From 581ccee156457b0f84696def59fc324c1cbbdaba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eduardo Julian Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 00:51:00 -0400 Subject: Falling back to using the old method of JVM generation while I properly debug and optimize the new one. --- new-luxc/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/function.lux | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'new-luxc/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/function.lux') diff --git a/new-luxc/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/function.lux b/new-luxc/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/function.lux index 34a4c890e..7a4bbef4e 100644 --- a/new-luxc/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/function.lux +++ b/new-luxc/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/function.lux @@ -240,16 +240,12 @@ (_.INVOKESPECIAL class "" (init-method env function-arity)) _.ARETURN)) )))) - _.fuse) - failureI (|>> (_.INVOKESTATIC //.$Runtime "apply_fail" (type.method [(list) type.void (list)])) - _.NULL - _.ARETURN)] + _.fuse)] (def.method #$.Public $.noneM runtime.apply-method (runtime.apply-signature apply-arity) (|>> get-amount-of-partialsI (_.TABLESWITCH +0 (|> num-partials dec .int) @default @labels) casesI - failureI )))) (def: #export with-environment -- cgit v1.2.3