summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/compiler
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSon Ho2023-09-16 22:50:19 +0200
committerSon Ho2023-09-16 22:50:19 +0200
commit515d95d786fed13c300b9e0d7619711ee6aaf971 (patch)
tree98d04b53e410b43f01b5840050401c0162662a52 /compiler
parente6e749d47f05a6d48625c305b6af132440382efb (diff)
Add a strict_names_map in the extraction_ctx
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler')
-rw-r--r--compiler/ExtractBase.ml55
-rw-r--r--compiler/Translate.ml14
2 files changed, 52 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/ExtractBase.ml b/compiler/ExtractBase.ml
index 28928325..15acc492 100644
--- a/compiler/ExtractBase.ml
+++ b/compiler/ExtractBase.ml
@@ -467,6 +467,8 @@ type id =
(** Used for stored various strings like keywords, definitions which
should always be in context, etc. and which can't be linked to one
of the above.
+
+ TODO: rename to "keyword"
*)
[@@deriving show, ord]
@@ -512,6 +514,14 @@ type names_map = {
*)
}
+let empty_names_map : names_map =
+ {
+ id_to_name = IdMap.empty;
+ name_to_id = StringMap.empty;
+ names_set = StringSet.empty;
+ opaque_ids = IdSet.empty;
+ }
+
(** Small helper to report name collision *)
let report_name_collision (id_to_string : id -> string) (id1 : id) (id2 : id)
(name : string) : unit =
@@ -645,6 +655,15 @@ type extraction_ctx = {
unsafe_names_map : unsafe_names_map;
(** The map for id to names, where we allow name collisions
(ex.: we might allow record field name collisions). *)
+ strict_names_map : names_map;
+ (** This map is a sub-map of [names_map]. For the ids in this map we also
+ forbid collisions with names in the [unsafe_names_map].
+
+ We do so for keywords for instance, but also for types (in a dependently
+ typed language, we might have an issue if the field of a record has, say,
+ the name "u32", and another field of the same record refers to "u32"
+ (for instance in its type).
+ *)
fmt : formatter;
indent_incr : int;
(** The indent increment we insert whenever we need to indent more *)
@@ -849,6 +868,11 @@ let id_to_string (id : id) (ctx : extraction_ctx) : string =
^ fun_name
| TraitSelfClauseId -> "trait_self_clause"
+(** Return [true] if we are strict on collisions for this id (i.e., we forbid
+ collisions even with the ids in the unsafe names map) *)
+let strict_collisions (id : id) : bool =
+ match id with UnknownId | TypeId _ -> true | _ -> false
+
(** We might not check for collisions for some specific ids (ex.: field names) *)
let allow_collisions (id : id) : bool =
match id with
@@ -866,9 +890,9 @@ let ctx_add (is_opaque : bool) (id : id) (name : string) (ctx : extraction_ctx)
We notably use it for field names: some backends like Lean can use the
type information to disambiguate field projections.
- Remark: what we do is actually subtle. Taking the example of fields:
- - we allow fields from different ADT definitions to collide
- - we do *not* allow field names to collide with other names
+ Remark: we still need to check that those "unsafe" ids don't collide with
+ the ids that we mark as "strict on collision".
+
For instance, we don't allow naming a field "let". We enforce this by
not checking collision between ids for which we permit collisions (ex.:
between fields), but still checking collisions between those ids and the
@@ -876,29 +900,26 @@ let ctx_add (is_opaque : bool) (id : id) (name : string) (ctx : extraction_ctx)
*)
if allow_collisions id then (
assert (not is_opaque);
- (* Check with the other ids *)
- names_map_check_collision id_to_string id name ctx.names_map;
+ (* Check with the ids which are considered to be strict on collisions *)
+ names_map_check_collision id_to_string id name ctx.strict_names_map;
{
ctx with
unsafe_names_map = unsafe_names_map_add id name ctx.unsafe_names_map;
})
else
- (* Remark: we don't check that there are no collisions with the unsafe ids.
- Importantly, we don't want some safe ids like keywords to clash with
- unsafe ids like fields names. For this, we leverage the fact that we register
- keywords *first*, then unsafe ids (meaning the clash will be detected with
- the check in the other branch of the if ... then ... else ..., and we do
- have to check for all possible collisions, which may be slightly too
- restrictive).
-
- TODO: this is a bit hacky, we might want to improve the way we detect
- clashes by being more precise. Overall, there is only an issue with
- field names which are allowed to clash with each other.
+ (* Remark: if we are strict on collisions:
+ - we add the id to the strict collisions map
+ - we check that the id doesn't collide with the unsafe map
*)
+ let strict_names_map =
+ if strict_collisions id then
+ names_map_add id_to_string is_opaque id name ctx.strict_names_map
+ else ctx.strict_names_map
+ in
let names_map =
names_map_add id_to_string is_opaque id name ctx.names_map
in
- { ctx with names_map }
+ { ctx with strict_names_map; names_map }
(** [with_opaque_pre]: if [true] and the definition is opaque, add the opaque prefix *)
let ctx_get (with_opaque_pre : bool) (id : id) (ctx : extraction_ctx) : string =
diff --git a/compiler/Translate.ml b/compiler/Translate.ml
index 90066163..ebb0de0e 100644
--- a/compiler/Translate.ml
+++ b/compiler/Translate.ml
@@ -986,6 +986,19 @@ let translate_crate (filename : string) (dest_dir : string) (crate : A.crate) :
mk_formatter_and_names_map trans_ctx crate.name
variant_concatenate_type_name
in
+ let strict_names_map =
+ let open ExtractBase in
+ let ids =
+ List.filter
+ (fun (id, _) -> strict_collisions id)
+ (IdMap.bindings names_map.id_to_name)
+ in
+ let is_opaque = false in
+ List.fold_left
+ (* id_to_string: we shouldn't need to use it *)
+ (fun m (id, n) -> names_map_add show_id is_opaque id n m)
+ empty_names_map ids
+ in
(* We need to compute which functions are recursive, in order to know
* whether we should generate a decrease clause or not. *)
@@ -1041,6 +1054,7 @@ let translate_crate (filename : string) (dest_dir : string) (crate : A.crate) :
trans_ctx;
names_map;
unsafe_names_map = { id_to_name = ExtractBase.IdMap.empty };
+ strict_names_map;
fmt;
indent_incr = 2;
use_opaque_pre = !Config.split_files;