From 00ca2ba61759b59a17b59c56b347f83f089fabd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eduardo Julian Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 01:25:47 -0400 Subject: Properly implemented and enabled loop optimization. --- lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/case.lux | 3 +-- lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/loop.lux | 25 ++++++++++++----------- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) (limited to 'lux-jvm') diff --git a/lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/case.lux b/lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/case.lux index 23f84ad4e..421f413a0 100644 --- a/lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/case.lux +++ b/lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/case.lux @@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ [archive (#+ Archive)]] [language [lux - ["." synthesis (#+ Path Synthesis) - ["#/." case]]]]]]] + ["." synthesis (#+ Path Synthesis)]]]]]] [luxc [lang [host diff --git a/lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/loop.lux b/lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/loop.lux index 10fb23cbd..27a7d58f9 100644 --- a/lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/loop.lux +++ b/lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/loop.lux @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ [number ["n" nat]] [collection - ["." list ("#/." functor monoid)]]] + ["." list ("#@." functor monoid)]]] [tool [compiler ["." phase] @@ -25,11 +25,11 @@ ["_" inst]]]]] ["." //]) -(def: (invariant? register changeS) +(def: (invariant? expected actual) (-> Register Synthesis Bit) - (case changeS - (^ (synthesis.variable/local var)) - (n.= register var) + (case actual + (^ (synthesis.variable/local actual)) + (n.= expected actual) _ false)) @@ -38,24 +38,25 @@ (Generator (List Synthesis)) (do {@ phase.monad} [[@begin start] generation.anchor - #let [end (|> argsS list.size dec (n.+ start)) - pairs (list.zip2 (list.n/range start end) - argsS)] + #let [pairs (|> argsS + list.enumerate + (list@map (function (_ [register argument]) + [(n.+ start register) argument])))] ## It may look weird that first I compile the values separately, ## and then I compile the stores/allocations. ## It must be done that way in order to avoid a potential bug. ## Let's say that you'll recur with 2 expressions: X and Y. ## If Y depends on the value of X, and you don't compile values ## and stores separately, then by the time Y is evaluated, it - ## will refer to the new value of X, instead of the old value, as - ## should be the case. + ## will refer to the new value of X, instead of the old value, and + ## shouldn't be the case. valuesI+ (monad.map @ (function (_ [register argS]) (: (Operation Inst) (if (invariant? register argS) (wrap function.identity) (translate archive argS)))) pairs) - #let [storesI+ (list/map (function (_ [register argS]) + #let [storesI+ (list@map (function (_ [register argS]) (: Inst (if (invariant? register argS) function.identity @@ -73,7 +74,7 @@ iterationI (generation.with-anchor [@begin start] (translate archive iterationS)) #let [initializationI (|> (list.enumerate initsI+) - (list/map (function (_ [register initI]) + (list@map (function (_ [register initI]) (|>> initI (_.ASTORE (n.+ start register))))) _.fuse)]] -- cgit v1.2.3