aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--.gitignore1
-rw-r--r--hott/Equivalence.thy23
-rw-r--r--hott/Identity.thy82
-rw-r--r--spartan/core/Spartan.thy2
-rw-r--r--spartan/core/elaborated_expression.ML402
-rw-r--r--spartan/core/elaboration.ML76
-rw-r--r--spartan/core/goals.ML125
-rw-r--r--spartan/core/lib.ML37
-rw-r--r--spartan/core/typechecking.ML57
9 files changed, 659 insertions, 146 deletions
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 82f42f5..de525c3 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
*~
+*.bak
\#*.thy#
\#*.ML#
diff --git a/hott/Equivalence.thy b/hott/Equivalence.thy
index d976677..d844b59 100644
--- a/hott/Equivalence.thy
+++ b/hott/Equivalence.thy
@@ -33,13 +33,16 @@ Lemma (derive) hsym:
"g: \<Prod>x: A. B x"
"A: U i"
"\<And>x. x: A \<Longrightarrow> B x: U i"
- shows "H: f ~ g \<Longrightarrow> g ~ f"
- unfolding homotopy_def
- apply intro
- apply (rule pathinv)
- \<guillemotright> by (elim H)
- \<guillemotright> by typechk
- done
+ "H: f ~ g"
+ shows "g ~ f"
+unfolding homotopy_def
+proof intro
+ fix x assume "x: A" then have "H x: f x = g x"
+ using \<open>H:_\<close>[unfolded homotopy_def]
+ \<comment> \<open>this should become unnecessary when definitional unfolding is implemented\<close>
+ by typechk
+ thus "g x = f x" by (rule pathinv) fact
+qed typechk
Lemma (derive) htrans:
assumes
@@ -71,9 +74,9 @@ Lemma (derive) commute_homotopy:
assumes
"A: U i" "B: U i"
"x: A" "y: A"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ "p: x = y"
"f: A \<rightarrow> B" "g: A \<rightarrow> B"
- "H: homotopy A (fn _. B) f g"
+ "H: f ~ g"
shows "(H x) \<bullet> g[p] = f[p] \<bullet> (H y)"
\<comment> \<open>Need this assumption unfolded for typechecking\<close>
supply assms(8)[unfolded homotopy_def]
@@ -94,7 +97,7 @@ Corollary (derive) commute_homotopy':
"A: U i"
"x: A"
"f: A \<rightarrow> A"
- "H: homotopy A (fn _. A) f (id A)"
+ "H: f ~ (id A)"
shows "H (f x) = f [H x]"
oops
diff --git a/hott/Identity.thy b/hott/Identity.thy
index 29ce26a..728537c 100644
--- a/hott/Identity.thy
+++ b/hott/Identity.thy
@@ -135,14 +135,14 @@ lemmas
section \<open>Basic propositional equalities\<close>
Lemma (derive) refl_pathcomp:
- assumes "A: U i" "x: A" "y: A" "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ assumes "A: U i" "x: A" "y: A" "p: x = y"
shows "(refl x) \<bullet> p = p"
apply (eq p)
apply (reduce; intro)
done
Lemma (derive) pathcomp_refl:
- assumes "A: U i" "x: A" "y: A" "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ assumes "A: U i" "x: A" "y: A" "p: x = y"
shows "p \<bullet> (refl y) = p"
apply (eq p)
apply (reduce; intro)
@@ -166,24 +166,24 @@ Lemma ru_refl [comp]:
unfolding pathcomp_refl_def by reduce
Lemma (derive) inv_pathcomp:
- assumes "A: U i" "x: A" "y: A" "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ assumes "A: U i" "x: A" "y: A" "p: x = y"
shows "p\<inverse> \<bullet> p = refl y"
by (eq p) (reduce; intro)
Lemma (derive) pathcomp_inv:
- assumes "A: U i" "x: A" "y: A" "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ assumes "A: U i" "x: A" "y: A" "p: x = y"
shows "p \<bullet> p\<inverse> = refl x"
by (eq p) (reduce; intro)
Lemma (derive) pathinv_pathinv:
- assumes "A: U i" "x: A" "y: A" "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ assumes "A: U i" "x: A" "y: A" "p: x = y"
shows "p\<inverse>\<inverse> = p"
by (eq p) (reduce; intro)
Lemma (derive) pathcomp_assoc:
assumes
"A: U i" "x: A" "y: A" "z: A" "w: A"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y" "q: y =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> z" "r: z =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> w"
+ "p: x = y" "q: y = z" "r: z = w"
shows "p \<bullet> (q \<bullet> r) = p \<bullet> q \<bullet> r"
apply (eq p)
focus prems vars x p
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ Lemma (derive) ap:
"A: U i" "B: U i"
"x: A" "y: A"
"f: A \<rightarrow> B"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ "p: x = y"
shows "f x = f y"
by (eq p) intro
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ Lemma (derive) ap_pathcomp:
"A: U i" "B: U i"
"x: A" "y: A" "z: A"
"f: A \<rightarrow> B"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y" "q: y =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> z"
+ "p: x = y" "q: y = z"
shows
"f[p \<bullet> q] = f[p] \<bullet> f[q]"
apply (eq p)
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ Lemma (derive) ap_pathinv:
"A: U i" "B: U i"
"x: A" "y: A"
"f: A \<rightarrow> B"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ "p: x = y"
shows "f[p\<inverse>] = f[p]\<inverse>"
by (eq p) (reduce; intro)
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ Lemma (derive) ap_funcomp:
"A: U i" "B: U i" "C: U i"
"x: A" "y: A"
"f: A \<rightarrow> B" "g: B \<rightarrow> C"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ "p: x = y"
shows "(g \<circ> f)[p] = g[f[p]]"
apply (eq p)
\<guillemotright> by reduce
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ Lemma (derive) ap_funcomp:
done
Lemma (derive) ap_id:
- assumes "A: U i" "x: A" "y: A" "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ assumes "A: U i" "x: A" "y: A" "p: x = y"
shows "(id A)[p] = p"
apply (eq p)
\<guillemotright> by reduce
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ Lemma (derive) transport:
"A: U i"
"\<And>x. x: A \<Longrightarrow> P x: U i"
"x: A" "y: A"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ "p: x = y"
shows "P x \<rightarrow> P y"
by (eq p) intro
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ Lemma (derive) transport_left_inv:
"A: U i"
"\<And>x. x: A \<Longrightarrow> P x: U i"
"x: A" "y: A"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ "p: x = y"
shows "(trans P p\<inverse>) \<circ> (trans P p) = id (P x)"
by (eq p) (reduce; refl)
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ Lemma (derive) transport_right_inv:
"A: U i"
"\<And>x. x: A \<Longrightarrow> P x: U i"
"x: A" "y: A"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ "p: x = y"
shows "(trans P p) \<circ> (trans P p\<inverse>) = id (P y)"
by (eq p) (reduce; intro)
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ Lemma (derive) transport_pathcomp:
"\<And>x. x: A \<Longrightarrow> P x: U i"
"x: A" "y: A" "z: A"
"u: P x"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y" "q: y =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> z"
+ "p: x = y" "q: y = z"
shows "trans P q (trans P p u) = trans P (p \<bullet> q) u"
apply (eq p)
focus prems vars x p
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ Lemma (derive) transport_compose_typefam:
"\<And>x. x: B \<Longrightarrow> P x: U i"
"f: A \<rightarrow> B"
"x: A" "y: A"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ "p: x = y"
"u: P (f x)"
shows "trans (fn x. P (f x)) p u = trans P f[p] u"
by (eq p) (reduce; intro)
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ Lemma (derive) transport_function_family:
"f: \<Prod>x: A. P x \<rightarrow> Q x"
"x: A" "y: A"
"u: P x"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ "p: x = y"
shows "trans Q p ((f x) u) = (f y) (trans P p u)"
by (eq p) (reduce; intro)
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ Lemma (derive) transport_const:
assumes
"A: U i" "B: U i"
"x: A" "y: A"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ "p: x = y"
shows "\<Prod>b: B. trans (fn _. B) p b = b"
by (intro, eq p) (reduce; intro)
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ Lemma (derive) pathlift:
"A: U i"
"\<And>x. x: A \<Longrightarrow> P x: U i"
"x: A" "y: A"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ "p: x = y"
"u: P x"
shows "<x, u> = <y, trans P p u>"
by (eq p) (reduce; intro)
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ Lemma (derive) pathlift_fst:
"\<And>x. x: A \<Longrightarrow> P x: U i"
"x: A" "y: A"
"u: P x"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ "p: x = y"
shows "fst[lift P p u] = p"
apply (eq p)
\<guillemotright> by reduce
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ Lemma (derive) apd:
"\<And>x. x: A \<Longrightarrow> P x: U i"
"f: \<Prod>x: A. P x"
"x: A" "y: A"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ "p: x = y"
shows "trans P p (f x) = f y"
by (eq p) (reduce; intro)
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ Lemma (derive) apd_ap:
"A: U i" "B: U i"
"f: A \<rightarrow> B"
"x: A" "y: A"
- "p: x =\<^bsub>A\<^esub> y"
+ "p: x = y"
shows "apd f p = trans_const B p (f x) \<bullet> f[p]"
by (eq p) (reduce; intro)
@@ -457,10 +457,9 @@ section \<open>Whiskering\<close>
Lemma (derive) right_whisker:
assumes "A: U i" "a: A" "b: A" "c: A"
- shows "\<lbrakk>p: a = b; q: a = b; r: b = c; \<alpha>: p =\<^bsub>a = b\<^esub> q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> p \<bullet> r = q \<bullet> r"
- \<comment> \<open>TODO: In the above we need to annotate the type of \<alpha> with the type `a = b`
- in order for the `eq` method to work correctly. This should be fixed with a
- pre-proof elaborator.\<close>
+ and "p: a = b" "q: a = b" "r: b = c"
+ and "\<alpha>: p = q"
+ shows "p \<bullet> r = q \<bullet> r"
apply (eq r)
focus prems vars x s t
proof -
@@ -473,7 +472,9 @@ Lemma (derive) right_whisker:
Lemma (derive) left_whisker:
assumes "A: U i" "a: A" "b: A" "c: A"
- shows "\<lbrakk>p: b = c; q: b = c; r: a = b; \<alpha>: p =\<^bsub>b = c\<^esub> q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> r \<bullet> p = r \<bullet> q"
+ and "p: b = c" "q: b = c" "r: a = b"
+ and "\<alpha>: p = q"
+ shows "r \<bullet> p = r \<bullet> q"
apply (eq r)
focus prems prms vars x s t
proof -
@@ -495,15 +496,13 @@ translations
"r \<bullet>\<^sub>l\<^bsub>c\<^esub> \<alpha>" \<leftharpoondown> "CONST left_whisker A a b c p q r \<alpha>"
Lemma whisker_refl [comp]:
- assumes "A: U i" "a: A" "b: A"
- shows "\<lbrakk>p: a = b; q: a = b; \<alpha>: p =\<^bsub>a = b\<^esub> q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
- \<alpha> \<bullet>\<^sub>r\<^bsub>a\<^esub> (refl b) \<equiv> ru p \<bullet> \<alpha> \<bullet> (ru q)\<inverse>"
+ assumes "A: U i" "a: A" "b: A" "p: a = b" "q: a = b" "\<alpha>: p = q"
+ shows "\<alpha> \<bullet>\<^sub>r\<^bsub>a\<^esub> (refl b) \<equiv> ru p \<bullet> \<alpha> \<bullet> (ru q)\<inverse>"
unfolding right_whisker_def by reduce
Lemma refl_whisker [comp]:
- assumes "A: U i" "a: A" "b: A"
- shows "\<lbrakk>p: a = b; q: a = b; \<alpha>: p = q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
- (refl a) \<bullet>\<^sub>l\<^bsub>b\<^esub> \<alpha> \<equiv> (lu p) \<bullet> \<alpha> \<bullet> (lu q)\<inverse>"
+ assumes "A: U i" "a: A" "b: A" "p: a = b" "q: a = b" "\<alpha>: p = q"
+ shows "(refl a) \<bullet>\<^sub>l\<^bsub>b\<^esub> \<alpha> \<equiv> (lu p) \<bullet> \<alpha> \<bullet> (lu q)\<inverse>"
unfolding left_whisker_def by reduce
method left_whisker = (rule left_whisker)
@@ -524,20 +523,22 @@ begin
Lemma (derive) horiz_pathcomp:
notes assums
- shows "\<lbrakk>\<alpha>: p = q; \<beta>: r = s\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> ?prf \<alpha> \<beta>: p \<bullet> r = q \<bullet> s"
+ assumes "\<alpha>: p = q" "\<beta>: r = s"
+ shows "p \<bullet> r = q \<bullet> s"
proof (rule pathcomp)
- show "\<alpha>: p = q \<Longrightarrow> p \<bullet> r = q \<bullet> r" by right_whisker
- show "\<beta>: r = s \<Longrightarrow> .. = q \<bullet> s" by left_whisker
+ show "p \<bullet> r = q \<bullet> r" by right_whisker fact
+ show ".. = q \<bullet> s" by left_whisker fact
qed typechk
text \<open>A second horizontal composition:\<close>
Lemma (derive) horiz_pathcomp':
notes assums
- shows "\<lbrakk>\<alpha>: p = q; \<beta>: r = s\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> ?prf \<alpha> \<beta>: p \<bullet> r = q \<bullet> s"
+ assumes "\<alpha>: p = q" "\<beta>: r = s"
+ shows "p \<bullet> r = q \<bullet> s"
proof (rule pathcomp)
- show "\<beta>: r = s \<Longrightarrow> p \<bullet> r = p \<bullet> s" by left_whisker
- show "\<alpha>: p = q \<Longrightarrow> .. = q \<bullet> s" by right_whisker
+ show "p \<bullet> r = p \<bullet> s" by left_whisker fact
+ show ".. = q \<bullet> s" by right_whisker fact
qed typechk
notation horiz_pathcomp (infix "\<star>" 121)
@@ -545,7 +546,8 @@ notation horiz_pathcomp' (infix "\<star>''" 121)
Lemma (derive) horiz_pathcomp_eq_horiz_pathcomp':
notes assums
- shows "\<lbrakk>\<alpha>: p = q; \<beta>: r = s\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<alpha> \<star> \<beta> = \<alpha> \<star>' \<beta>"
+ assumes "\<alpha>: p = q" "\<beta>: r = s"
+ shows "\<alpha> \<star> \<beta> = \<alpha> \<star>' \<beta>"
unfolding horiz_pathcomp_def horiz_pathcomp'_def
apply (eq \<alpha>, eq \<beta>)
focus vars p apply (eq p)
diff --git a/spartan/core/Spartan.thy b/spartan/core/Spartan.thy
index 2c7216e..11bdc2b 100644
--- a/spartan/core/Spartan.thy
+++ b/spartan/core/Spartan.thy
@@ -215,6 +215,8 @@ method_setup known =
subsection \<open>Statement commands\<close>
ML_file \<open>focus.ML\<close>
+ML_file \<open>elaboration.ML\<close>
+ML_file \<open>elaborated_expression.ML\<close>
ML_file \<open>goals.ML\<close>
subsection \<open>Proof methods\<close>
diff --git a/spartan/core/elaborated_expression.ML b/spartan/core/elaborated_expression.ML
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..49b7758
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spartan/core/elaborated_expression.ML
@@ -0,0 +1,402 @@
+(* Title: elaborated_expression.ML
+ Author: Joshua Chen
+
+A modification of parts of ~~/Pure/Isar/expression.ML to incorporate elaboration
+into the assumptions mechanism.
+
+Most of this file is copied verbatim from the original; the only changes are the
+addition of `elaborate` and a modification to `activate_i`.
+*)
+
+structure Elaborated_Expression = struct
+
+local
+
+open Element
+
+fun mk_type T = (Logic.mk_type T, [])
+fun mk_term t = (t, [])
+fun mk_propp (p, pats) = (Type.constraint propT p, pats)
+
+fun dest_type (T, []) = Logic.dest_type T
+fun dest_term (t, []) = t
+fun dest_propp (p, pats) = (p, pats)
+
+fun extract_inst (_, (_, ts)) = map mk_term ts
+fun restore_inst ((l, (p, _)), cs) = (l, (p, map dest_term cs))
+
+fun extract_eqns es = map (mk_term o snd) es
+fun restore_eqns (es, cs) = map2 (fn (b, _) => fn c => (b, dest_term c)) es cs
+
+fun extract_elem (Fixes fixes) = map (#2 #> the_list #> map mk_type) fixes
+ | extract_elem (Constrains csts) = map (#2 #> single #> map mk_type) csts
+ | extract_elem (Assumes asms) = map (#2 #> map mk_propp) asms
+ | extract_elem (Defines defs) = map (fn (_, (t, ps)) => [mk_propp (t, ps)]) defs
+ | extract_elem (Notes _) = []
+ | extract_elem (Lazy_Notes _) = []
+
+fun restore_elem (Fixes fixes, css) =
+ (fixes ~~ css) |> map (fn ((x, _, mx), cs) =>
+ (x, cs |> map dest_type |> try hd, mx)) |> Fixes
+ | restore_elem (Constrains csts, css) =
+ (csts ~~ css) |> map (fn ((x, _), cs) =>
+ (x, cs |> map dest_type |> hd)) |> Constrains
+ | restore_elem (Assumes asms, css) =
+ (asms ~~ css) |> map (fn ((b, _), cs) => (b, map dest_propp cs)) |> Assumes
+ | restore_elem (Defines defs, css) =
+ (defs ~~ css) |> map (fn ((b, _), [c]) => (b, dest_propp c)) |> Defines
+ | restore_elem (elem as Notes _, _) = elem
+ | restore_elem (elem as Lazy_Notes _, _) = elem
+
+fun prep (_, pats) (ctxt, t :: ts) =
+ let val ctxt' = Proof_Context.augment t ctxt
+ in
+ ((t, Syntax.check_props
+ (Proof_Context.set_mode Proof_Context.mode_pattern ctxt') pats),
+ (ctxt', ts))
+ end
+
+fun check cs ctxt =
+ let
+ val (cs', (ctxt', _)) = fold_map prep cs
+ (ctxt, Syntax.check_terms
+ (Proof_Context.set_mode Proof_Context.mode_schematic ctxt) (map fst cs))
+ in (cs', ctxt') end
+
+fun inst_morphism params ((prfx, mandatory), insts') ctxt =
+ let
+ (* parameters *)
+ val parm_types = map #2 params;
+ val type_parms = fold Term.add_tfreesT parm_types [];
+
+ (* type inference *)
+ val parm_types' = map (Type_Infer.paramify_vars o Logic.varifyT_global) parm_types;
+ val type_parms' = fold Term.add_tvarsT parm_types' [];
+ val checked =
+ (map (Logic.mk_type o TVar) type_parms' @ map2 Type.constraint parm_types' insts')
+ |> Syntax.check_terms (Config.put Type_Infer.object_logic false ctxt)
+ val (type_parms'', insts'') = chop (length type_parms') checked;
+
+ (* context *)
+ val ctxt' = fold Proof_Context.augment checked ctxt;
+ val certT = Thm.trim_context_ctyp o Thm.ctyp_of ctxt';
+ val cert = Thm.trim_context_cterm o Thm.cterm_of ctxt';
+
+ (* instantiation *)
+ val instT =
+ (type_parms ~~ map Logic.dest_type type_parms'')
+ |> map_filter (fn (v, T) => if TFree v = T then NONE else SOME (v, T));
+ val cert_inst =
+ ((map #1 params ~~ map (Term_Subst.instantiateT_frees instT) parm_types) ~~ insts'')
+ |> map_filter (fn (v, t) => if Free v = t then NONE else SOME (v, cert t));
+ in
+ (Element.instantiate_normalize_morphism (map (apsnd certT) instT, cert_inst) $>
+ Morphism.binding_morphism "Expression.inst" (Binding.prefix mandatory prfx), ctxt')
+ end;
+
+fun abs_def ctxt =
+ Thm.cterm_of ctxt #> Assumption.assume ctxt #> Local_Defs.abs_def_rule ctxt #> Thm.prop_of;
+
+fun declare_elem prep_var (Element.Fixes fixes) ctxt =
+ let val (vars, _) = fold_map prep_var fixes ctxt
+ in ctxt |> Proof_Context.add_fixes vars |> snd end
+ | declare_elem prep_var (Element.Constrains csts) ctxt =
+ ctxt |> fold_map (fn (x, T) => prep_var (Binding.name x, SOME T, NoSyn)) csts |> snd
+ | declare_elem _ (Element.Assumes _) ctxt = ctxt
+ | declare_elem _ (Element.Defines _) ctxt = ctxt
+ | declare_elem _ (Element.Notes _) ctxt = ctxt
+ | declare_elem _ (Element.Lazy_Notes _) ctxt = ctxt;
+
+fun parameters_of thy strict (expr, fixed) =
+ let
+ val ctxt = Proof_Context.init_global thy;
+
+ fun reject_dups message xs =
+ (case duplicates (op =) xs of
+ [] => ()
+ | dups => error (message ^ commas dups));
+
+ fun parm_eq ((p1, mx1), (p2, mx2)) =
+ p1 = p2 andalso
+ (Mixfix.equal (mx1, mx2) orelse
+ error ("Conflicting syntax for parameter " ^ quote p1 ^ " in expression" ^
+ Position.here_list [Mixfix.pos_of mx1, Mixfix.pos_of mx2]));
+
+ fun params_loc loc = Locale.params_of thy loc |> map (apfst #1);
+ fun params_inst (loc, (prfx, (Expression.Positional insts, eqns))) =
+ let
+ val ps = params_loc loc;
+ val d = length ps - length insts;
+ val insts' =
+ if d < 0 then
+ error ("More arguments than parameters in instantiation of locale " ^
+ quote (Locale.markup_name ctxt loc))
+ else insts @ replicate d NONE;
+ val ps' = (ps ~~ insts') |>
+ map_filter (fn (p, NONE) => SOME p | (_, SOME _) => NONE);
+ in (ps', (loc, (prfx, (Expression.Positional insts', eqns)))) end
+ | params_inst (loc, (prfx, (Expression.Named insts, eqns))) =
+ let
+ val _ =
+ reject_dups "Duplicate instantiation of the following parameter(s): "
+ (map fst insts);
+ val ps' = (insts, params_loc loc) |-> fold (fn (p, _) => fn ps =>
+ if AList.defined (op =) ps p then AList.delete (op =) p ps
+ else error (quote p ^ " not a parameter of instantiated expression"));
+ in (ps', (loc, (prfx, (Expression.Named insts, eqns)))) end;
+ fun params_expr is =
+ let
+ val (is', ps') = fold_map (fn i => fn ps =>
+ let
+ val (ps', i') = params_inst i;
+ val ps'' = distinct parm_eq (ps @ ps');
+ in (i', ps'') end) is []
+ in (ps', is') end;
+
+ val (implicit, expr') = params_expr expr;
+
+ val implicit' = map #1 implicit;
+ val fixed' = map (Variable.check_name o #1) fixed;
+ val _ = reject_dups "Duplicate fixed parameter(s): " fixed';
+ val implicit'' =
+ if strict then []
+ else
+ let
+ val _ =
+ reject_dups
+ "Parameter(s) declared simultaneously in expression and for clause: "
+ (implicit' @ fixed');
+ in map (fn (x, mx) => (Binding.name x, NONE, mx)) implicit end;
+ in (expr', implicit'' @ fixed) end;
+
+fun parse_elem prep_typ prep_term ctxt =
+ Element.map_ctxt
+ {binding = I,
+ typ = prep_typ ctxt,
+ term = prep_term (Proof_Context.set_mode Proof_Context.mode_schematic ctxt),
+ pattern = prep_term (Proof_Context.set_mode Proof_Context.mode_pattern ctxt),
+ fact = I,
+ attrib = I};
+
+fun prepare_stmt prep_prop prep_obtains ctxt stmt =
+ (case stmt of
+ Element.Shows raw_shows =>
+ raw_shows |> (map o apsnd o map) (fn (t, ps) =>
+ (prep_prop (Proof_Context.set_mode Proof_Context.mode_schematic ctxt) t,
+ map (prep_prop (Proof_Context.set_mode Proof_Context.mode_pattern ctxt)) ps))
+ | Element.Obtains raw_obtains =>
+ let
+ val ((_, thesis), thesis_ctxt) = Obtain.obtain_thesis ctxt;
+ val obtains = prep_obtains thesis_ctxt thesis raw_obtains;
+ in map (fn (b, t) => ((b, []), [(t, [])])) obtains end);
+
+fun finish_fixes (parms: (string * typ) list) = map (fn (binding, _, mx) =>
+ let val x = Binding.name_of binding
+ in (binding, AList.lookup (op =) parms x, mx) end)
+
+fun finish_inst ctxt (loc, (prfx, inst)) =
+ let
+ val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt;
+ val (morph, _) = inst_morphism (map #1 (Locale.params_of thy loc)) (prfx, inst) ctxt;
+ in (loc, morph) end
+
+fun closeup _ _ false elem = elem
+ | closeup (outer_ctxt, ctxt) parms true elem =
+ let
+ (* FIXME consider closing in syntactic phase -- before type checking *)
+ fun close_frees t =
+ let
+ val rev_frees =
+ Term.fold_aterms (fn Free (x, T) =>
+ if Variable.is_fixed outer_ctxt x orelse AList.defined (op =) parms x then I
+ else insert (op =) (x, T) | _ => I) t [];
+ in fold (Logic.all o Free) rev_frees t end;
+
+ fun no_binds [] = []
+ | no_binds _ = error "Illegal term bindings in context element";
+ in
+ (case elem of
+ Assumes asms => Assumes (asms |> map (fn (a, propps) =>
+ (a, map (fn (t, ps) => (close_frees t, no_binds ps)) propps)))
+ | Defines defs => Defines (defs |> map (fn ((name, atts), (t, ps)) =>
+ let val ((c, _), t') = Local_Defs.cert_def ctxt (K []) (close_frees t)
+ in ((Thm.def_binding_optional (Binding.name c) name, atts), (t', no_binds ps)) end))
+ | e => e)
+ end
+
+fun finish_elem _ parms _ (Fixes fixes) = Fixes (finish_fixes parms fixes)
+ | finish_elem _ _ _ (Constrains _) = Constrains []
+ | finish_elem ctxts parms do_close (Assumes asms) = closeup ctxts parms do_close (Assumes asms)
+ | finish_elem ctxts parms do_close (Defines defs) = closeup ctxts parms do_close (Defines defs)
+ | finish_elem _ _ _ (elem as Notes _) = elem
+ | finish_elem _ _ _ (elem as Lazy_Notes _) = elem
+
+fun check_autofix insts eqnss elems concl ctxt =
+ let
+ val inst_cs = map extract_inst insts;
+ val eqns_cs = map extract_eqns eqnss;
+ val elem_css = map extract_elem elems;
+ val concl_cs = (map o map) mk_propp (map snd concl);
+ (* Type inference *)
+ val (inst_cs' :: eqns_cs' :: css', ctxt') =
+ (fold_burrow o fold_burrow) check (inst_cs :: eqns_cs :: elem_css @ [concl_cs]) ctxt;
+ val (elem_css', [concl_cs']) = chop (length elem_css) css';
+ in
+ ((map restore_inst (insts ~~ inst_cs'),
+ map restore_eqns (eqnss ~~ eqns_cs'),
+ map restore_elem (elems ~~ elem_css'),
+ map fst concl ~~ concl_cs'), ctxt')
+ end
+
+fun prep_full_context_statement
+ parse_typ parse_prop
+ prep_obtains prep_var_elem prep_inst prep_eqns prep_attr prep_var_inst prep_expr
+ {strict, do_close, fixed_frees} raw_import init_body raw_elems raw_stmt
+ ctxt1
+ =
+ let
+ val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt1
+ val (raw_insts, fixed) = parameters_of thy strict (apfst (prep_expr thy) raw_import)
+ fun prep_insts_cumulative (loc, (prfx, (inst, eqns))) (i, insts, eqnss, ctxt) =
+ let
+ val params = map #1 (Locale.params_of thy loc)
+ val inst' = prep_inst ctxt (map #1 params) inst
+ val parm_types' =
+ params |> map (#2 #> Logic.varifyT_global #>
+ Term.map_type_tvar (fn ((x, _), S) => TVar ((x, i), S)) #>
+ Type_Infer.paramify_vars)
+ val inst'' = map2 Type.constraint parm_types' inst'
+ val insts' = insts @ [(loc, (prfx, inst''))]
+ val ((insts'', _, _, _), ctxt2) = check_autofix insts' [] [] [] ctxt
+ val inst''' = insts'' |> List.last |> snd |> snd
+ val (inst_morph, _) = inst_morphism params (prfx, inst''') ctxt
+ val ctxt' = Locale.activate_declarations (loc, inst_morph) ctxt2
+ handle ERROR msg => if null eqns then error msg else
+ (Locale.tracing ctxt1
+ (msg ^ "\nFalling back to reading rewrites clause before activation.");
+ ctxt2)
+ val attrss = map (apsnd (map (prep_attr ctxt)) o fst) eqns
+ val eqns' = (prep_eqns ctxt' o map snd) eqns
+ val eqnss' = [attrss ~~ eqns']
+ val ((_, [eqns''], _, _), _) = check_autofix insts'' eqnss' [] [] ctxt'
+ val rewrite_morph = eqns'
+ |> map (abs_def ctxt')
+ |> Variable.export_terms ctxt' ctxt
+ |> Element.eq_term_morphism (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt)
+ |> the_default Morphism.identity
+ val ctxt'' = Locale.activate_declarations (loc, inst_morph $> rewrite_morph) ctxt
+ val eqnss' = eqnss @ [attrss ~~ Variable.export_terms ctxt' ctxt eqns']
+ in (i + 1, insts', eqnss', ctxt'') end
+
+ fun prep_elem raw_elem ctxt =
+ let
+ val ctxt' = ctxt
+ |> Context_Position.set_visible false
+ |> declare_elem prep_var_elem raw_elem
+ |> Context_Position.restore_visible ctxt
+ val elems' = parse_elem parse_typ parse_prop ctxt' raw_elem
+ in (elems', ctxt') end
+
+ val fors = fold_map prep_var_inst fixed ctxt1 |> fst
+ val ctxt2 = ctxt1 |> Proof_Context.add_fixes fors |> snd
+ val (_, insts', eqnss', ctxt3) = fold prep_insts_cumulative raw_insts (0, [], [], ctxt2)
+
+ fun prep_stmt elems ctxt =
+ check_autofix insts' [] elems (prepare_stmt parse_prop prep_obtains ctxt raw_stmt) ctxt
+
+ val _ =
+ if fixed_frees then ()
+ else
+ (case fold (fold (Variable.add_frees ctxt3) o snd o snd) insts' [] of
+ [] => ()
+ | frees => error ("Illegal free variables in expression: " ^
+ commas_quote (map (Syntax.string_of_term ctxt3 o Free) (rev frees))))
+
+ val ((insts, _, elems', concl), ctxt4) = ctxt3
+ |> init_body
+ |> fold_map prep_elem raw_elems
+ |-> prep_stmt
+
+ (* parameters from expression and elements *)
+ val xs = maps (fn Element.Fixes fixes => map (Variable.check_name o #1) fixes | _ => [])
+ (Element.Fixes fors :: elems')
+ val (parms, ctxt5) = fold_map Proof_Context.inferred_param xs ctxt4
+ val fors' = finish_fixes parms fors
+ val fixed = map (fn (b, SOME T, mx) => ((Binding.name_of b, T), mx)) fors'
+ val deps = map (finish_inst ctxt5) insts
+ val elems'' = map (finish_elem (ctxt1, ctxt5) parms do_close) elems'
+ in ((fixed, deps, eqnss', elems'', concl), (parms, ctxt5)) end
+
+fun prep_inst prep_term ctxt parms (Expression.Positional insts) =
+ (insts ~~ parms) |> map
+ (fn (NONE, p) => Free (p, dummyT)
+ | (SOME t, _) => prep_term ctxt t)
+ | prep_inst prep_term ctxt parms (Expression.Named insts) =
+ parms |> map (fn p =>
+ (case AList.lookup (op =) insts p of
+ SOME t => prep_term ctxt t |
+ NONE => Free (p, dummyT)))
+fun parse_inst x = prep_inst Syntax.parse_term x
+fun check_expr thy instances = map (apfst (Locale.check thy)) instances
+
+val read_full_context_statement = prep_full_context_statement
+ Syntax.parse_typ Syntax.parse_prop Obtain.parse_obtains
+ Proof_Context.read_var parse_inst Syntax.read_props Attrib.check_src
+ Proof_Context.read_var check_expr
+
+in
+
+fun prep_statement prep activate raw_elems raw_stmt ctxt =
+ let
+ val ((_, _, _, elems, concl), _) =
+ prep {strict = true, do_close = false, fixed_frees = true}
+ ([], []) I raw_elems raw_stmt ctxt;
+ val ctxt' = ctxt
+ |> Proof_Context.set_stmt true
+ |> fold_map activate elems |> #2
+ |> Proof_Context.restore_stmt ctxt;
+ in (concl, ctxt') end
+
+fun elaborate ctxt assms =
+ let
+ fun subst_term env = Envir.subst_term (Envir.type_env env, Envir.term_env env)
+ fun elab_fact (fact, xs) assums =
+ let val (subst, fact') = Elab.elab_stmt ctxt assums fact in
+ ((fact', map (subst_term subst) xs), Thm.cterm_of ctxt fact' :: assums)
+ end
+ fun elab (b, facts) assums =
+ let val (facts', assums') = fold_map elab_fact facts assums
+ in ((b, facts'), assums') end
+ in
+ #1 (fold_map elab assms [])
+ end
+
+fun activate_i elem ctxt =
+ let
+ val elem' =
+ (case (map_ctxt_attrib o map) Token.init_assignable elem of
+ Defines defs =>
+ Defines (defs |> map (fn ((a, atts), (t, ps)) =>
+ ((Thm.def_binding_optional
+ (Binding.name (#1 (#1 (Local_Defs.cert_def ctxt (K []) t)))) a, atts),
+ (t, ps))))
+ | Assumes assms => Assumes (elaborate ctxt assms)
+ | e => e);
+ val ctxt' = Context.proof_map (init elem') ctxt;
+ in ((map_ctxt_attrib o map) Token.closure elem', ctxt') end
+
+fun activate raw_elem ctxt =
+ let val elem = raw_elem |> map_ctxt
+ {binding = I,
+ typ = I,
+ term = I,
+ pattern = I,
+ fact = Proof_Context.get_fact ctxt,
+ attrib = Attrib.check_src ctxt}
+ in activate_i elem ctxt end;
+
+fun read_statement x = prep_statement read_full_context_statement activate x
+
+end
+
+end \ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/spartan/core/elaboration.ML b/spartan/core/elaboration.ML
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..27b6bb0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spartan/core/elaboration.ML
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+(* Title: elaboration.ML
+ Author: Joshua Chen
+
+Basic elaboration.
+*)
+
+structure Elab: sig
+
+val elab: Proof.context -> cterm list -> term -> Envir.env
+val elab_stmt: Proof.context -> cterm list -> term -> Envir.env * term
+
+end = struct
+
+(*Elaborate `tm` by solving the inference problem `tm: {}`, knowing `assums`,
+ which are fully elaborated, in `ctxt`. Return a substitution.*)
+fun elab ctxt assums tm =
+ if Lib.no_vars tm
+ then Envir.init
+ else
+ let
+ val inf = Goal.init (Thm.cterm_of ctxt (Lib.typing_of_term tm))
+ val res = Types.check_infer (map Thm.assume assums) 1 (ctxt, inf)
+ val tm' =
+ Thm.prop_of (#2 (Seq.hd (Seq.filter_results res)))
+ |> Lib.dest_prop |> Lib.term_of_typing
+ handle TERM ("dest_typing", [t]) =>
+ let val typ = Logic.unprotect (Logic.strip_assums_concl t)
+ |> Lib.term_of_typing
+ in
+ error ("Elaboration of " ^ Syntax.string_of_term ctxt typ ^ " failed")
+ end
+ in
+ Seq.hd (Unify.matchers (Context.Proof ctxt) [(tm, tm')])
+ end
+ handle Option => error
+ ("Elaboration of " ^ Syntax.string_of_term ctxt tm ^ " failed")
+
+(*Recursively elaborate a statement \<And>x ... y. \<lbrakk>...\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P x ... y by elaborating
+ only the types of typing judgments (in particular, does not look at judgmental
+ equality statements). Could also elaborate the terms of typing judgments, but
+ for now we assume that these are always free variables in all the cases we're
+ interested in.*)
+fun elab_stmt ctxt assums stmt =
+ let
+ val stmt = Lib.dest_prop stmt
+ fun subst_term env = Envir.subst_term (Envir.type_env env, Envir.term_env env)
+ in
+ if Lib.no_vars stmt orelse Lib.is_eq stmt then
+ (Envir.init, stmt)
+ else if Lib.is_typing stmt then
+ let
+ val typ = Lib.type_of_typing stmt
+ val subst = elab ctxt assums typ
+ in (subst, subst_term subst stmt) end
+ else
+ let
+ fun elab' assums (x :: xs) =
+ let
+ val (env, x') = elab_stmt ctxt assums x
+ val assums' =
+ if Lib.no_vars x' then Thm.cterm_of ctxt x' :: assums else assums
+ in env :: elab' assums' xs end
+ | elab' _ [] = []
+ val (prems, concl) = Lib.decompose_goal ctxt stmt
+ val subst = fold (curry Envir.merge) (elab' assums prems) Envir.init
+ val prems' = map (Thm.cterm_of ctxt o subst_term subst) prems
+ val subst' =
+ if Lib.is_typing concl then
+ let val typ = Lib.type_of_typing concl
+ in Envir.merge (subst, elab ctxt (assums @ prems') typ) end
+ else subst
+ in (subst', subst_term subst' stmt) end
+ end
+
+
+end
diff --git a/spartan/core/goals.ML b/spartan/core/goals.ML
index 4b53a7f..3e2bd09 100644
--- a/spartan/core/goals.ML
+++ b/spartan/core/goals.ML
@@ -15,27 +15,27 @@ val long_keyword =
val long_statement =
Scan.optional
(Parse_Spec.opt_thm_name ":" --| Scan.ahead long_keyword)
- Binding.empty_atts --
- Scan.optional Parse_Spec.includes [] -- Parse_Spec.long_statement
- >> (fn ((binding, includes), (elems, concl)) =>
- (true, binding, includes, elems, concl))
+ Binding.empty_atts
+ -- Scan.optional Parse_Spec.includes []
+ -- Parse_Spec.long_statement >>
+ (fn ((binding, includes), (elems, concl)) =>
+ (true, binding, includes, elems, concl))
val short_statement =
- Parse_Spec.statement -- Parse_Spec.if_statement -- Parse.for_fixes
- >> (fn ((shows, assumes), fixes) =>
+ Parse_Spec.statement -- Parse_Spec.if_statement -- Parse.for_fixes >>
+ (fn ((shows, assumes), fixes) =>
(false, Binding.empty_atts, [],
- [Element.Fixes fixes, Element.Assumes assumes],
- Element.Shows shows))
+ [Element.Fixes fixes, Element.Assumes assumes], Element.Shows shows)
+ )
fun prep_statement prep_att prep_stmt raw_elems raw_stmt ctxt =
let
val (stmt, elems_ctxt) = prep_stmt raw_elems raw_stmt ctxt
val prems = Assumption.local_prems_of elems_ctxt ctxt
- val stmt_ctxt = fold (fold (Proof_Context.augment o fst) o snd)
- stmt elems_ctxt
- in
- case raw_stmt of
- Element.Shows _ =>
+ val stmt_ctxt =
+ fold (fold (Proof_Context.augment o fst) o snd) stmt elems_ctxt
+ in case raw_stmt
+ of Element.Shows _ =>
let val stmt' = Attrib.map_specs (map prep_att) stmt
in (([], prems, stmt', NONE), stmt_ctxt) end
| Element.Obtains raw_obtains =>
@@ -50,11 +50,8 @@ fun prep_statement prep_att prep_stmt raw_elems raw_stmt ctxt =
|> Proof_Context.note_thmss ""
[((Binding.name Auto_Bind.thatN, []), [(that, [])])]
||> Proof_Context.restore_stmt asms_ctxt
-
- val stmt' = [
- (Binding.empty_atts,
- [(#2 (#1 (Obtain.obtain_thesis ctxt)), [])])
- ]
+ val stmt' =
+ [(Binding.empty_atts, [(#2 (#1 (Obtain.obtain_thesis ctxt)), [])])]
in
((Obtain.obtains_attribs raw_obtains, prems, stmt', SOME that'),
that_ctxt)
@@ -65,23 +62,19 @@ fun define_proof_term name (local_name, [th]) lthy =
let
fun make_name_binding suffix local_name =
let val base_local_name = Long_Name.base_name local_name
- in
- Binding.qualified_name
- ((case base_local_name of
- "" => name
- | _ => base_local_name)
- ^(case suffix of
- SOME "prf" => "_prf"
- | SOME "def" => "_def"
- | _ => ""))
+ in Binding.qualified_name
+ ((case base_local_name of "" => name | _ => base_local_name) ^
+ (case suffix
+ of SOME "prf" => "_prf"
+ | SOME "def" => "_def"
+ | _ => ""))
end
val (prems, concl) =
(Logic.strip_assums_hyp (Thm.prop_of th),
- Logic.strip_assums_concl (Thm.prop_of th))
+ Logic.strip_assums_concl (Thm.prop_of th))
in
- if not (Lib.is_typing concl) then
- ([], lthy)
+ if not (Lib.is_typing concl) then ([], lthy)
else let
val prems_vars = distinct Term.aconv (flat
(map (Lib.collect_subterms is_Var) prems))
@@ -91,18 +84,16 @@ fun define_proof_term name (local_name, [th]) lthy =
val params = inter Term.aconv concl_vars prems_vars
- val prf_tm =
- fold_rev lambda params (Lib.term_of_typing concl)
+ val prf_tm = fold_rev lambda params (Lib.term_of_typing concl)
val ((_, (_, raw_def)), lthy') = Local_Theory.define
((make_name_binding NONE local_name, Mixfix.NoSyn),
((make_name_binding (SOME "prf") local_name, []), prf_tm)) lthy
- val def =
- fold
- (fn th1 => fn th2 => Thm.combination th2 th1)
- (map (Thm.reflexive o Thm.cterm_of lthy) params)
- raw_def
+ val def = fold
+ (fn th1 => fn th2 => Thm.combination th2 th1)
+ (map (Thm.reflexive o Thm.cterm_of lthy) params)
+ raw_def
val ((_, def'), lthy'') = Local_Theory.note
((make_name_binding (SOME "def") local_name, []), [def])
@@ -112,26 +103,26 @@ fun define_proof_term name (local_name, [th]) lthy =
end
end
| define_proof_term _ _ _ = error
- ("Unimplemented: handling proof terms of multiple facts in"
- ^" single result")
+ ("Unimplemented: proof terms for multiple facts in one statement")
fun gen_schematic_theorem
- bundle_includes prep_att prep_stmt
- gen_prf long kind before_qed after_qed (name, raw_atts)
- raw_includes raw_elems raw_concl int lthy =
+ bundle_includes prep_att prep_stmt
+ gen_prf_tm long kind
+ before_qed after_qed
+ (name, raw_atts) raw_includes raw_elems raw_concl
+ do_print lthy
+ =
let
- val _ = Local_Theory.assert lthy;
-
+ val _ = Local_Theory.assert lthy
val elems = raw_elems |> map (Element.map_ctxt_attrib (prep_att lthy))
val ((more_atts, prems, stmt, facts), goal_ctxt) = lthy
|> bundle_includes raw_includes
|> prep_statement (prep_att lthy) prep_stmt elems raw_concl
val atts = more_atts @ map (prep_att lthy) raw_atts
val pos = Position.thread_data ()
-
val prems_name = if long then Auto_Bind.assmsN else Auto_Bind.thatN
- fun after_qed' results goal_ctxt' =
+ fun gen_and_after_qed results goal_ctxt' =
let
val results' = burrow
(map (Goal.norm_result lthy) o Proof_Context.export goal_ctxt' lthy)
@@ -147,35 +138,34 @@ fun gen_schematic_theorem
true)
val (res', lthy'') =
- if gen_prf
+ if gen_prf_tm
then
let
- val (prf_tm_defs, lthy'') =
- fold
- (fn result => fn (defs, lthy) =>
- apfst (fn new_defs => defs @ new_defs)
- (define_proof_term (Binding.name_of name) result lthy))
- res ([], lthy')
-
+ val (prf_tm_defs, new_lthy) = fold
+ (fn result => fn (defs, lthy) =>
+ apfst (fn new_defs => defs @ new_defs)
+ (define_proof_term (Binding.name_of name) result lthy))
+ res
+ ([], lthy')
val res_folded =
- map (apsnd (map (Local_Defs.fold lthy'' prf_tm_defs))) res
+ map (apsnd (map (Local_Defs.fold new_lthy prf_tm_defs))) res
in
Local_Theory.notes_kind kind
[((name, @{attributes [typechk]} @ atts),
[(maps #2 res_folded, [])])]
- lthy''
+ new_lthy
end
else
Local_Theory.notes_kind kind
[((name, atts), [(maps #2 res, [])])]
lthy'
- val _ = Proof_Display.print_results int pos lthy''
+ val _ = Proof_Display.print_results do_print pos lthy''
((kind, Binding.name_of name), map (fn (_, ths) => ("", ths)) res')
val _ =
if substmts then map
- (fn (name, ths) => Proof_Display.print_results int pos lthy''
+ (fn (name, ths) => Proof_Display.print_results do_print pos lthy''
(("and", name), [("", ths)]))
res
else []
@@ -186,7 +176,7 @@ fun gen_schematic_theorem
goal_ctxt
|> not (null prems) ?
(Proof_Context.note_thmss "" [((Binding.name prems_name, []), [(prems, [])])] #> snd)
- |> Proof.theorem before_qed after_qed' (map snd stmt)
+ |> Proof.theorem before_qed gen_and_after_qed (map snd stmt)
|> (case facts of NONE => I | SOME ths => Proof.refine_insert ths)
end
@@ -194,16 +184,16 @@ val schematic_theorem_cmd =
gen_schematic_theorem
Bundle.includes_cmd
Attrib.check_src
- Expression.read_statement
+ Elaborated_Expression.read_statement
fun theorem spec descr =
- Outer_Syntax.local_theory_to_proof' spec ("state " ^ descr)
- (Scan.option (Args.parens (Args.$$$ "derive"))
- -- (long_statement || short_statement) >>
- (fn (opt_derive, (long, binding, includes, elems, concl)) =>
- schematic_theorem_cmd
- (case opt_derive of SOME "derive" => true | _ => false)
- long descr NONE (K I) binding includes elems concl))
+ Outer_Syntax.local_theory_to_proof' spec ("state " ^ descr)
+ ( Scan.option (Args.parens (Args.$$$ "derive"))
+ -- (long_statement || short_statement) >>
+ (fn (opt_derive, (long, binding, includes, elems, concl)) =>
+ schematic_theorem_cmd
+ (case opt_derive of SOME "derive" => true | _ => false)
+ long descr NONE (K I) binding includes elems concl) )
fun definition spec descr =
Outer_Syntax.local_theory_to_proof' spec "definition via proof"
@@ -211,7 +201,6 @@ fun definition spec descr =
(fn (long, binding, includes, elems, concl) => schematic_theorem_cmd
true long descr NONE (K I) binding includes elems concl))
-
in
val _ = theorem \<^command_keyword>\<open>Theorem\<close> "Theorem"
diff --git a/spartan/core/lib.ML b/spartan/core/lib.ML
index 7b93a08..392ae2e 100644
--- a/spartan/core/lib.ML
+++ b/spartan/core/lib.ML
@@ -6,13 +6,16 @@ val max: ('a * 'a -> bool) -> 'a list -> 'a
val maxint: int list -> int
(*Terms*)
-val is_rigid: term -> bool
val no_vars: term -> bool
+val is_rigid: term -> bool
+val is_eq: term -> bool
+val dest_prop: term -> term
val dest_eq: term -> term * term
val mk_Var: string -> int -> typ -> term
val lambda_var: term -> term -> term
val is_typing: term -> bool
+val mk_typing: term -> term -> term
val dest_typing: term -> term * term
val term_of_typing: term -> term
val type_of_typing: term -> term
@@ -21,6 +24,7 @@ val mk_Pi: term -> term -> term -> term
val typing_of_term: term -> term
(*Goals*)
+val decompose_goal: Proof.context -> term -> term list * term
val rigid_typing_concl: term -> bool
(*Subterms*)
@@ -49,9 +53,15 @@ val maxint = max (op >)
(* Meta *)
+val no_vars = not o exists_subterm is_Var
+
val is_rigid = not o is_Var o head_of
-val no_vars = not o exists_subterm is_Var
+fun is_eq (Const (\<^const_name>\<open>Pure.eq\<close>, _) $ _ $ _) = true
+ | is_eq _ = false
+
+fun dest_prop (Const (\<^const_name>\<open>Pure.prop\<close>, _) $ P) = P
+ | dest_prop P = P
fun dest_eq (Const (\<^const_name>\<open>Pure.eq\<close>, _) $ t $ def) = (t, def)
| dest_eq _ = error "dest_eq"
@@ -72,8 +82,10 @@ fun lambda_var x tm =
fun is_typing (Const (\<^const_name>\<open>has_type\<close>, _) $ _ $ _) = true
| is_typing _ = false
+fun mk_typing t T = \<^const>\<open>has_type\<close> $ t $ T
+
fun dest_typing (Const (\<^const_name>\<open>has_type\<close>, _) $ t $ T) = (t, T)
- | dest_typing _ = error "dest_typing"
+ | dest_typing t = raise TERM ("dest_typing", [t])
val term_of_typing = #1 o dest_typing
val type_of_typing = #2 o dest_typing
@@ -82,11 +94,28 @@ fun mk_Pi v typ body = Const (\<^const_name>\<open>Pi\<close>, dummyT) $ typ $ l
fun typing_of_term tm = \<^const>\<open>has_type\<close> $ tm $ Var (("*?", 0), \<^typ>\<open>o\<close>)
(*The above is a bit hacky; basically we need to guarantee that the schematic
- var is fresh*)
+ var is fresh. This works for now because no other code in the Isabelle system
+ or the current logic uses this identifier.*)
(** Goals **)
+(*Breaks a goal \<And>x ... y. \<lbrakk>P1; ... Pn\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Q into ([P1, ..., Pn], Q), fixing
+ \<And>-quantified variables and keeping schematics.*)
+fun decompose_goal ctxt goal =
+ let
+ val focus =
+ #1 (Subgoal.focus_prems ctxt 1 NONE (Thm.trivial (Thm.cterm_of ctxt goal)))
+
+ val schematics = #2 (#schematics focus)
+ |> map (fn (v, ctm) => (Thm.term_of ctm, Var v))
+ in
+ map Thm.prop_of (#prems focus) @ [Thm.term_of (#concl focus)]
+ |> map (subst_free schematics)
+ |> (fn xs => chop (length xs - 1) xs) |> apsnd the_single
+ end
+ handle List.Empty => error "Lib.decompose_goal"
+
fun rigid_typing_concl goal =
let val concl = Logic.strip_assums_concl goal
in is_typing concl andalso is_rigid (term_of_typing concl) end
diff --git a/spartan/core/typechecking.ML b/spartan/core/typechecking.ML
index 946ecd6..57164a1 100644
--- a/spartan/core/typechecking.ML
+++ b/spartan/core/typechecking.ML
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ val types: Proof.context -> term -> thm list
val put_type: thm -> Proof.context -> Proof.context
val put_types: thm list -> Proof.context -> Proof.context
+val debug_typechk: bool Config.T
+
val known_ctac: thm list -> int -> context_tactic
val check_infer: thm list -> int -> context_tactic
@@ -35,6 +37,12 @@ fun put_types typings = foldr1 (op o) (map put_type typings)
(* Context tactics for type-checking *)
+val debug_typechk =
+ Attrib.setup_config_bool \<^binding>\<open>debug_typechk\<close> (K false)
+
+fun debug_tac ctxt s =
+ if Config.get ctxt debug_typechk then print_tac ctxt s else all_tac
+
(*Solves goals without metavariables and type inference problems by resolving
with facts or assumption from inline premises.*)
fun known_ctac facts = CONTEXT_SUBGOAL (fn (goal, i) => fn (ctxt, st) =>
@@ -46,42 +54,43 @@ fun known_ctac facts = CONTEXT_SUBGOAL (fn (goal, i) => fn (ctxt, st) =>
let val ths = facts
(*FIXME: Shouldn't pull nameless facts directly from context*)
@ map fst (Facts.props (Proof_Context.facts_of ctxt))
- in (resolve_tac ctxt ths i ORELSE assume_tac ctxt i) st end
+ |> map (Simplifier.norm_hhf ctxt)
+ in
+ (debug_tac ctxt "resolve" THEN resolve_tac ctxt ths i ORELSE
+ debug_tac ctxt "assume" THEN assume_tac ctxt i) st
+ end
else Seq.empty
end)
(*Simple bidirectional typing tactic, with some nondeterminism from backtracking
search over arbitrary `typechk` rules. The current implementation does not
perform any normalization.*)
-local
- fun check_infer_step facts i (ctxt, st) =
- let
- val tac = SUBGOAL (fn (goal, i) =>
- if Lib.rigid_typing_concl goal
- then
- let val net = Tactic.build_net (facts
- (*MAYBE FIXME: Remove `typechk` from this list, and instead perform
- definitional unfolding to (w?)hnf.*)
- @(Named_Theorems.get ctxt \<^named_theorems>\<open>typechk\<close>)
- @(Named_Theorems.get ctxt \<^named_theorems>\<open>form\<close>)
- @(Named_Theorems.get ctxt \<^named_theorems>\<open>intro\<close>)
- @(map #1 (Elim.rules ctxt)))
- in (resolve_from_net_tac ctxt net) i end
- else no_tac)
- val ctxt' = ctxt
- in
- TACTIC_CONTEXT ctxt' (tac i st)
- end
-in
+fun check_infer_step facts i (ctxt, st) =
+ let
+ val tac = SUBGOAL (fn (goal, i) =>
+ if Lib.rigid_typing_concl goal
+ then
+ let val net = Tactic.build_net (facts
+ (*MAYBE FIXME: Remove `typechk` from this list, and instead perform
+ definitional unfolding to (w?)hnf.*)
+ @(Named_Theorems.get ctxt \<^named_theorems>\<open>typechk\<close>)
+ @(Named_Theorems.get ctxt \<^named_theorems>\<open>form\<close>)
+ @(Named_Theorems.get ctxt \<^named_theorems>\<open>intro\<close>)
+ @(map #1 (Elim.rules ctxt)))
+ in (resolve_from_net_tac ctxt net) i end
+ else no_tac)
+
+ val ctxt' = ctxt (*TODO: Use this to store already-derived typing judgments*)
+ in
+ TACTIC_CONTEXT ctxt' (tac i st)
+ end
fun check_infer facts i (cst as (_, st)) =
- let
- val ctac = known_ctac facts CORELSE' check_infer_step facts
+ let val ctac = known_ctac facts CORELSE' check_infer_step facts
in
cst |> (ctac i CTHEN
CREPEAT_IN_RANGE i (Thm.nprems_of st - i) (CTRY o CREPEAT_ALL_NEW_FWD ctac))
end
-end
end