤ scalar_div x.val y.val)
+  (hmax : scalar_div x.val y.val ≤ I8.max):
+  ∃ z, x / y = ret z ∧ z.val = scalar_div x.val y.val :=
+  Scalar.div_spec hnz hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I16.div_spec (x : I16) {y : I16}
+  (hnz : y.val ≠ 0)
+  (hmin : I16.min ≤ scalar_div x.val y.val)
+  (hmax : scalar_div x.val y.val ≤ I16.max):
+  ∃ z, x / y = ret z ∧ z.val = scalar_div x.val y.val :=
+  Scalar.div_spec hnz hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I32.div_spec (x : I32) {y : I32}
+  (hnz : y.val ≠ 0)
+  (hmin : I32.min ≤ scalar_div x.val y.val)
+  (hmax : scalar_div x.val y.val ≤ I32.max):
+  ∃ z, x / y = ret z ∧ z.val = scalar_div x.val y.val :=
+  Scalar.div_spec hnz hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I64.div_spec (x : I64) {y : I64}
+  (hnz : y.val ≠ 0)
+  (hmin : I64.min ≤ scalar_div x.val y.val)
+  (hmax : scalar_div x.val y.val ≤ I64.max):
+  ∃ z, x / y = ret z ∧ z.val = scalar_div x.val y.val :=
+  Scalar.div_spec hnz hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I128.div_spec (x : I128) {y : I128}
+  (hnz : y.val ≠ 0)
+  (hmin : I128.min ≤ scalar_div x.val y.val)
+  (hmax : scalar_div x.val y.val ≤ I128.max):
+  ∃ z, x / y = ret z ∧ z.val = scalar_div x.val y.val :=
+  Scalar.div_spec hnz hmin hmax
+
 -- Generic theorem - shouldn't be used much
 @[cpspec]
 theorem Scalar.rem_spec {ty} {x y : Scalar ty}
@@ -734,6 +866,41 @@ theorem Scalar.rem_unsigned_spec {ty} (s: ¬ ty.isSigned) (x : Scalar ty) {y : S
   ∃ z, x % y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val % y.val := by
   apply Scalar.rem_unsigned_spec <;> simp [Scalar.max, *]
 
+@[cepspec] theorem I8.rem_spec (x : I8) {y : I8}
+  (hnz : y.val ≠ 0)
+  (hmin : I8.min ≤ scalar_rem x.val y.val)
+  (hmax : scalar_rem x.val y.val ≤ I8.max):
+  ∃ z, x % y = ret z ∧ z.val = scalar_rem x.val y.val :=
+  Scalar.rem_spec hnz hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I16.rem_spec (x : I16) {y : I16}
+  (hnz : y.val ≠ 0)
+  (hmin : I16.min ≤ scalar_rem x.val y.val)
+  (hmax : scalar_rem x.val y.val ≤ I16.max):
+  ∃ z, x % y = ret z ∧ z.val = scalar_rem x.val y.val :=
+  Scalar.rem_spec hnz hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I32.rem_spec (x : I32) {y : I32}
+  (hnz : y.val ≠ 0)
+  (hmin : I32.min ≤ scalar_rem x.val y.val)
+  (hmax : scalar_rem x.val y.val ≤ I32.max):
+  ∃ z, x % y = ret z ∧ z.val = scalar_rem x.val y.val :=
+  Scalar.rem_spec hnz hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I64.rem_spec (x : I64) {y : I64}
+  (hnz : y.val ≠ 0)
+  (hmin : I64.min ≤ scalar_rem x.val y.val)
+  (hmax : scalar_rem x.val y.val ≤ I64.max):
+  ∃ z, x % y = ret z ∧ z.val = scalar_rem x.val y.val :=
+  Scalar.rem_spec hnz hmin hmax
+
+@[cepspec] theorem I128.rem_spec (x : I128) {y : I128}
+  (hnz : y.val ≠ 0)
+  (hmin : I128.min ≤ scalar_rem x.val y.val)
+  (hmax : scalar_rem x.val y.val ≤ I128.max):
+  ∃ z, x % y = ret z ∧ z.val = scalar_rem x.val y.val :=
+  Scalar.rem_spec hnz hmin hmax
+
 -- ofIntCore
 -- TODO: typeclass?
 def Isize.ofIntCore := @Scalar.ofIntCore .Isize
@@ -751,33 +918,34 @@ def U128.ofIntCore  := @Scalar.ofIntCore .U128
 
 --  ofInt
 -- TODO: typeclass?
-def Isize.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .Isize
-def I8.ofInt    := @Scalar.ofInt .I8
-def I16.ofInt   := @Scalar.ofInt .I16
-def I32.ofInt   := @Scalar.ofInt .I32
-def I64.ofInt   := @Scalar.ofInt .I64
-def I128.ofInt  := @Scalar.ofInt .I128
-def Usize.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .Usize
-def U8.ofInt    := @Scalar.ofInt .U8
-def U16.ofInt   := @Scalar.ofInt .U16
-def U32.ofInt   := @Scalar.ofInt .U32
-def U64.ofInt   := @Scalar.ofInt .U64
-def U128.ofInt  := @Scalar.ofInt .U128
-
-postfix:74  "%isize" => Isize.ofInt
-postfix:74  "%i8"    => I8.ofInt
-postfix:74  "%i16"   => I16.ofInt
-postfix:74  "%i32"   => I32.ofInt
-postfix:74  "%i64"   => I64.ofInt
-postfix:74  "%i128"  => I128.ofInt
-postfix:74  "%usize" => Usize.ofInt
-postfix:74  "%u8"    => U8.ofInt
-postfix:74  "%u16"   => U16.ofInt
-postfix:74  "%u32"   => U32.ofInt
-postfix:74  "%u64"   => U64.ofInt
-postfix:74  "%u128"  => U128.ofInt
-
-example : Result U32 := 1%u32 + 2%u32
+abbrev Isize.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .Isize
+abbrev I8.ofInt    := @Scalar.ofInt .I8
+abbrev I16.ofInt   := @Scalar.ofInt .I16
+abbrev I32.ofInt   := @Scalar.ofInt .I32
+abbrev I64.ofInt   := @Scalar.ofInt .I64
+abbrev I128.ofInt  := @Scalar.ofInt .I128
+abbrev Usize.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .Usize
+abbrev U8.ofInt    := @Scalar.ofInt .U8
+abbrev U16.ofInt   := @Scalar.ofInt .U16
+abbrev U32.ofInt   := @Scalar.ofInt .U32
+abbrev U64.ofInt   := @Scalar.ofInt .U64
+abbrev U128.ofInt  := @Scalar.ofInt .U128
+
+postfix:max "#isize" => Isize.ofInt
+postfix:max "#i8"    => I8.ofInt
+postfix:max "#i16"   => I16.ofInt
+postfix:max "#i32"   => I32.ofInt
+postfix:max "#i64"   => I64.ofInt
+postfix:max "#i128"  => I128.ofInt
+postfix:max "#usize" => Usize.ofInt
+postfix:max "#u8"    => U8.ofInt
+postfix:max "#u16"   => U16.ofInt
+postfix:max "#u32"   => U32.ofInt
+postfix:max "#u64"   => U64.ofInt
+postfix:max "#u128"  => U128.ofInt
+
+-- Testing the notations
+example : Result Usize := 0#usize + 1#usize
 
 -- TODO: factor those lemmas out
 @[simp] theorem Scalar.ofInt_val_eq {ty} (h : Scalar.min ty ≤ x ∧ x ≤ Scalar.max ty) : (Scalar.ofInt x h).val = x := by
@@ -819,7 +987,6 @@ example : Result U32 := 1%u32 + 2%u32
 @[simp] theorem U128.ofInt_val_eq (h : Scalar.min ScalarTy.U128 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ Scalar.max ScalarTy.U128) : (U128.ofInt x h).val = x := by
   apply Scalar.ofInt_val_eq h
 
-
 -- Comparisons
 instance {ty} : LT (Scalar ty) where
   lt a b := LT.lt a.val b.val
@@ -847,6 +1014,9 @@ instance (ty : ScalarTy) : DecidableEq (Scalar ty) :=
 instance (ty : ScalarTy) : CoeOut (Scalar ty) Int where
   coe := λ v => v.val
 
+@[simp] theorem Scalar.neq_to_neq_val {ty} : ∀ {i j : Scalar ty}, (¬ i = j) ↔ ¬ i.val = j.val := by
+  intro i j; cases i; cases j; simp
+
 -- -- We now define a type class that subsumes the various machine integer types, so
 -- -- as to write a concise definition for scalar_cast, rather than exhaustively
 -- -- enumerating all of the possible pairs. We remark that Rust has sane semantics
diff --git a/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Base.lean b/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Base.lean
index 6f820a84..76a92795 100644
--- a/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Base.lean
+++ b/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Base.lean
@@ -167,7 +167,8 @@ structure PSpecClassExprAttr where
   deriving Inhabited
 
 -- TODO: the original function doesn't define correctly the `addImportedFn`. Do a PR?
-def mkMapDeclarationExtension [Inhabited α] (name : Name := by exact decl_name%) : IO (MapDeclarationExtension α) :=
+def mkMapDeclarationExtension [Inhabited α] (name : Name := by exact decl_name%) :
+  IO (MapDeclarationExtension α) :=
   registerSimplePersistentEnvExtension {
     name          := name,
     addImportedFn := fun a => a.foldl (fun s a => a.foldl (fun s (k, v) => s.insert k v) s) RBMap.empty,
@@ -175,6 +176,54 @@ def mkMapDeclarationExtension [Inhabited α] (name : Name := by exact decl_name%
     toArrayFn     := fun es => es.toArray.qsort (fun a b => Name.quickLt a.1 b.1)
   }
 
+-- Declare an extension of maps of maps (using [RBMap]).
+-- The important point is that we need to merge the bound values (which are maps).
+def mkMapMapDeclarationExtension [Inhabited β] (ord : α → α → Ordering)
+  (name : Name := by exact decl_name%) :
+  IO (MapDeclarationExtension (RBMap α β ord)) :=
+  registerSimplePersistentEnvExtension {
+    name          := name,
+    addImportedFn := fun a =>
+      a.foldl (fun s a => a.foldl (
+        -- We need to merge the maps
+        fun s (k0, k1_to_v) =>
+        match s.find? k0 with
+        | none =>
+          -- No binding: insert one
+          s.insert k0 k1_to_v
+        | some m =>
+          -- There is already a binding: merge
+          let m := RBMap.fold (fun m k v => m.insert k v) m k1_to_v
+          s.insert k0 m)
+          s) RBMap.empty,
+    addEntryFn    := fun s n => s.insert n.1 n.2 ,
+    toArrayFn     := fun es => es.toArray.qsort (fun a b => Name.quickLt a.1 b.1)
+  }
+
+-- Declare an extension of maps of maps (using [HashMap]).
+-- The important point is that we need to merge the bound values (which are maps).
+def mkMapHashMapDeclarationExtension [BEq α] [Hashable α] [Inhabited β]
+  (name : Name := by exact decl_name%) :
+  IO (MapDeclarationExtension (HashMap α β)) :=
+  registerSimplePersistentEnvExtension {
+    name          := name,
+    addImportedFn := fun a =>
+      a.foldl (fun s a => a.foldl (
+        -- We need to merge the maps
+        fun s (k0, k1_to_v) =>
+        match s.find? k0 with
+        | none =>
+          -- No binding: insert one
+          s.insert k0 k1_to_v
+        | some m =>
+          -- There is already a binding: merge
+          let m := HashMap.fold (fun m k v => m.insert k v) m k1_to_v
+          s.insert k0 m)
+          s) RBMap.empty,
+    addEntryFn    := fun s n => s.insert n.1 n.2 ,
+    toArrayFn     := fun es => es.toArray.qsort (fun a b => Name.quickLt a.1 b.1)
+  }
+
 /- The persistent map from function to pspec theorems. -/
 initialize pspecAttr : PSpecAttr ← do
   let ext ← mkMapDeclarationExtension `pspecMap
@@ -200,7 +249,8 @@ initialize pspecAttr : PSpecAttr ← do
 
 /- The persistent map from type classes to pspec theorems -/
 initialize pspecClassAttr : PSpecClassAttr ← do
-  let ext : MapDeclarationExtension (NameMap Name) ← mkMapDeclarationExtension `pspecClassMap
+  let ext : MapDeclarationExtension (NameMap Name) ←
+    mkMapMapDeclarationExtension Name.quickCmp `pspecClassMap
   let attrImpl : AttributeImpl  := {
     name := `cpspec
     descr := "Marks theorems to use for type classes with the `progress` tactic"
@@ -231,7 +281,8 @@ initialize pspecClassAttr : PSpecClassAttr ← do
 
 /- The 2nd persistent map from type classes to pspec theorems -/
 initialize pspecClassExprAttr : PSpecClassExprAttr ← do
-  let ext : MapDeclarationExtension (HashMap Expr Name) ← mkMapDeclarationExtension `pspecClassExprMap
+  let ext : MapDeclarationExtension (HashMap Expr Name) ←
+    mkMapHashMapDeclarationExtension `pspecClassExprMap
   let attrImpl : AttributeImpl  := {
     name := `cepspec
     descr := "Marks theorems to use for type classes with the `progress` tactic"
diff --git a/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Progress.lean b/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Progress.lean
index 6a4729dc..8b0759c5 100644
--- a/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Progress.lean
+++ b/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Progress.lean
@@ -110,8 +110,9 @@ def progressWith (fExpr : Expr) (th : TheoremOrLocal)
     -- then continue splitting the post-condition
     splitEqAndPost fun hEq hPost ids => do
     trace[Progress] "eq and post:\n{hEq} : {← inferType hEq}\n{hPost}"
-    simpAt [] [``Primitives.bind_tc_ret, ``Primitives.bind_tc_fail, ``Primitives.bind_tc_div]
-           [hEq.fvarId!] (.targets #[] true)
+    tryTac (
+      simpAt [] [``Primitives.bind_tc_ret, ``Primitives.bind_tc_fail, ``Primitives.bind_tc_div]
+             [hEq.fvarId!] (.targets #[] true))
     -- Clear the equality, unless the user requests not to do so
     let mgoal ← do
       if keep.isSome then getMainGoal
@@ -242,21 +243,26 @@ def progressAsmsOrLookupTheorem (keep : Option Name) (withTh : Option TheoremOrL
     tryLookupApply keep ids splitPost asmTac fExpr "pspec theorem" pspec do
     -- It failed: try to lookup a *class* expr spec theorem (those are more
     -- specific than class spec theorems)
+    trace[Progress] "Failed using a pspec theorem: trying to lookup a pspec class expr theorem"
     let pspecClassExpr ← do
       match getFirstArg args with
       | none => pure none
       | some arg => do
+        trace[Progress] "Using: f:{fName}, arg: {arg}"
         let thName ← pspecClassExprAttr.find? fName arg
         pure (thName.map fun th => .Theorem th)
     tryLookupApply keep ids splitPost asmTac fExpr "pspec class expr theorem" pspecClassExpr do
     -- It failed: try to lookup a *class* spec theorem
+    trace[Progress] "Failed using a pspec class expr theorem: trying to lookup a pspec class theorem"
     let pspecClass ← do
       match ← getFirstArgAppName args with
       | none => pure none
       | some argName => do
+        trace[Progress] "Using: f: {fName}, arg: {argName}"
         let thName ← pspecClassAttr.find? fName argName
         pure (thName.map fun th => .Theorem th)
     tryLookupApply keep ids splitPost asmTac fExpr "pspec class theorem" pspecClass do
+    trace[Progress] "Failed using a pspec class theorem: trying to use a recursive assumption"
     -- Try a recursive call - we try the assumptions of kind "auxDecl"
     let ctx ← Lean.MonadLCtx.getLCtx
     let decls ← ctx.getAllDecls
@@ -314,12 +320,14 @@ def evalProgress (args : TSyntax `Progress.progressArgs) : TacticM Unit := do
     else pure none
   let ids :=
     let args := asArgs.getArgs
-    let args := (args.get! 2).getSepArgs
-    args.map (λ s => if s.isIdent then some s.getId else none)
+    if args.size > 2 then
+      let args := (args.get! 2).getSepArgs
+      args.map (λ s => if s.isIdent then some s.getId else none)
+    else #[]
   trace[Progress] "User-provided ids: {ids}"
   let splitPost : Bool :=
     let args := asArgs.getArgs
-    (args.get! 3).getArgs.size > 0
+    args.size > 3 ∧ (args.get! 3).getArgs.size > 0
   trace[Progress] "Split post: {splitPost}"
   /- For scalarTac we have a fast track: if the goal is not a linear
      arithmetic goal, we skip (note that otherwise, scalarTac would try
@@ -343,11 +351,14 @@ elab "progress" args:progressArgs : tactic =>
 namespace Test
   open Primitives Result
 
-  set_option trace.Progress true
-  set_option pp.rawOnError true
+  -- Show the traces
+  -- set_option trace.Progress true
+  -- set_option pp.rawOnError true
 
-  #eval showStoredPSpec
-  #eval showStoredPSpecClass
+  -- The following commands display the databases of theorems
+  -- #eval showStoredPSpec
+  -- #eval showStoredPSpecClass
+  -- #eval showStoredPSpecExprClass
 
   example {ty} {x y : Scalar ty}
     (hmin : Scalar.min ty ≤ x.val + y.val)
@@ -363,6 +374,12 @@ namespace Test
     progress keep h with Scalar.add_spec as ⟨ z ⟩
     simp [*, h]
 
+  example {x y : U32}
+    (hmax : x.val + y.val ≤ U32.max) :
+    ∃ z, x + y = ret z ∧ z.val = x.val + y.val := by
+    progress keep _ as ⟨ z, h1 .. ⟩
+    simp [*, h1]
+
   /- Checking that universe instantiation works: the original spec uses
      `α : Type u` where u is quantified, while here we use `α : Type 0` -/
   example {α : Type} (v: Vec α) (i: Usize) (x : α)
diff --git a/backends/lean/Base/Utils.lean b/backends/lean/Base/Utils.lean
index 1f8f1455..5224e1c3 100644
--- a/backends/lean/Base/Utils.lean
+++ b/backends/lean/Base/Utils.lean
@@ -301,6 +301,10 @@ example : Nat := by
 example (x : Bool) : Nat := by
   cases x <;> custom_let x := 3 <;> apply x
 
+-- Attempt to apply a tactic
+def tryTac (tac : TacticM Unit) : TacticM Unit := do
+  let _ ← tryTactic tac
+
 -- Repeatedly apply a tactic
 partial def repeatTac (tac : TacticM Unit) : TacticM Unit := do
   try
diff --git a/backends/lean/lake-manifest.json b/backends/lean/lake-manifest.json
index 5a089838..934ee2d9 100644
--- a/backends/lean/lake-manifest.json
+++ b/backends/lean/lake-manifest.json
@@ -1,39 +1,51 @@
-{"version": 4,
+{"version": 5,
  "packagesDir": "lake-packages",
  "packages":
  [{"git":
    {"url": "https://github.com/EdAyers/ProofWidgets4",
     "subDir?": null,
-    "rev": "c43db94a8f495dad37829e9d7ad65483d68c86b8",
+    "rev": "a0c2cd0ac3245a0dade4f925bcfa97e06dd84229",
+    "opts": {},
     "name": "proofwidgets",
-    "inputRev?": "v0.0.11"}},
+    "inputRev?": "v0.0.13",
+    "inherited": true}},
   {"git":
    {"url": "https://github.com/mhuisi/lean4-cli.git",
     "subDir?": null,
-    "rev": "5a858c32963b6b19be0d477a30a1f4b6c120be7e",
+    "rev": "21dac2e9cc7e3cf7da5800814787b833e680b2fd",
+    "opts": {},
     "name": "Cli",
-    "inputRev?": "nightly"}},
+    "inputRev?": "nightly",
+    "inherited": true}},
   {"git":
    {"url": "https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4.git",
     "subDir?": null,
-    "rev": "fa05951a270fef2873666c46f138e90338cd48d6",
+    "rev": "226948a52f8e19ad95ff6025a96784d7e7ed6ed0",
+    "opts": {},
     "name": "mathlib",
-    "inputRev?": null}},
+    "inputRev?": null,
+    "inherited": false}},
   {"git":
    {"url": "https://github.com/gebner/quote4",
     "subDir?": null,
-    "rev": "c0d9516f44d07feee01c1103c8f2f7c24a822b55",
+    "rev": "e75daed95ad1c92af4e577fea95e234d7a8401c1",
+    "opts": {},
     "name": "Qq",
-    "inputRev?": "master"}},
+    "inputRev?": "master",
+    "inherited": true}},
   {"git":
    {"url": "https://github.com/JLimperg/aesop",
     "subDir?": null,
-    "rev": "f04538ab6ad07642368cf11d2702acc0a9b4bcee",
+    "rev": "1a0cded2be292b5496e659b730d2accc742de098",
+    "opts": {},
     "name": "aesop",
-    "inputRev?": "master"}},
+    "inputRev?": "master",
+    "inherited": true}},
   {"git":
    {"url": "https://github.com/leanprover/std4",
     "subDir?": null,
-    "rev": "dff883c55395438ae2a5c65ad5ddba084b600feb",
+    "rev": "ba5e5e3af519b4fc5221ad0fa4b2c87276f1d323",
+    "opts": {},
     "name": "std",
-    "inputRev?": "main"}}]}
+    "inputRev?": "main",
+    "inherited": true}}]}
diff --git a/backends/lean/lean-toolchain b/backends/lean/lean-toolchain
index 334c5053..fbca4d37 100644
--- a/backends/lean/lean-toolchain
+++ b/backends/lean/lean-toolchain
@@ -1 +1 @@
-leanprover/lean4:nightly-2023-07-12
-\ No newline at end of file
+leanprover/lean4:v4.0.0
+\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/compiler/Extract.ml b/compiler/Extract.ml
index b56d8c51..ac81d6f3 100644
--- a/compiler/Extract.ml
+++ b/compiler/Extract.ml
@@ -929,9 +929,12 @@ let mk_formatter (ctx : trans_ctx) (crate_name : string)
                 ("(" ^ Z.to_string sv.PV.value
                 ^ if !backend = Lean then ":Int" else "" ^ ")");
             (match !backend with
-            | Coq | Lean ->
-                let iname = String.lowercase_ascii (int_name sv.PV.int_ty) in
+            | Coq ->
+                let iname = int_name sv.PV.int_ty in
                 F.pp_print_string fmt ("%" ^ iname)
+            | Lean ->
+                let iname = String.lowercase_ascii (int_name sv.PV.int_ty) in
+                F.pp_print_string fmt ("#" ^ iname)
             | HOL4 -> ()
             | _ -> raise (Failure "Unreachable"));
             if print_brackets then F.pp_print_string fmt ")")
diff --git a/tests/lean/Hashmap/Properties.lean b/tests/lean/Hashmap/Properties.lean
index 6bc821d3..4db54316 100644
--- a/tests/lean/Hashmap/Properties.lean
+++ b/tests/lean/Hashmap/Properties.lean
@@ -330,12 +330,7 @@ theorem insert_no_resize_spec {α : Type} (hm : HashMap α) (key : Usize) (value
         simp_all
         simp [inv] at hinv
         int_tac
-      -- TODO: progress fails in command line mode with "index out of bounds"
-      -- and I have no idea how to fix this. The error happens after progress
-      -- introduced the new goals. It must be when we exit the "withApp", etc.
-      -- helpers.
-      -- progress as ⟨ z, hp ⟩
-      have ⟨ z, hp ⟩ := Usize.add_spec hbounds
+      progress as ⟨ z, hp ⟩
       simp [hp]
     else
       simp [*, Pure.pure]
@@ -406,7 +401,7 @@ theorem insert_no_resize_spec {α : Type} (hm : HashMap α) (key : Usize) (value
     -- TODO: canonize addition by default? We need a tactic to simplify arithmetic equalities
     -- with addition and substractions ((ℤ, +) is a group or something - there should exist a tactic
     -- somewhere in mathlib?)
-    simp [Int.add_assoc, Int.add_comm, Int.add_left_comm] <;>
+    (try simp [Int.add_assoc, Int.add_comm, Int.add_left_comm]) <;>
     int_tac
   have hinv : inv nhm := by
     simp [inv] at *
diff --git a/tests/lean/Tutorial.lean b/tests/lean/Tutorial.lean
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..840a606e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/lean/Tutorial.lean
@@ -0,0 +1,389 @@
+/- A tutorial about using Lean to verify properties of programs generated by Aeneas -/
+import Base
+
+open Primitives
+open Result
+
+namespace Tutorial
+
+/-#===========================================================================#
+  #
+  #     Simple Arithmetic Example
+  #
+  #===========================================================================#-/
+
+/- As a first example, let's consider the function below.
+ -/
+
+def mul2_add1 (x : U32) : Result U32 := do
+  let x1 ← x + x
+  let x2 ← x1 + 1#u32
+  ret x2
+
+/- There are several things to note.
+
+   # Machine integers
+   ==================
+   Because Rust programs manipulate machine integers which occupy a fixed
+   size in memory, we model integers by using types like [U32], which is
+   the type of integers which take their values between 0 and 2^32 - 1 (inclusive).
+   [1#u32] is simply the constant 1 (seen as a [U32]).
+
+   You can see a definition or its type by using the [#print] and [#check] commands.
+   It is also possible to jump to definitions (right-click + "Go to Definition"
+   in VS Code).
+
+   For instance, you can see below that [U32] is defined in terms of a more generic
+   type [Scalar] (just move the cursor to the [#print] command below).
+
+ -/
+#print U32 -- This shows the definition of [U32]
+
+#check mul2_add1 -- This shows the type of [mul2_add1]
+#print mul2_add1 -- This show the full definition of [mul2_add1]
+
+/- # Syntax
+   ========
+   Because machine integers are bounded, arithmetic operations can fail, for instance
+   because of an overflow: this is the reason why the output of [mul2_add1] uses
+   the [Result] type. In particular, addition can fail.
+
+   We use a lightweight "do"-notation to write code which calls potentially failing
+   functions. In practice, all our function bodies start with a [do] keyword,
+   which enables using this lightweight syntax. After the [do], instead of writing
+   let-bindings as [let x1 := ...], we write them as: [let x1 ← ...]. We also
+   have lightweight notations for common operations like the addition.
+
+   For instance, in [let x1 ← x + x], the [x + x] expression desugars to
+   [Scalar.add x x] and the [let x1 ← ...] desugars to a call to [bind].
+
+   The definition of [bind x f] is worth investigating. It simply checks whether
+   [x : Result ...] successfully evaluates to some value, in which case it
+   calls [f] with this value, and propagates the error otherwise. See the output
+   of the [#print] command below.
+
+   *Remark:* in order to type the left-arrow symbol [←] you can type: [\l]. Generally
+   speaking, your editor can tell you how to type the symbols you see in Lean
+   code. For instance in VS Code, you can simply hover your mouse over the
+   symbol and a pop-up window will open displaying all the information you need.
+ -/
+#print Primitives.bind
+
+/- We show a desugared version of [mul2_add1] below: we remove the syntactic
+   sugar, and inline the definition of [bind] to make the matches over the
+   results explicit.
+ -/
+def mul2_add1_desugared (x : U32) : Result U32 :=
+  match Scalar.add x x with
+  | ret x1 => -- Success case
+    match Scalar.add x1 (U32.ofInt 1) with
+    | ret x2 => ret x2
+    | error => error
+  | error => error -- Propagating the errors
+
+/- Now that we have seen how [mul2_add1] is defined precisely, we can prove
+   simple properties about it. For instance, what about proving that it evaluates
+   to [2 * x + 1]?
+
+   We advise writing specifications in a Hoare-logic style, that is with
+   preconditions (requirements which must be satisfied by the inputs upon
+   calling the function) and postconditions (properties that we know about
+   the output after the function call).
+
+   In the case of [mul2_add1] we could state the theorem as follows.
+ -/
+
+theorem mul2_add1_spec
+  -- The input
+  (x : U32)
+  /- The precondition (we give it the name "h" to be able to refer to it in the proof).
+     We simply state that [2 * x + 1] must not overflow.
+
+     The ↑ notation ("\u") is used to coerce values. Here, we coerce [x], which is
+     a bounded machine integer, to an unbounded mathematical integer, which is
+     easier to work with. Note that writing [↑x] is the same as writing [x.val].
+   -/
+  (h : 2 * ↑x + 1 ≤ U32.max)
+  /- The postcondition -/
+  : ∃ y, mul2_add1 x = ret y ∧  -- The call succeeds
+  ↑ y = 2 * ↑x + (1 : Int)   -- The output has the expected value
+  := by
+  /- The proof -/
+  -- Start by a call to the rewriting tactic to reveal the body of [mul2_add1]
+  rw [mul2_add1]
+  /- Here we use the fact that if [x + x] doesn't overflow, then the addition
+     succeeds and returns the value we expect, as given by the theorem [U32.add_spec].
+     Doing this properly requires a few manipulations: we need to instantiate
+     the theorem, introduce it in the context, destruct it to introduce [x1], etc.
+     We automate this with the [progress] tactic: [progress with th as ⟨ x1 .. ⟩]
+     uses theorem [th], instantiates it properly by looking at the goal, renames
+     the output to [x1] and further decomposes the postcondition of [th].
+
+     Note that it is possible to provide more inputs to name the assumptions
+     introduced by the postcondition (for instance: [as ⟨ x1, h ⟩]).
+
+     If you look at the goal after the call to [progress], you wil see that:
+     - there is a new variable [x1] and an assumption stating that [↑x1 = ↑x + ↑x]
+     - the call [x + x] disappeared from the goal: we "progressed" by one step
+
+     Remark: the theorem [U32.add_spec] actually has a precondition, namely that
+     the addition doesn't overflow.
+     In the present case, [progress] manages to prove this automatically by using
+     the fact that [2 * x + 1 < U32.max]. In case [progress] fails to prove a
+     precondition, it leaves it as a subgoal.
+   -/
+  progress with U32.add_spec as ⟨ x1 ⟩
+  /- We can call [progress] a second time for the second addition -/
+  progress with U32.add_spec as ⟨ x2 ⟩
+  /- We are now left with the remaining goal. We do this by calling the simplifier
+     then [scalar_tac], a tactic to solve arithmetic problems:
+   -/
+  simp at *
+  scalar_tac
+
+/- The proof above works, but it can actually be simplified a bit. In particular,
+   it is a bit tedious to specify that [progress] should use [U32.add_spec], while
+   in most situations the theorem to use is obvious by looking at the function.
+
+   For this reason, we provide the possibility of registering theorems in a database
+   so that [progress] can automatically look them up. This is done by marking
+   theorems with custom attributes, like [pspec] below.
+
+   Theorems in the standard library like [U32.add_spec] have already been marked with such
+   attributes, meaning we don't need to tell [progress] to use them.
+ -/
+@[pspec] -- the [pspec] attribute saves the theorem in a database, for [progress] to use it
+theorem mul2_add1_spec2 (x : U32) (h : 2 * ↑x + 1 ≤ U32.max)
+  : ∃ y, mul2_add1 x = ret y ∧
+  ↑ y = 2 * ↑x + (1 : Int)
+  := by
+  rw [mul2_add1]
+  progress as ⟨ x1 .. ⟩ -- [progress] automatically lookups [U32.add_spec]
+  progress as ⟨ x2 .. ⟩ -- same
+  simp at *; scalar_tac
+
+/- Because we marked [mul2_add1_spec2] theorem with [pspec], [progress] can
+   now automatically look it up. For instance, below:
+ -/
+-- A dummy function which uses [mul2_add1]
+def use_mul2_add1 (x : U32) (y : U32) : Result U32 := do
+  let x1 ← mul2_add1 x
+  x1 + y
+
+@[pspec]
+theorem use_mul2_add1_spec (x : U32) (y : U32) (h : 2 * ↑x + 1 + ↑y ≤ U32.max) :
+  ∃ z, use_mul2_add1 x y = ret z ∧
+  ↑z = 2 * ↑x + (1 : Int) + ↑y := by
+  rw [use_mul2_add1]
+  -- Here we use [progress] on [mul2_add1]
+  progress as ⟨ x1 .. ⟩
+  progress as ⟨ z .. ⟩
+  simp at *; scalar_tac
+
+
+/-#===========================================================================#
+  #
+  #     Recursion
+  #
+  #===========================================================================#-/
+
+/- We can have a look at more complex examples, for example recursive functions. -/
+
+/- A custom list type.
+
+   Original Rust code:
+   ```
+   pub enum CList<T> {
+    CCons(T, Box<CList<T>>),
+    CNil,
+   }
+   ```
+-/
+inductive CList (T : Type) :=
+| CCons : T → CList T → CList T
+| CNil : CList T
+
+-- Open the [CList] namespace, so that we can write [CCons] instead of [CList.CCons]
+open CList
+
+/- A function accessing the ith element of a list.
+
+   Original Rust code:
+   ```
+   pub fn list_nth<'a, T>(l: &'a CList<T>, i: u32) -> &'a T {
+      match l {
+          List::CCons(x, tl) => {
+              if i == 0 {
+                  return x;
+              } else {
+                  return list_nth(tl, i - 1);
+              }
+          }
+          List::CNil => {
+              panic!()
+          }
+      }
+   }
+   ```
+ -/
+divergent def list_nth (T : Type) (l : CList T) (i : U32) : Result T :=
+  match l with
+  | CCons x tl =>
+    if i = 0#u32
+    then ret x
+    else do
+      let i1 ← i - 1#u32
+      list_nth T tl i1
+  | CNil => fail Error.panic
+
+/- Conversion to Lean's standard list type.
+
+   Note that because we use the suffix "CList.", we can use the notation [l.to_list]
+   if [l] has type [CList ...].
+ -/
+def CList.to_list {α : Type} (x : CList α) : List α :=
+  match x with
+  | CNil => []
+  | CCons hd tl => hd :: tl.to_list
+
+/- Let's prove that [list_nth] indeed accesses the ith element of the list.
+
+   Remark: the parameter [Inhabited T] tells us that we must have an instance of the
+   typeclass [Inhabited] for the type [T].  As of today we can only use [index] with
+   inhabited types, that is to say types which are not empty (i.e., for which it is
+   possible to construct a value - for instance, [Int] is inhabited because we can exhibit
+   the value [0: Int]). This is a technical detail.
+
+   Remark: we didn't mention it before, but we advise always writing inequalities
+   in the same direction (that is: use [<] and not [>]), because it helps the simplifier.
+   More specifically, if you have the assumption that [x > y] in the context, the simplifier
+   may not be able to rewrite [y < x] to [⊤].
+ -/
+theorem list_nth_spec {T : Type} [Inhabited T] (l : CList T) (i : U32)
+  -- Precondition: the index is in bounds
+  (h : ↑i < l.to_list.len)
+  -- Postcondition
+  : ∃ x, list_nth T l i = ret x ∧
+  -- [x] is the ith element of [l] after conversion to [List]
+  x = l.to_list.index ↑i
+  := by
+  -- Here we have to be careful when unfolding the body of [list_nth]: we could
+  -- use the [simp] tactic, but it will sometimes loop on recursive definitions.
+  rw [list_nth]
+  -- Let's simply follow the structure of the function, by first matching on [l]
+  match l with
+  | CNil =>
+    -- We can't get there: we can derive a contradiction from the precondition:
+    -- we have that [i < 0] (because [i < CNil.to_list.len]) and at the same
+    -- time [0 ≤ i] (because [i] is a [U32] unsigned integer).
+    -- First, let's simplify [to_list CNil] to [0]
+    simp [CList.to_list] at h
+    -- Proving we have a contradiction
+    scalar_tac
+  | CCons hd tl =>
+    -- Simplify the match
+    simp only []
+    -- Perform a case disjunction on [i].
+    -- The notation [hi : ...] allows us to introduce an assumption in the
+    -- context, to remember the fact that in the branches we have [i = 0#u32]
+    -- and [¬ i = 0#u32].
+    if hi: i = 0#u32 then
+      -- We can finish the proof simply by using the simplifier.
+      -- We decompose the proof into several calls on purpose, so that it is
+      -- easier to understand what is going on.
+      -- Simplify the condition and the [if then else]
+      simp [hi]
+      -- Prove the final equality
+      simp [CList.to_list]
+    else
+      -- The interesting branch
+      -- Simplify the condition and the [if then else]
+      simp [hi]
+      -- i0 := i - 1
+      progress as ⟨ i1, hi1 ⟩
+      -- [progress] can handle recursion
+      simp [CList.to_list] at h -- we need to simplify this inequality to prove the precondition
+      progress as ⟨ l1 ⟩
+      -- Proving the postcondition
+      -- We need this to trigger the simplification of [index to.to_list i.val]
+      --
+      -- Among other things, the call to [simp] below will apply the theorem
+      -- [List.index_nzero_cons], which has the precondition [i.val ≠ 0]. [simp]
+      -- can automatically use the assumptions/theorems we give it to prove
+      -- preconditions when applying rewriting lemmas. In the present case,
+      -- by giving it [*] as argument, we tell [simp] to use all the assumptions
+      -- to perform rewritings. In particular, it will use [i.val ≠ 0] to
+      -- apply [List.index_nzero_cons].
+      have : i.val ≠ 0 := by scalar_tac -- Remark: [simp at hi] also works
+      simp [CList.to_list, *]
+
+/-#===========================================================================#
+  #
+  #     Partial Functions
+  #
+  #===========================================================================#-/
+
+/- Recursive functions may not terminate on all inputs.
+
+   For instance, the function below only terminates on positive inputs (note
+   that we switched to signed integers), in which cases it behaves like the
+   identity. When we need to define such a potentially partial function,
+   we use the [divergent] keyword, which means that the function may diverge
+   (i.e., infinitely loop).
+
+   We will skip the details of how [divergent] precisely handles non-termination.
+   All you need to know is that the [Result] type has actually 3 cases (we saw
+   the first 2 cases in the examples above):
+   - [ret]: successful computation
+   - [fail]: failure (panic because of overflow, etc.)
+   - [div]: the computation doesn't terminate
+
+   If in a theorem we state and prove that:
+   ```
+   ∃ y, i32_id x = ret x
+   ```
+   we not only prove that the function doesn't fail, but also that it terminates.
+
+   *Remark*: in practice, whenever Aeneas generates a recursive function, it
+   annotates it with the [divergent] keyword.
+ -/
+divergent def i32_id (x : I32) : Result I32 :=
+  if x = 0#i32 then ret 0#i32
+  else do
+    let x1 ← x - 1#i32
+    let x2 ← i32_id x1
+    x2 + 1#i32
+
+/- We can easily prove that [i32_id] behaves like the identity on positive inputs -/
+theorem i32_id_spec (x : I32) (h : 0 ≤ x.val) :
+  ∃ y, i32_id x = ret y ∧ x.val = y.val := by
+  rw [i32_id]
+  if hx : x = 0#i32 then
+    simp_all
+  else
+    simp [hx]
+    -- x - 1
+    progress as ⟨ x1 ⟩
+    -- Recursive call
+    progress as ⟨ x2 ⟩
+    -- x2 + 1
+    progress
+    -- Postcondition
+    simp; scalar_tac
+-- Below: we have to prove that the recursive call performed in the proof terminates.
+-- Otherwise, we could prove any result we want by simply writing a theorem which
+-- uses itself in the proof.
+--
+-- We first specify a decreasing value. Here, we state that [x], seen as a natural number,
+-- decreases at every recursive call.
+termination_by i32_id_spec x _ => x.val.toNat
+-- And we now have to prove that it indeed decreases - you can skip this for now.
+decreasing_by
+  -- We first need to "massage" the goal (in practice, all the proofs of [decreasing_by]
+  -- should start with a call to [simp_wf]).
+  simp_wf
+  -- Finish the proof
+  have : 1 ≤ x.val := by scalar_tac
+  simp [Int.toNat_sub_of_le, *]
+
+end Tutorial
diff --git a/tests/lean/lake-manifest.json b/tests/lean/lake-manifest.json
index 94030cb6..5c20ec3b 100644
--- a/tests/lean/lake-manifest.json
+++ b/tests/lean/lake-manifest.json
@@ -1,40 +1,56 @@
-{"version": 4,
+{"version": 5,
  "packagesDir": "lake-packages",
  "packages":
  [{"git":
    {"url": "https://github.com/EdAyers/ProofWidgets4",
     "subDir?": null,
-    "rev": "c43db94a8f495dad37829e9d7ad65483d68c86b8",
+    "rev": "a0c2cd0ac3245a0dade4f925bcfa97e06dd84229",
+    "opts": {},
     "name": "proofwidgets",
-    "inputRev?": "v0.0.11"}},
-  {"path": {"name": "Base", "dir": "./../../backends/lean"}},
+    "inputRev?": "v0.0.13",
+    "inherited": true}},
+  {"path":
+   {"opts": {},
+    "name": "Base",
+    "inherited": false,
+    "dir": "./../../backends/lean"}},
   {"git":
    {"url": "https://github.com/mhuisi/lean4-cli.git",
     "subDir?": null,
-    "rev": "5a858c32963b6b19be0d477a30a1f4b6c120be7e",
+    "rev": "21dac2e9cc7e3cf7da5800814787b833e680b2fd",
+    "opts": {},
     "name": "Cli",
-    "inputRev?": "nightly"}},
+    "inputRev?": "nightly",
+    "inherited": true}},
   {"git":
    {"url": "https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4.git",
     "subDir?": null,
-    "rev": "fa05951a270fef2873666c46f138e90338cd48d6",
+    "rev": "b639e46a19a0328adfb9b1fdf8cbe39dfc1de76b",
+    "opts": {},
     "name": "mathlib",
-    "inputRev?": null}},
+    "inputRev?": null,
+    "inherited": false}},
   {"git":
    {"url": "https://github.com/gebner/quote4",
     "subDir?": null,
-    "rev": "c0d9516f44d07feee01c1103c8f2f7c24a822b55",
+    "rev": "e75daed95ad1c92af4e577fea95e234d7a8401c1",
+    "opts": {},
     "name": "Qq",
-    "inputRev?": "master"}},
+    "inputRev?": "master",
+    "inherited": true}},
   {"git":
    {"url": "https://github.com/JLimperg/aesop",
     "subDir?": null,
-    "rev": "f04538ab6ad07642368cf11d2702acc0a9b4bcee",
+    "rev": "1a0cded2be292b5496e659b730d2accc742de098",
+    "opts": {},
     "name": "aesop",
-    "inputRev?": "master"}},
+    "inputRev?": "master",
+    "inherited": true}},
   {"git":
    {"url": "https://github.com/leanprover/std4",
     "subDir?": null,
-    "rev": "dff883c55395438ae2a5c65ad5ddba084b600feb",
+    "rev": "ba5e5e3af519b4fc5221ad0fa4b2c87276f1d323",
+    "opts": {},
     "name": "std",
-    "inputRev?": "main"}}]}
+    "inputRev?": "main",
+    "inherited": true}}]}
diff --git a/tests/lean/lakefile.lean b/tests/lean/lakefile.lean
index 1747c581..fef94971 100644
--- a/tests/lean/lakefile.lean
+++ b/tests/lean/lakefile.lean
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ require Base from "../../backends/lean"
 
 package «tests» {}
 
+@[default_target] lean_lib tutorial
 @[default_target] lean_lib betreeMain
 @[default_target] lean_lib constants
 @[default_target] lean_lib external
diff --git a/tests/lean/lean-toolchain b/tests/lean/lean-toolchain
index 334c5053..fbca4d37 100644
--- a/tests/lean/lean-toolchain
+++ b/tests/lean/lean-toolchain
@@ -1 +1 @@
-leanprover/lean4:nightly-2023-07-12
-\ No newline at end of file
+leanprover/lean4:v4.0.0
+\ No newline at end of file