From 464b6e8f5e6c62f58fa8c7ff61ab2ad215e98bd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eduardo Julian
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 23:02:01 -0400
Subject: Improved single-line comment syntax (from "##" to "...").

---
 lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/loop.lux | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

(limited to 'lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/loop.lux')

diff --git a/lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/loop.lux b/lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/loop.lux
index bd1e29d0f..85187815d 100644
--- a/lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/loop.lux
+++ b/lux-jvm/source/luxc/lang/translation/jvm/loop.lux
@@ -44,14 +44,14 @@
                      list.enumeration
                      (list@map (function (_ [register argument])
                                  [(n.+ start register) argument])))]
-     ## It may look weird that first I compile the values separately,
-     ## and then I compile the stores/allocations.
-     ## It must be done that way in order to avoid a potential bug.
-     ## Let's say that you'll recur with 2 expressions: X and Y.
-     ## If Y depends on the value of X, and you don't compile values
-     ## and stores separately, then by the time Y is evaluated, it
-     ## will refer to the new value of X, instead of the old value, and
-     ## shouldn't be the case.
+     ... It may look weird that first I compile the values separately,
+     ... and then I compile the stores/allocations.
+     ... It must be done that way in order to avoid a potential bug.
+     ... Let's say that you'll recur with 2 expressions: X and Y.
+     ... If Y depends on the value of X, and you don't compile values
+     ... and stores separately, then by the time Y is evaluated, it
+     ... will refer to the new value of X, instead of the old value, and
+     ... shouldn't be the case.
      valuesI+ (monad.map @ (function (_ [register argS])
                              (: (Operation Inst)
                                 (if (invariant? register argS)
-- 
cgit v1.2.3