summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSon Ho2023-09-18 12:54:49 +0200
committerSon Ho2023-09-18 12:54:49 +0200
commit1986e028839a771271979e6fc30fe4152fe66e45 (patch)
treecc40fd5d0b7b9c0c9d5592a1b36a794dca8370c5
parent02b075a2f0be787860bf431e04b92cc450d9a888 (diff)
Make progress on the tutorial
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--tests/lean/Tutorial.lean69
1 files changed, 66 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/tests/lean/Tutorial.lean b/tests/lean/Tutorial.lean
index 2c37626e..0ba830a6 100644
--- a/tests/lean/Tutorial.lean
+++ b/tests/lean/Tutorial.lean
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ open Result
namespace Tutorial
-/- # Simple Arithmetic Example -/
+/- # Simple Arithmetic Example ################################################# -/
/- As a first step, we want to consider the function below which performs
simple arithmetic. There are several things to note.
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ theorem mul2_add1_spec
The ↑ notation (\u) is used to coerce values. Here, we coerce [x], which is
a bounded machine integer, to an unbounded mathematical integer. Note that
writing [↑ x] is the same as writing [x.val].
+
+ Remark: we advise always writing inequalities in the same direction (that is
+ ≤ and not ≥), because it helps the simplifier.
-/
(h : 2 * (↑ x) + 1 ≤ U32.max)
/- The postcondition -/
@@ -169,7 +172,7 @@ theorem use_mul2_add1_spec (x : U32) (y : U32) (h : 2 * (↑ x) + 1 + ↑ y ≤
progress as ⟨ z .. ⟩
simp at *; scalar_tac
-/- # Recursion -/
+/- # Recursion ################################################################ -/
/- We can have a look at more complex examples, for example recursive functions. -/
@@ -278,7 +281,7 @@ theorem list_nth_spec {T : Type} [Inhabited T] (l : CList T) (i : U32)
simp [hi]
-- i0 := i - 1
progress as ⟨ i1, hi1 ⟩
- -- Recursive call
+ -- [progress] can handle recursion
simp [CList.to_list] at h
progress as ⟨ l1 ⟩
-- Proving the postcondition
@@ -294,4 +297,64 @@ theorem list_nth_spec {T : Type} [Inhabited T] (l : CList T) (i : U32)
have : i.val ≠ 0 := by scalar_tac
simp [CList.to_list, *]
+/- # Partial functions ################################################# -/
+
+/- Recursive functions may not terminate on all inputs.
+
+ For instance, the function below only terminates on positive inputs (note
+ that we switched to signed integers), in which cases it behaves like the
+ identity. When we need to define such a potentially partial function,
+ we use the [divergent] keyword, which means that the function may diverge
+ (i.e., infinitely loop).
+
+ We will skip the details of how [divergent] precisely handles non-termination.
+ All you need to know is that the [Result] type has actually 3 cases (we saw
+ the first 2 cases in the examples above):
+ - ret: successful computation
+ - fail: failure (panic because of overflow, etc.)
+ - div: the computation doesn't terminate.
+
+ If in a theorem we state and prove that:
+ ```
+ ∃ y, i32_id x = ret x
+ ```
+ we not only prove that the function doesn't fail, but also that it terminates.
+ -/
+divergent def i32_id (x : I32) : Result I32 :=
+ if x = I32.ofInt 0 then ret (I32.ofInt 0)
+ else do
+ let x1 ← x - I32.ofInt 1
+ let x2 ← i32_id x1
+ x2 + (I32.ofInt 1)
+
+/- We can easily prove that [i32_id] behaves like the identity on positive inputs -/
+theorem i32_id_spec (x : I32) (h : 0 ≤ x.val) :
+ ∃ y, i32_id x = ret y ∧ x.val = y.val := by
+ rw [i32_id]
+ if hx : x = I32.ofInt 0 then
+ simp_all
+ else
+ simp [hx]
+ -- TODO: automatic lookup doesn't work?
+ -- x - 1
+ progress with Scalar.sub_spec as ⟨ x1 ⟩
+ -- Recursive call
+ progress as ⟨ x2 ⟩
+ -- x2 + 1
+ progress with Scalar.add_spec
+ -- Postcondition
+ simp; scalar_tac
+-- Below: we have to prove that the recursive call performed in the proof terminates.
+-- We first specify a decreasing value. Here, we state that [x], seen as a natural number,
+-- decreases at every recursive call.
+termination_by i32_id_spec x _ => x.val.toNat
+-- And we now have to prove that it indeed decreases - you can skip this for now.
+decreasing_by
+ -- We first need to "massage" the goal (in practice, all the proofs of [decreasing_by]
+ -- should start with a call to [simp_wf]).
+ simp_wf
+ -- Finish the proof
+ have : 1 ≤ x.val := by scalar_tac
+ simp [Int.toNat_sub_of_le, *]
+
end Tutorial