diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | spartan/core/Goals.thy | 199 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 199 deletions
diff --git a/spartan/core/Goals.thy b/spartan/core/Goals.thy deleted file mode 100644 index f7bcaf5..0000000 --- a/spartan/core/Goals.thy +++ /dev/null @@ -1,199 +0,0 @@ -theory Goals -imports Spartan - -begin - -ML \<open> -val long_keyword = - Parse_Spec.includes >> K "" || - Parse_Spec.long_statement_keyword - -val long_statement = - Scan.optional - (Parse_Spec.opt_thm_name ":" --| Scan.ahead long_keyword) - Binding.empty_atts - -- Scan.optional Parse_Spec.includes [] - -- Parse_Spec.long_statement - >> (fn ((binding, includes), (elems, concl)) => - (binding, includes, elems, concl)) - -val short_statement = - Parse_Spec.statement -- Parse_Spec.if_statement -- Parse.for_fixes - >> (fn ((shows, assumes), fixes) => - (false, Binding.empty_atts, [], - [Element.Fixes fixes, Element.Assumes assumes], - Element.Shows shows)) - -fun prep_statement prep_att prep_stmt raw_elems raw_stmt ctxt = - let - val (stmt, elems_ctxt) = prep_stmt raw_elems raw_stmt ctxt - val prems = Assumption.local_prems_of elems_ctxt ctxt - val stmt_ctxt = fold (fold (Proof_Context.augment o fst) o snd) - stmt elems_ctxt - in - case raw_stmt of - Element.Shows _ => - let val stmt' = Attrib.map_specs (map prep_att) stmt - in (([], prems, stmt', NONE), stmt_ctxt) end - | Element.Obtains raw_obtains => - let - val asms_ctxt = stmt_ctxt - |> fold (fn ((name, _), asm) => - snd o Proof_Context.add_assms Assumption.assume_export - [((name, [Context_Rules.intro_query NONE]), asm)]) stmt - val that = Assumption.local_prems_of asms_ctxt stmt_ctxt - val ([(_, that')], that_ctxt) = asms_ctxt - |> Proof_Context.set_stmt true - |> Proof_Context.note_thmss "" - [((Binding.name Auto_Bind.thatN, []), [(that, [])])] - ||> Proof_Context.restore_stmt asms_ctxt - - val stmt' = [ - (Binding.empty_atts, - [(#2 (#1 (Obtain.obtain_thesis ctxt)), [])]) - ] - in - ((Obtain.obtains_attribs raw_obtains, prems, stmt', SOME that'), - that_ctxt) - end - end - -fun define_proof_term name (local_name, [th]) lthy = - let - fun make_name_binding suffix local_name = - let val base_local_name = Long_Name.base_name local_name - in - Binding.qualified_name - ((case base_local_name of - "" => name - | _ => base_local_name) - ^(case suffix of - SOME "prf" => "_prf" - | SOME "def" => "_def" - | _ => "")) - end - - val (prems, concl) = - (Logic.strip_assums_hyp (Thm.prop_of th), - Logic.strip_assums_concl (Thm.prop_of th)) - in - if not (Lib.is_typing concl) then - ([], lthy) - else let - val prems_vars = distinct Term.aconv (flat - (map (Lib.collect_subterms is_Var) prems)) - - val concl_vars = Lib.collect_subterms is_Var - (Lib.term_of_typing concl) - - val params = inter Term.aconv concl_vars prems_vars - - val prf_tm = - fold_rev lambda params (Lib.term_of_typing concl) - - val ((_, (_, raw_def)), lthy') = Local_Theory.define - ((make_name_binding NONE local_name, Mixfix.NoSyn), - ((make_name_binding (SOME "prf") local_name, []), prf_tm)) lthy - - val def = - fold - (fn th1 => fn th2 => Thm.combination th2 th1) - (map (Thm.reflexive o Thm.cterm_of lthy) params) - raw_def - - val ((_, def'), lthy'') = Local_Theory.note - ((make_name_binding (SOME "def") local_name, []), [def]) - lthy' - in - (def', lthy'') - end - end - | define_proof_term _ _ _ = error - ("Unimplemented: handling proof terms of multiple facts in" - ^" single result") - -fun gen_schematic_theorem - bundle_includes prep_att prep_stmt - gen_prf long kind before_qed after_qed (name, raw_atts) - raw_includes raw_elems raw_concl int lthy = - let - val _ = Local_Theory.assert lthy; - - val elems = raw_elems |> map (Element.map_ctxt_attrib (prep_att lthy)) - val ((more_atts, prems, stmt, facts), goal_ctxt) = lthy - |> bundle_includes raw_includes - |> prep_statement (prep_att lthy) prep_stmt elems raw_concl - val atts = more_atts @ map (prep_att lthy) raw_atts - val pos = Position.thread_data () - - val prems_name = if long then Auto_Bind.assmsN else Auto_Bind.thatN - - fun after_qed' results goal_ctxt' = - let - val results' = burrow - (map (Goal.norm_result lthy) o Proof_Context.export goal_ctxt' lthy) - results - - val ((res, lthy'), substmts) = - if forall (Binding.is_empty_atts o fst) stmt - then ((map (pair "") results', lthy), false) - else - (Local_Theory.notes_kind kind - (map2 (fn (b, _) => fn ths => (b, [(ths, [])])) stmt results') - lthy, - true) - - val (res', lthy'') = - if gen_prf - then - let - val (prf_tm_defs, lthy'') = - fold - (fn result => fn (defs, lthy) => - apfst (fn new_defs => defs @ new_defs) - (define_proof_term (Binding.name_of name) result lthy)) - res ([], lthy') - - val res_folded = - map (apsnd (map (Local_Defs.fold lthy'' prf_tm_defs))) res - in - Local_Theory.notes_kind kind - [((name, @{attributes [typechk]} @ atts), - [(maps #2 res_folded, [])])] - lthy'' - end - else - Local_Theory.notes_kind kind - [((name, atts), [(maps #2 res, [])])] - lthy' - - val _ = Proof_Display.print_results int pos lthy'' - ((kind, Binding.name_of name), map (fn (_, ths) => ("", ths)) res') - - val _ = - if substmts then map - (fn (name, ths) => Proof_Display.print_results int pos lthy'' - (("and", name), [("", ths)])) - res - else [] - in - after_qed results' lthy'' - end - in - goal_ctxt - |> not (null prems) ? - (Proof_Context.note_thmss "" [((Binding.name prems_name, []), [(prems, [])])] #> snd) - |> Proof.theorem before_qed after_qed' (map snd stmt) - |> (case facts of NONE => I | SOME ths => Proof.refine_insert ths) - end - -val schematic_theorem_cmd = - gen_schematic_theorem - Bundle.includes_cmd - Attrib.check_src - Expression.read_statement -\<close> - - - -end |