summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/backends/lean/Base/Primitives/Scalar.lean
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSon HO2024-06-13 15:19:11 +0200
committerGitHub2024-06-13 15:19:11 +0200
commit234fa36da87b672397f96098bcf832d869f2cfbb (patch)
treeafb669e46c958fc516b8441278a006582d7f2400 /backends/lean/Base/Primitives/Scalar.lean
parent40e79f1fd64a6535334b1af19a817b27a9a0296c (diff)
parent87d088fa9e4493f32ae3f8d447ff1ff6d44e6396 (diff)
Merge pull request #242 from AeneasVerif/son/scalars2
Update the scalar notations for the Lean backend
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--backends/lean/Base/Primitives/Scalar.lean123
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 102 deletions
diff --git a/backends/lean/Base/Primitives/Scalar.lean b/backends/lean/Base/Primitives/Scalar.lean
index 157ade2c..f4264b9b 100644
--- a/backends/lean/Base/Primitives/Scalar.lean
+++ b/backends/lean/Base/Primitives/Scalar.lean
@@ -312,38 +312,13 @@ theorem Scalar.bound_suffices (ty : ScalarTy) (x : Int) :
λ h => by
apply And.intro <;> have hmin := Scalar.cMin_bound ty <;> have hmax := Scalar.cMax_bound ty <;> linarith
-/- [match_pattern] attribute: allows to us `Scalar.ofIntCore` inside of patterns.
- This is particularly useful once we introduce notations like `#u32` (which
- desugards to `Scalar.ofIntCore`) as it allows to write expressions like this:
- Example:
- ```
- match x with
- | 0#u32 => ...
- | 1#u32 => ...
- | ...
- ```
- -/
-@[match_pattern] def Scalar.ofIntCore {ty : ScalarTy} (x : Int)
+def Scalar.ofIntCore {ty : ScalarTy} (x : Int)
(h : Scalar.min ty ≤ x ∧ x ≤ Scalar.max ty) : Scalar ty :=
{ val := x, hmin := h.left, hmax := h.right }
--- The definitions below are used later to introduce nice syntax for constants,
--- like `1#u32`. We are reusing the technique described here: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/Different.20elaboration.20inside.2Foutside.20of.20match.20patterns/near/425455284
-
-class InBounds (ty : ScalarTy) (x : Int) :=
- hInBounds : Scalar.cMin ty ≤ x ∧ x ≤ Scalar.cMax ty
-
--- This trick to trigger reduction for decidable propositions comes from
--- here: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/instance.20with.20tactic.20autoparam/near/343495807
-class Decide (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : Prop where
- isTrue : p
-instance : @Decide p (.isTrue h) := @Decide.mk p (_) h
-
-instance [Decide (Scalar.cMin ty ≤ v ∧ v ≤ Scalar.cMax ty)] : InBounds ty v where
- hInBounds := Decide.isTrue
-
-@[reducible, match_pattern] def Scalar.ofInt {ty : ScalarTy} (x : Int) [InBounds ty x] : Scalar ty :=
- Scalar.ofIntCore x (Scalar.bound_suffices ty x InBounds.hInBounds)
+@[reducible] def Scalar.ofInt {ty : ScalarTy} (x : Int)
+ (hInBounds : Scalar.cMin ty ≤ x ∧ x ≤ Scalar.cMax ty := by decide) : Scalar ty :=
+ Scalar.ofIntCore x (Scalar.bound_suffices ty x hInBounds)
@[simp] abbrev Scalar.in_bounds (ty : ScalarTy) (x : Int) : Prop :=
Scalar.min ty ≤ x ∧ x ≤ Scalar.max ty
@@ -412,9 +387,8 @@ theorem Scalar.tryMk_eq (ty : ScalarTy) (x : Int) :
simp [tryMk, ofOption, tryMkOpt]
split_ifs <;> simp
-instance (ty: ScalarTy) : InBounds ty 0 where
- hInBounds := by
- induction ty <;> simp [Scalar.cMax, Scalar.cMin, Scalar.max, Scalar.min] <;> decide
+@[simp] theorem zero_in_cbounds {ty : ScalarTy} : Scalar.cMin ty ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ Scalar.cMax ty := by
+ cases ty <;> simp [Scalar.cMax, Scalar.cMin, Scalar.max, Scalar.min] <;> decide
def Scalar.neg {ty : ScalarTy} (x : Scalar ty) : Result (Scalar ty) := Scalar.tryMk ty (- x.val)
@@ -1268,73 +1242,18 @@ def U128.ofIntCore := @Scalar.ofIntCore .U128
-- ofInt
-- TODO: typeclass?
-@[match_pattern] abbrev Isize.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .Isize
-@[match_pattern] abbrev I8.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .I8
-@[match_pattern] abbrev I16.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .I16
-@[match_pattern] abbrev I32.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .I32
-@[match_pattern] abbrev I64.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .I64
-@[match_pattern] abbrev I128.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .I128
-@[match_pattern] abbrev Usize.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .Usize
-@[match_pattern] abbrev U8.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .U8
-@[match_pattern] abbrev U16.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .U16
-@[match_pattern] abbrev U32.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .U32
-@[match_pattern] abbrev U64.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .U64
-@[match_pattern] abbrev U128.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .U128
-
-postfix:max "#isize" => Isize.ofInt
-postfix:max "#i8" => I8.ofInt
-postfix:max "#i16" => I16.ofInt
-postfix:max "#i32" => I32.ofInt
-postfix:max "#i64" => I64.ofInt
-postfix:max "#i128" => I128.ofInt
-postfix:max "#usize" => Usize.ofInt
-postfix:max "#u8" => U8.ofInt
-postfix:max "#u16" => U16.ofInt
-postfix:max "#u32" => U32.ofInt
-postfix:max "#u64" => U64.ofInt
-postfix:max "#u128" => U128.ofInt
-
-/- Testing the notations -/
-example := 0#u32
-example := 1#u32
-example := 1#i32
-example := 0#isize
-example := (-1)#isize
-example (x : U32) : Bool :=
- match x with
- | 0#u32 => true
- | _ => false
-
-example (x : U32) : Bool :=
- match x with
- | 1#u32 => true
- | _ => false
-
-example (x : I32) : Bool :=
- match x with
- | (-1)#i32 => true
- | _ => false
-
--- Notation for pattern matching
--- We make the precedence looser than the negation.
-notation:70 a:70 "#scalar" => Scalar.mk (a) _ _
-
-example {ty} (x : Scalar ty) : ℤ :=
- match x with
- | v#scalar => v
-
-example {ty} (x : Scalar ty) : Bool :=
- match x with
- | 1#scalar => true
- | _ => false
-
-example {ty} (x : Scalar ty) : Bool :=
- match x with
- | -(1 : Int)#scalar => true
- | _ => false
-
--- Testing the notations
-example : Result Usize := 0#usize + 1#usize
+abbrev Isize.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .Isize
+abbrev I8.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .I8
+abbrev I16.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .I16
+abbrev I32.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .I32
+abbrev I64.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .I64
+abbrev I128.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .I128
+abbrev Usize.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .Usize
+abbrev U8.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .U8
+abbrev U16.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .U16
+abbrev U32.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .U32
+abbrev U64.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .U64
+abbrev U128.ofInt := @Scalar.ofInt .U128
-- TODO: factor those lemmas out
@[simp] theorem Scalar.ofInt_val_eq {ty} (h : Scalar.min ty ≤ x ∧ x ≤ Scalar.max ty) : (Scalar.ofIntCore x h).val = x := by
@@ -1464,18 +1383,18 @@ theorem coe_max {ty: ScalarTy} (a b: Scalar ty): ↑(Max.max a b) = (Max.max (â†
-- Max theory
-- TODO: do the min theory later on.
-theorem Scalar.zero_le_unsigned {ty} (s: ¬ ty.isSigned) (x: Scalar ty): Scalar.ofInt 0 ≤ x := by
+theorem Scalar.zero_le_unsigned {ty} (s: ¬ ty.isSigned) (x: Scalar ty): Scalar.ofInt 0 (by simp) ≤ x := by
apply (Scalar.le_equiv _ _).2
convert x.hmin
cases ty <;> simp [ScalarTy.isSigned] at s <;> simp [Scalar.min]
@[simp]
theorem Scalar.max_unsigned_left_zero_eq {ty} [s: Fact (¬ ty.isSigned)] (x: Scalar ty):
- Max.max (Scalar.ofInt 0) x = x := max_eq_right (Scalar.zero_le_unsigned s.out x)
+ Max.max (Scalar.ofInt 0 (by simp)) x = x := max_eq_right (Scalar.zero_le_unsigned s.out x)
@[simp]
theorem Scalar.max_unsigned_right_zero_eq {ty} [s: Fact (¬ ty.isSigned)] (x: Scalar ty):
- Max.max x (Scalar.ofInt 0) = x := max_eq_left (Scalar.zero_le_unsigned s.out x)
+ Max.max x (Scalar.ofInt 0 (by simp)) = x := max_eq_left (Scalar.zero_le_unsigned s.out x)
-- Leading zeros
def core.num.Usize.leading_zeros (x : Usize) : U32 := sorry