(** Properties about the hashmap *) module Hashmap.Properties open Primitives open FStar.List.Tot open FStar.Mul open Hashmap.Types open Hashmap.Clauses open Hashmap.Funs #set-options "--z3rlimit 50 --fuel 0 --ifuel 1" let _align_fsti = () /// The proofs: /// =========== /// /// The proof strategy is to do exactly as with Low* proofs (we initially tried to /// prove more properties in one go, but it was a mistake): /// - prove that, under some preconditions, the low-level functions translated /// from Rust refine some higher-level functions /// - do functional proofs about those high-level functions to prove interesting /// properties about the hash map operations, and invariant preservation /// - combine everything /// /// The fact that we work in a pure setting allows us to be more modular than when /// working with effects. For instance we can do a case disjunction (see the proofs /// for insert, which study the cases where the key is already/not in the hash map /// in separate proofs - we had initially tried to do them in one step: it is doable /// but requires some work, and the F* response time quickly becomes annoying while /// making progress, so we split them). We can also easily prove a refinement lemma, /// study the model, *then* combine those to also prove that the low-level function /// preserves the invariants, rather than do everything at once as is usually the /// case when doing intrinsic proofs with effects (I remember that having to prove /// invariants in one go *and* a refinement step, even small, can be extremely /// difficult in Low*). (*** Utilities *) /// We need many small helpers and lemmas, mostly about lists (and the ones we list /// here are not in the standard F* library). val index_append_lem (#a : Type0) (ls0 ls1 : list a) (i : nat{i < length ls0 + length ls1}) : Lemma ( (i < length ls0 ==> index (ls0 @ ls1) i == index ls0 i) /\ (i >= length ls0 ==> index (ls0 @ ls1) i == index ls1 (i - length ls0))) [SMTPat (index (ls0 @ ls1) i)] #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec index_append_lem #a ls0 ls1 i = match ls0 with | [] -> () | x :: ls0' -> if i = 0 then () else index_append_lem ls0' ls1 (i-1) #pop-options val index_map_lem (#a #b: Type0) (f : a -> Tot b) (ls : list a) (i : nat{i < length ls}) : Lemma ( index (map f ls) i == f (index ls i)) [SMTPat (index (map f ls) i)] #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec index_map_lem #a #b f ls i = match ls with | [] -> () | x :: ls' -> if i = 0 then () else index_map_lem f ls' (i-1) #pop-options val for_all_append (#a : Type0) (f : a -> Tot bool) (ls0 ls1 : list a) : Lemma (for_all f (ls0 @ ls1) = (for_all f ls0 && for_all f ls1)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec for_all_append #a f ls0 ls1 = match ls0 with | [] -> () | x :: ls0' -> for_all_append f ls0' ls1 #pop-options /// Filter a list, stopping after we removed one element val filter_one (#a : Type) (f : a -> bool) (ls : list a) : list a let rec filter_one #a f ls = match ls with | [] -> [] | x :: ls' -> if f x then x :: filter_one f ls' else ls' val find_append (#a : Type) (f : a -> bool) (ls0 ls1 : list a) : Lemma ( find f (ls0 @ ls1) == begin match find f ls0 with | Some x -> Some x | None -> find f ls1 end) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec find_append #a f ls0 ls1 = match ls0 with | [] -> () | x :: ls0' -> if f x then begin assert(ls0 @ ls1 == x :: (ls0' @ ls1)); assert(find f (ls0 @ ls1) == find f (x :: (ls0' @ ls1))); // Why do I have to do this?! Is it because of subtyping?? assert( match find f (ls0 @ ls1) with | Some x' -> x' == x | None -> False) end else find_append f ls0' ls1 #pop-options val length_flatten_update : #a:Type -> ls:list (list a) -> i:nat{i < length ls} -> x:list a -> Lemma ( // We want this property: // ``` // length (flatten (list_update ls i x)) = // length (flatten ls) - length (index ls i) + length x // ``` length (flatten (list_update ls i x)) + length (index ls i) = length (flatten ls) + length x) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec length_flatten_update #a ls i x = match ls with | x' :: ls' -> assert(flatten ls == x' @ flatten ls'); // Triggers patterns assert(length (flatten ls) == length x' + length (flatten ls')); if i = 0 then begin let ls1 = x :: ls' in assert(list_update ls i x == ls1); assert(flatten ls1 == x @ flatten ls'); // Triggers patterns assert(length (flatten ls1) == length x + length (flatten ls')); () end else begin length_flatten_update ls' (i-1) x; let ls1 = x' :: list_update ls' (i-1) x in assert(flatten ls1 == x' @ flatten (list_update ls' (i-1) x)) // Triggers patterns end #pop-options val length_flatten_index : #a:Type -> ls:list (list a) -> i:nat{i < length ls} -> Lemma ( length (flatten ls) >= length (index ls i)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec length_flatten_index #a ls i = match ls with | x' :: ls' -> assert(flatten ls == x' @ flatten ls'); // Triggers patterns assert(length (flatten ls) == length x' + length (flatten ls')); if i = 0 then () else length_flatten_index ls' (i-1) #pop-options val forall_index_equiv_list_for_all (#a : Type) (pred : a -> Tot bool) (ls : list a) : Lemma ((forall (i:nat{i < length ls}). pred (index ls i)) <==> for_all pred ls) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec forall_index_equiv_list_for_all pred ls = match ls with | [] -> () | x :: ls' -> assert(forall (i:nat{i < length ls'}). index ls' i == index ls (i+1)); assert(forall (i:nat{0 < i /\ i < length ls}). index ls i == index ls' (i-1)); assert(index ls 0 == x); forall_index_equiv_list_for_all pred ls' #pop-options val find_update: #a:Type -> f:(a -> Tot bool) -> ls:list a -> x:a -> ls':list a{length ls' == length ls} #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec find_update #a f ls x = match ls with | [] -> [] | hd::tl -> if f hd then x :: tl else hd :: find_update f tl x #pop-options val pairwise_distinct : #a:eqtype -> ls:list a -> Tot bool let rec pairwise_distinct (#a : eqtype) (ls : list a) : Tot bool = match ls with | [] -> true | x :: ls' -> List.Tot.for_all (fun y -> x <> y) ls' && pairwise_distinct ls' val pairwise_rel : #a:Type -> pred:(a -> a -> Tot bool) -> ls:list a -> Tot bool let rec pairwise_rel #a pred ls = match ls with | [] -> true | x :: ls' -> for_all (pred x) ls' && pairwise_rel pred ls' #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec flatten_append (#a : Type) (l1 l2: list (list a)) : Lemma (flatten (l1 @ l2) == flatten l1 @ flatten l2) = match l1 with | [] -> () | x :: l1' -> flatten_append l1' l2; append_assoc x (flatten l1') (flatten l2) #pop-options /// We don't use anonymous functions as parameters to other functions, but rather /// introduce auxiliary functions instead: otherwise we can't reason (because /// F*'s encoding to the SMT is imprecise for functions) let fst_is_disctinct (#a : eqtype) (#b : Type0) (p0 : a & b) (p1 : a & b) : Type0 = fst p0 <> fst p1 (*** Lemmas about Primitives *) /// TODO: move those lemmas // TODO: rename to 'insert'? val list_update_index_dif_lem (#a : Type0) (ls : list a) (i : nat{i < length ls}) (x : a) (j : nat{j < length ls}) : Lemma (requires (j <> i)) (ensures (index (list_update ls i x) j == index ls j)) [SMTPat (index (list_update ls i x) j)] #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec list_update_index_dif_lem #a ls i x j = match ls with | x' :: ls -> if i = 0 then () else if j = 0 then () else list_update_index_dif_lem ls (i-1) x (j-1) #pop-options val map_list_update_lem (#a #b: Type0) (f : a -> Tot b) (ls : list a) (i : nat{i < length ls}) (x : a) : Lemma (list_update (map f ls) i (f x) == map f (list_update ls i x)) [SMTPat (list_update (map f ls) i (f x))] #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec map_list_update_lem #a #b f ls i x = match ls with | x' :: ls' -> if i = 0 then () else map_list_update_lem f ls' (i-1) x #pop-options (*** Invariants, models *) (**** Internals *) /// The following invariants, models, representation functions... are mostly /// for the purpose of the proofs. let is_pos_usize (n : nat) : Type0 = 0 < n /\ n <= usize_max type pos_usize = x:usize{x > 0} type binding (t : Type0) = key & t type slots_t (t : Type0) = vec (list_t t) /// We represent hash maps as associative lists type assoc_list (t : Type0) = list (binding t) /// Representation function for [list_t] let rec list_t_v (#t : Type0) (ls : list_t t) : assoc_list t = match ls with | ListNil -> [] | ListCons k v tl -> (k,v) :: list_t_v tl let list_t_len (#t : Type0) (ls : list_t t) : nat = length (list_t_v ls) let list_t_index (#t : Type0) (ls : list_t t) (i : nat{i < list_t_len ls}) : binding t = index (list_t_v ls) i type slot_s (t : Type0) = list (binding t) type slots_s (t : Type0) = list (slot_s t) type slot_t (t : Type0) = list_t t let slot_t_v #t = list_t_v #t /// Representation function for the slots. let slots_t_v (#t : Type0) (slots : slots_t t) : slots_s t = map slot_t_v slots /// Representation function for the slots, seen as an associative list. let slots_t_al_v (#t : Type0) (slots : slots_t t) : assoc_list t = flatten (map list_t_v slots) /// High-level type for the hash-map, seen as a list of associative lists (one /// list per slot). This is the representation we use most, internally. Note that /// we later introduce a [map_s] representation, which is the one used in the /// lemmas shown to the user. type hash_map_s t = list (slot_s t) // TODO: why not always have the condition on the length? // 'nes': "non-empty slots" type hash_map_s_nes (t : Type0) : Type0 = hm:hash_map_s t{is_pos_usize (length hm)} /// Representation function for [hash_map_t] as a list of slots let hash_map_t_v (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) : hash_map_s t = map list_t_v hm.hash_map_slots /// Representation function for [hash_map_t] as an associative list let hash_map_t_al_v (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) : assoc_list t = flatten (hash_map_t_v hm) // 'nes': "non-empty slots" type hash_map_t_nes (t : Type0) : Type0 = hm:hash_map_t t{is_pos_usize (length hm.hash_map_slots)} let hash_key (k : key) : hash = Return?.v (hash_key_fwd k) let hash_mod_key (k : key) (len : usize{len > 0}) : hash = (hash_key k) % len let not_same_key (#t : Type0) (k : key) (b : binding t) : bool = fst b <> k let same_key (#t : Type0) (k : key) (b : binding t) : bool = fst b = k // We take a [nat] instead of a [hash] on purpose let same_hash_mod_key (#t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (h : nat) (b : binding t) : bool = hash_mod_key (fst b) len = h let binding_neq (#t : Type0) (b0 b1 : binding t) : bool = fst b0 <> fst b1 let hash_map_t_len_s (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) : nat = hm.hash_map_num_entries let assoc_list_find (#t : Type0) (k : key) (slot : assoc_list t) : option t = match find (same_key k) slot with | None -> None | Some (_, v) -> Some v let slot_s_find (#t : Type0) (k : key) (slot : list (binding t)) : option t = assoc_list_find k slot let slot_t_find_s (#t : Type0) (k : key) (slot : list_t t) : option t = slot_s_find k (slot_t_v slot) // This is a simpler version of the "find" function, which captures the essence // of what happens and operates on [hash_map_s]. let hash_map_s_find (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (k : key) : option t = let i = hash_mod_key k (length hm) in let slot = index hm i in slot_s_find k slot let hash_map_s_len (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s t) : nat = length (flatten hm) // Same as above, but operates on [hash_map_t] // Note that we don't reuse the above function on purpose: converting to a // [hash_map_s] then looking up an element is not the same as what we // wrote below. let hash_map_t_find_s (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t{length hm.hash_map_slots > 0}) (k : key) : option t = let slots = hm.hash_map_slots in let i = hash_mod_key k (length slots) in let slot = index slots i in slot_t_find_s k slot /// Invariants for the slots let slot_s_inv (#t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (i : usize) (slot : list (binding t)) : bool = // All the bindings are in the proper slot for_all (same_hash_mod_key len i) slot && // All the keys are pairwise distinct pairwise_rel binding_neq slot let slot_t_inv (#t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (i : usize) (slot : list_t t) : bool = slot_s_inv len i (slot_t_v slot) let slots_s_inv (#t : Type0) (slots : slots_s t{length slots <= usize_max}) : Type0 = forall(i:nat{i < length slots}). {:pattern index slots i} slot_s_inv (length slots) i (index slots i) // At some point we tried to rewrite this in terms of [slots_s_inv]. However it // made a lot of proofs fail because those proofs relied on the [index_map_lem] // pattern. We tried writing others lemmas with patterns (like [slots_s_inv] // implies [slots_t_inv]) but it didn't succeed, so we keep things as they are. let slots_t_inv (#t : Type0) (slots : slots_t t{length slots <= usize_max}) : Type0 = forall(i:nat{i < length slots}). {:pattern index slots i} slot_t_inv (length slots) i (index slots i) let hash_map_s_inv (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s t) : Type0 = length hm <= usize_max /\ length hm > 0 /\ slots_s_inv hm /// Base invariant for the hashmap (the complete invariant can be temporarily /// broken between the moment we inserted an element and the moment we resize) let hash_map_t_base_inv (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) : Type0 = let al = hash_map_t_al_v hm in // [num_entries] correctly tracks the number of entries in the table // Note that it gives us that the length of the slots array is <= usize_max: // [> length <= usize_max // (because hash_map_num_entries has type `usize`) hm.hash_map_num_entries = length al /\ // Slots invariant slots_t_inv hm.hash_map_slots /\ // The capacity must be > 0 (otherwise we can't resize, because we // multiply the capacity by two!) length hm.hash_map_slots > 0 /\ // Load computation begin let capacity = length hm.hash_map_slots in let (dividend, divisor) = hm.hash_map_max_load_factor in 0 < dividend /\ dividend < divisor /\ capacity * dividend >= divisor /\ hm.hash_map_max_load = (capacity * dividend) / divisor end /// We often need to frame some values let hash_map_t_same_params (#t : Type0) (hm0 hm1 : hash_map_t t) : Type0 = length hm0.hash_map_slots = length hm1.hash_map_slots /\ hm0.hash_map_max_load = hm1.hash_map_max_load /\ hm0.hash_map_max_load_factor = hm1.hash_map_max_load_factor /// The following invariants, etc. are meant to be revealed to the user through /// the .fsti. /// Invariant for the hashmap let hash_map_t_inv (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) : Type0 = // Base invariant hash_map_t_base_inv hm /\ // The hash map is either: not overloaded, or we can't resize it begin let (dividend, divisor) = hm.hash_map_max_load_factor in hm.hash_map_num_entries <= hm.hash_map_max_load || length hm.hash_map_slots * 2 * dividend > usize_max end (*** .fsti *) /// We reveal slightly different version of the above functions to the user let len_s (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) : nat = hash_map_t_len_s hm /// This version doesn't take any precondition (contrary to [hash_map_t_find_s]) let find_s (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) (k : key) : option t = if length hm.hash_map_slots = 0 then None else hash_map_t_find_s hm k (*** Overloading *) let hash_map_not_overloaded_lem #t hm = () (*** allocate_slots *) /// Auxiliary lemma val slots_t_all_nil_inv_lem (#t : Type0) (slots : vec (list_t t){length slots <= usize_max}) : Lemma (requires (forall (i:nat{i < length slots}). index slots i == ListNil)) (ensures (slots_t_inv slots)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let slots_t_all_nil_inv_lem #t slots = () #pop-options val slots_t_al_v_all_nil_is_empty_lem (#t : Type0) (slots : vec (list_t t)) : Lemma (requires (forall (i:nat{i < length slots}). index slots i == ListNil)) (ensures (slots_t_al_v slots == [])) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec slots_t_al_v_all_nil_is_empty_lem #t slots = match slots with | [] -> () | s :: slots' -> assert(forall (i:nat{i < length slots'}). index slots' i == index slots (i+1)); slots_t_al_v_all_nil_is_empty_lem #t slots'; assert(slots_t_al_v slots == list_t_v s @ slots_t_al_v slots'); assert(slots_t_al_v slots == list_t_v s); assert(index slots 0 == ListNil) #pop-options /// [allocate_slots] val hash_map_allocate_slots_fwd_lem (t : Type0) (slots : vec (list_t t)) (n : usize) : Lemma (requires (length slots + n <= usize_max)) (ensures ( match hash_map_allocate_slots_fwd t slots n with | Fail _ -> False | Return slots' -> length slots' = length slots + n /\ // We leave the already allocated slots unchanged (forall (i:nat{i < length slots}). index slots' i == index slots i) /\ // We allocate n additional empty slots (forall (i:nat{length slots <= i /\ i < length slots'}). index slots' i == ListNil))) (decreases (hash_map_allocate_slots_decreases t slots n)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_allocate_slots_fwd_lem t slots n = begin match n with | 0 -> () | _ -> begin match vec_push_back (list_t t) slots ListNil with | Fail _ -> () | Return slots1 -> begin match usize_sub n 1 with | Fail _ -> () | Return i -> hash_map_allocate_slots_fwd_lem t slots1 i; begin match hash_map_allocate_slots_fwd t slots1 i with | Fail _ -> () | Return slots2 -> assert(length slots1 = length slots + 1); assert(slots1 == slots @ [ListNil]); // Triggers patterns assert(index slots1 (length slots) == index [ListNil] 0); // Triggers patterns assert(index slots1 (length slots) == ListNil) end end end end #pop-options (*** new_with_capacity *) /// Under proper conditions, [new_with_capacity] doesn't fail and returns an empty hash map. val hash_map_new_with_capacity_fwd_lem (t : Type0) (capacity : usize) (max_load_dividend : usize) (max_load_divisor : usize) : Lemma (requires ( 0 < max_load_dividend /\ max_load_dividend < max_load_divisor /\ 0 < capacity /\ capacity * max_load_dividend >= max_load_divisor /\ capacity * max_load_dividend <= usize_max)) (ensures ( match hash_map_new_with_capacity_fwd t capacity max_load_dividend max_load_divisor with | Fail _ -> False | Return hm -> // The hash map invariant is satisfied hash_map_t_inv hm /\ // The parameters are correct hm.hash_map_max_load_factor = (max_load_dividend, max_load_divisor) /\ hm.hash_map_max_load = (capacity * max_load_dividend) / max_load_divisor /\ // The hash map has the specified capacity - we need to reveal this // otherwise the pre of [hash_map_t_find_s] is not satisfied. length hm.hash_map_slots = capacity /\ // The hash map has 0 values hash_map_t_len_s hm = 0 /\ // It contains no bindings (forall k. hash_map_t_find_s hm k == None) /\ // We need this low-level property for the invariant (forall(i:nat{i < length hm.hash_map_slots}). index hm.hash_map_slots i == ListNil))) #push-options "--z3rlimit 50 --fuel 1" let hash_map_new_with_capacity_fwd_lem (t : Type0) (capacity : usize) (max_load_dividend : usize) (max_load_divisor : usize) = let v = vec_new (list_t t) in assert(length v = 0); hash_map_allocate_slots_fwd_lem t v capacity; begin match hash_map_allocate_slots_fwd t v capacity with | Fail _ -> assert(False) | Return v0 -> begin match usize_mul capacity max_load_dividend with | Fail _ -> assert(False) | Return i -> begin match usize_div i max_load_divisor with | Fail _ -> assert(False) | Return i0 -> let hm = Mkhash_map_t 0 (max_load_dividend, max_load_divisor) i0 v0 in slots_t_all_nil_inv_lem v0; slots_t_al_v_all_nil_is_empty_lem hm.hash_map_slots end end end #pop-options (*** new *) /// [new] doesn't fail and returns an empty hash map val hash_map_new_fwd_lem_aux (t : Type0) : Lemma (ensures ( match hash_map_new_fwd t with | Fail _ -> False | Return hm -> // The hash map invariant is satisfied hash_map_t_inv hm /\ // The hash map has 0 values hash_map_t_len_s hm = 0 /\ // It contains no bindings (forall k. hash_map_t_find_s hm k == None))) #push-options "--fuel 1" let hash_map_new_fwd_lem_aux t = hash_map_new_with_capacity_fwd_lem t 32 4 5; match hash_map_new_with_capacity_fwd t 32 4 5 with | Fail _ -> () | Return hm -> () #pop-options /// The lemma we reveal in the .fsti let hash_map_new_fwd_lem t = hash_map_new_fwd_lem_aux t (*** clear_slots *) /// [clear_slots] doesn't fail and simply clears the slots starting at index i #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_clear_slots_fwd_back_lem (t : Type0) (slots : vec (list_t t)) (i : usize) : Lemma (ensures ( match hash_map_clear_slots_fwd_back t slots i with | Fail _ -> False | Return slots' -> // The length is preserved length slots' == length slots /\ // The slots before i are left unchanged (forall (j:nat{j < i /\ j < length slots}). index slots' j == index slots j) /\ // The slots after i are set to ListNil (forall (j:nat{i <= j /\ j < length slots}). index slots' j == ListNil))) (decreases (hash_map_clear_slots_decreases t slots i)) = let i0 = vec_len (list_t t) slots in let b = i < i0 in if b then begin match vec_index_mut_back (list_t t) slots i ListNil with | Fail _ -> () | Return v -> begin match usize_add i 1 with | Fail _ -> () | Return i1 -> hash_map_clear_slots_fwd_back_lem t v i1; begin match hash_map_clear_slots_fwd_back t v i1 with | Fail _ -> () | Return slots1 -> assert(length slots1 == length slots); assert(forall (j:nat{i+1 <= j /\ j < length slots}). index slots1 j == ListNil); assert(index slots1 i == ListNil) end end end else () #pop-options (*** clear *) /// [clear] doesn't fail and turns the hash map into an empty map val hash_map_clear_fwd_back_lem_aux (#t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t t) : Lemma (requires (hash_map_t_base_inv self)) (ensures ( match hash_map_clear_fwd_back t self with | Fail _ -> False | Return hm -> // The hash map invariant is satisfied hash_map_t_base_inv hm /\ // We preserved the parameters hash_map_t_same_params hm self /\ // The hash map has 0 values hash_map_t_len_s hm = 0 /\ // It contains no bindings (forall k. hash_map_t_find_s hm k == None))) // Being lazy: fuel 1 helps a lot... #push-options "--fuel 1" let hash_map_clear_fwd_back_lem_aux #t self = let p = self.hash_map_max_load_factor in let i = self.hash_map_max_load in let v = self.hash_map_slots in hash_map_clear_slots_fwd_back_lem t v 0; begin match hash_map_clear_slots_fwd_back t v 0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return slots1 -> slots_t_al_v_all_nil_is_empty_lem slots1; let hm1 = Mkhash_map_t 0 p i slots1 in assert(hash_map_t_base_inv hm1); assert(hash_map_t_inv hm1) end #pop-options let hash_map_clear_fwd_back_lem #t self = hash_map_clear_fwd_back_lem_aux #t self (*** len *) /// [len]: we link it to a non-failing function. /// Rk.: we might want to make an analysis to not use an error monad to translate /// functions which statically can't fail. let hash_map_len_fwd_lem #t self = () (*** insert_in_list *) (**** insert_in_list'fwd *) /// [insert_in_list_fwd]: returns true iff the key is not in the list (functional version) val hash_map_insert_in_list_fwd_lem (t : Type0) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list_t t) : Lemma (ensures ( match hash_map_insert_in_list_fwd t key value ls with | Fail _ -> False | Return b -> b <==> (slot_t_find_s key ls == None))) (decreases (hash_map_insert_in_list_decreases t key value ls)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_insert_in_list_fwd_lem t key value ls = begin match ls with | ListCons ckey cvalue ls0 -> let b = ckey = key in if b then () else begin hash_map_insert_in_list_fwd_lem t key value ls0; match hash_map_insert_in_list_fwd t key value ls0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return b0 -> () end | ListNil -> assert(list_t_v ls == []); assert_norm(find (same_key #t key) [] == None) end #pop-options (**** insert_in_list'back *) /// The proofs about [insert_in_list] backward are easier to do in several steps: /// extrinsic proofs to the rescue! /// We first prove that [insert_in_list] refines the function we wrote above, then /// use this function to prove the invariants, etc. /// We write a helper which "captures" what [insert_in_list] does. /// We then reason about this helper to prove the high-level properties we want /// (functional properties, preservation of invariants, etc.). let hash_map_insert_in_list_s (#t : Type0) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list (binding t)) : list (binding t) = // Check if there is already a binding for the key match find (same_key key) ls with | None -> // No binding: append the binding to the end ls @ [(key,value)] | Some _ -> // There is already a binding: update it find_update (same_key key) ls (key,value) /// [insert_in_list]: if the key is not in the map, appends a new bindings (functional version) val hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_append_s (t : Type0) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list_t t) : Lemma (requires ( slot_t_find_s key ls == None)) (ensures ( match hash_map_insert_in_list_back t key value ls with | Fail _ -> False | Return ls' -> list_t_v ls' == list_t_v ls @ [(key,value)])) (decreases (hash_map_insert_in_list_decreases t key value ls)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_append_s t key value ls = begin match ls with | ListCons ckey cvalue ls0 -> let b = ckey = key in if b then () else begin hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_append_s t key value ls0; match hash_map_insert_in_list_back t key value ls0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return l -> () end | ListNil -> () end #pop-options /// [insert_in_list]: if the key is in the map, we update the binding (functional version) val hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_update_s (t : Type0) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list_t t) : Lemma (requires ( Some? (find (same_key key) (list_t_v ls)))) (ensures ( match hash_map_insert_in_list_back t key value ls with | Fail _ -> False | Return ls' -> list_t_v ls' == find_update (same_key key) (list_t_v ls) (key,value))) (decreases (hash_map_insert_in_list_decreases t key value ls)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_update_s t key value ls = begin match ls with | ListCons ckey cvalue ls0 -> let b = ckey = key in if b then () else begin hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_update_s t key value ls0; match hash_map_insert_in_list_back t key value ls0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return l -> () end | ListNil -> () end #pop-options /// Put everything together val hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_s (t : Type0) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list_t t) : Lemma (ensures ( match hash_map_insert_in_list_back t key value ls with | Fail _ -> False | Return ls' -> list_t_v ls' == hash_map_insert_in_list_s key value (list_t_v ls))) let hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_s t key value ls = match find (same_key key) (list_t_v ls) with | None -> hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_append_s t key value ls | Some _ -> hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_update_s t key value ls (**** Invariants of insert_in_list_s *) /// Auxiliary lemmas /// We work on [hash_map_insert_in_list_s], the "high-level" version of [insert_in_list'back]. /// /// Note that in F* we can't have recursive proofs inside of other proofs, contrary /// to Coq, which makes it a bit cumbersome to prove auxiliary results like the /// following ones... (** Auxiliary lemmas: append case *) val slot_t_v_for_all_binding_neq_append_lem (t : Type0) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list (binding t)) (b : binding t) : Lemma (requires ( fst b <> key /\ for_all (binding_neq b) ls /\ slot_s_find key ls == None)) (ensures ( for_all (binding_neq b) (ls @ [(key,value)]))) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec slot_t_v_for_all_binding_neq_append_lem t key value ls b = match ls with | [] -> () | (ck, cv) :: cls -> slot_t_v_for_all_binding_neq_append_lem t key value cls b #pop-options val slot_s_inv_not_find_append_end_inv_lem (t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list (binding t)) : Lemma (requires ( slot_s_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls /\ slot_s_find key ls == None)) (ensures ( let ls' = ls @ [(key,value)] in slot_s_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls' /\ (slot_s_find key ls' == Some value) /\ (forall k'. k' <> key ==> slot_s_find k' ls' == slot_s_find k' ls))) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec slot_s_inv_not_find_append_end_inv_lem t len key value ls = match ls with | [] -> () | (ck, cv) :: cls -> slot_s_inv_not_find_append_end_inv_lem t len key value cls; let h = hash_mod_key key len in let ls' = ls @ [(key,value)] in assert(for_all (same_hash_mod_key len h) ls'); slot_t_v_for_all_binding_neq_append_lem t key value cls (ck, cv); assert(pairwise_rel binding_neq ls'); assert(slot_s_inv len h ls') #pop-options /// [insert_in_list]: if the key is not in the map, appends a new bindings val hash_map_insert_in_list_s_lem_append (t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list (binding t)) : Lemma (requires ( slot_s_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls /\ slot_s_find key ls == None)) (ensures ( let ls' = hash_map_insert_in_list_s key value ls in ls' == ls @ [(key,value)] /\ // The invariant is preserved slot_s_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls' /\ // [key] maps to [value] slot_s_find key ls' == Some value /\ // The other bindings are preserved (forall k'. k' <> key ==> slot_s_find k' ls' == slot_s_find k' ls))) let hash_map_insert_in_list_s_lem_append t len key value ls = slot_s_inv_not_find_append_end_inv_lem t len key value ls /// [insert_in_list]: if the key is not in the map, appends a new bindings (quantifiers) /// Rk.: we don't use this lemma. /// TODO: remove? val hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_append (t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list_t t) : Lemma (requires ( slot_t_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls /\ slot_t_find_s key ls == None)) (ensures ( match hash_map_insert_in_list_back t key value ls with | Fail _ -> False | Return ls' -> list_t_v ls' == list_t_v ls @ [(key,value)] /\ // The invariant is preserved slot_t_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls' /\ // [key] maps to [value] slot_t_find_s key ls' == Some value /\ // The other bindings are preserved (forall k'. k' <> key ==> slot_t_find_s k' ls' == slot_t_find_s k' ls))) let hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_append t len key value ls = hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_s t key value ls; hash_map_insert_in_list_s_lem_append t len key value (list_t_v ls) (** Auxiliary lemmas: update case *) val slot_s_find_update_for_all_binding_neq_append_lem (t : Type0) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list (binding t)) (b : binding t) : Lemma (requires ( fst b <> key /\ for_all (binding_neq b) ls)) (ensures ( let ls' = find_update (same_key key) ls (key, value) in for_all (binding_neq b) ls')) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec slot_s_find_update_for_all_binding_neq_append_lem t key value ls b = match ls with | [] -> () | (ck, cv) :: cls -> slot_s_find_update_for_all_binding_neq_append_lem t key value cls b #pop-options /// Annoying auxiliary lemma we have to prove because there is no way to reason /// properly about closures. /// I'm really enjoying my time. val for_all_binding_neq_value_indep (#t : Type0) (key : key) (v0 v1 : t) (ls : list (binding t)) : Lemma (for_all (binding_neq (key,v0)) ls = for_all (binding_neq (key,v1)) ls) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec for_all_binding_neq_value_indep #t key v0 v1 ls = match ls with | [] -> () | _ :: ls' -> for_all_binding_neq_value_indep #t key v0 v1 ls' #pop-options val slot_s_inv_find_append_end_inv_lem (t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list (binding t)) : Lemma (requires ( slot_s_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls /\ Some? (slot_s_find key ls))) (ensures ( let ls' = find_update (same_key key) ls (key, value) in slot_s_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls' /\ (slot_s_find key ls' == Some value) /\ (forall k'. k' <> key ==> slot_s_find k' ls' == slot_s_find k' ls))) #push-options "--z3rlimit 50 --fuel 1" let rec slot_s_inv_find_append_end_inv_lem t len key value ls = match ls with | [] -> () | (ck, cv) :: cls -> let h = hash_mod_key key len in let ls' = find_update (same_key key) ls (key, value) in if ck = key then begin assert(ls' == (ck,value) :: cls); assert(for_all (same_hash_mod_key len h) ls'); // For pairwise_rel: binding_neq (ck, value) is actually independent // of `value`. Slightly annoying to prove in F*... assert(for_all (binding_neq (ck,cv)) cls); for_all_binding_neq_value_indep key cv value cls; assert(for_all (binding_neq (ck,value)) cls); assert(pairwise_rel binding_neq ls'); assert(slot_s_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls') end else begin slot_s_inv_find_append_end_inv_lem t len key value cls; assert(for_all (same_hash_mod_key len h) ls'); slot_s_find_update_for_all_binding_neq_append_lem t key value cls (ck, cv); assert(pairwise_rel binding_neq ls'); assert(slot_s_inv len h ls') end #pop-options /// [insert_in_list]: if the key is in the map, update the bindings val hash_map_insert_in_list_s_lem_update (t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list (binding t)) : Lemma (requires ( slot_s_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls /\ Some? (slot_s_find key ls))) (ensures ( let ls' = hash_map_insert_in_list_s key value ls in ls' == find_update (same_key key) ls (key,value) /\ // The invariant is preserved slot_s_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls' /\ // [key] maps to [value] slot_s_find key ls' == Some value /\ // The other bindings are preserved (forall k'. k' <> key ==> slot_s_find k' ls' == slot_s_find k' ls))) let hash_map_insert_in_list_s_lem_update t len key value ls = slot_s_inv_find_append_end_inv_lem t len key value ls /// [insert_in_list]: if the key is in the map, update the bindings /// TODO: not used: remove? val hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_update (t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list_t t) : Lemma (requires ( slot_t_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls /\ Some? (slot_t_find_s key ls))) (ensures ( match hash_map_insert_in_list_back t key value ls with | Fail _ -> False | Return ls' -> let als = list_t_v ls in list_t_v ls' == find_update (same_key key) als (key,value) /\ // The invariant is preserved slot_t_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls' /\ // [key] maps to [value] slot_t_find_s key ls' == Some value /\ // The other bindings are preserved (forall k'. k' <> key ==> slot_t_find_s k' ls' == slot_t_find_s k' ls))) let hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_update t len key value ls = hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_s t key value ls; hash_map_insert_in_list_s_lem_update t len key value (list_t_v ls) (** Final lemmas about [insert_in_list] *) /// High-level version val hash_map_insert_in_list_s_lem (t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list (binding t)) : Lemma (requires ( slot_s_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls)) (ensures ( let ls' = hash_map_insert_in_list_s key value ls in // The invariant is preserved slot_s_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls' /\ // [key] maps to [value] slot_s_find key ls' == Some value /\ // The other bindings are preserved (forall k'. k' <> key ==> slot_s_find k' ls' == slot_s_find k' ls) /\ // The length is incremented, iff we inserted a new key (match slot_s_find key ls with | None -> length ls' = length ls + 1 | Some _ -> length ls' = length ls))) let hash_map_insert_in_list_s_lem t len key value ls = match slot_s_find key ls with | None -> assert_norm(length [(key,value)] = 1); hash_map_insert_in_list_s_lem_append t len key value ls | Some _ -> hash_map_insert_in_list_s_lem_update t len key value ls /// [insert_in_list] /// TODO: not used: remove? val hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem (t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (key : usize) (value : t) (ls : list_t t) : Lemma (requires (slot_t_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls)) (ensures ( match hash_map_insert_in_list_back t key value ls with | Fail _ -> False | Return ls' -> // The invariant is preserved slot_t_inv len (hash_mod_key key len) ls' /\ // [key] maps to [value] slot_t_find_s key ls' == Some value /\ // The other bindings are preserved (forall k'. k' <> key ==> slot_t_find_s k' ls' == slot_t_find_s k' ls) /\ // The length is incremented, iff we inserted a new key (match slot_t_find_s key ls with | None -> list_t_v ls' == list_t_v ls @ [(key,value)] /\ list_t_len ls' = list_t_len ls + 1 | Some _ -> list_t_v ls' == find_update (same_key key) (list_t_v ls) (key,value) /\ list_t_len ls' = list_t_len ls))) (decreases (hash_map_insert_in_list_decreases t key value ls)) let hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem t len key value ls = hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem_s t key value ls; hash_map_insert_in_list_s_lem t len key value (list_t_v ls) (*** insert_no_resize *) (**** Refinement proof *) /// Same strategy as for [insert_in_list]: we introduce a high-level version of /// the function, and reason about it. /// We work on [hash_map_s] (we use a higher-level view of the hash-map, but /// not too high). /// A high-level version of insert, which doesn't check if the table is saturated let hash_map_insert_no_fail_s (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (key : usize) (value : t) : hash_map_s t = let len = length hm in let i = hash_mod_key key len in let slot = index hm i in let slot' = hash_map_insert_in_list_s key value slot in let hm' = list_update hm i slot' in hm' // TODO: at some point I used hash_map_s_nes and it broke proofs...x let hash_map_insert_no_resize_s (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (key : usize) (value : t) : result (hash_map_s t) = // Check if the table is saturated (too many entries, and we need to insert one) let num_entries = length (flatten hm) in if None? (hash_map_s_find hm key) && num_entries = usize_max then Fail Failure else Return (hash_map_insert_no_fail_s hm key value) /// Prove that [hash_map_insert_no_resize_s] is refined by /// [hash_map_insert_no_resize'fwd_back] val hash_map_insert_no_resize_fwd_back_lem_s (t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t t) (key : usize) (value : t) : Lemma (requires ( hash_map_t_base_inv self /\ hash_map_s_len (hash_map_t_v self) = hash_map_t_len_s self)) (ensures ( begin match hash_map_insert_no_resize_fwd_back t self key value, hash_map_insert_no_resize_s (hash_map_t_v self) key value with | Fail _, Fail _ -> True | Return hm, Return hm_v -> hash_map_t_base_inv hm /\ hash_map_t_same_params hm self /\ hash_map_t_v hm == hm_v /\ hash_map_s_len hm_v == hash_map_t_len_s hm | _ -> False end)) let hash_map_insert_no_resize_fwd_back_lem_s t self key value = begin match hash_key_fwd key with | Fail _ -> () | Return i -> let i0 = self.hash_map_num_entries in let p = self.hash_map_max_load_factor in let i1 = self.hash_map_max_load in let v = self.hash_map_slots in let i2 = vec_len (list_t t) v in let len = length v in begin match usize_rem i i2 with | Fail _ -> () | Return hash_mod -> begin match vec_index_mut_fwd (list_t t) v hash_mod with | Fail _ -> () | Return l -> begin // Checking that: list_t_v (index ...) == index (hash_map_t_v ...) ... assert(list_t_v l == index (hash_map_t_v self) hash_mod); hash_map_insert_in_list_fwd_lem t key value l; match hash_map_insert_in_list_fwd t key value l with | Fail _ -> () | Return b -> assert(b = None? (slot_s_find key (list_t_v l))); hash_map_insert_in_list_back_lem t len key value l; if b then begin match usize_add i0 1 with | Fail _ -> () | Return i3 -> begin match hash_map_insert_in_list_back t key value l with | Fail _ -> () | Return l0 -> begin match vec_index_mut_back (list_t t) v hash_mod l0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return v0 -> let self_v = hash_map_t_v self in let hm = Mkhash_map_t i3 p i1 v0 in let hm_v = hash_map_t_v hm in assert(hm_v == list_update self_v hash_mod (list_t_v l0)); assert_norm(length [(key,value)] = 1); assert(length (list_t_v l0) = length (list_t_v l) + 1); length_flatten_update self_v hash_mod (list_t_v l0); assert(hash_map_s_len hm_v = hash_map_t_len_s hm) end end end else begin match hash_map_insert_in_list_back t key value l with | Fail _ -> () | Return l0 -> begin match vec_index_mut_back (list_t t) v hash_mod l0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return v0 -> let self_v = hash_map_t_v self in let hm = Mkhash_map_t i0 p i1 v0 in let hm_v = hash_map_t_v hm in assert(hm_v == list_update self_v hash_mod (list_t_v l0)); assert(length (list_t_v l0) = length (list_t_v l)); length_flatten_update self_v hash_mod (list_t_v l0); assert(hash_map_s_len hm_v = hash_map_t_len_s hm) end end end end end end (**** insert_{no_fail,no_resize}: invariants *) let hash_map_s_updated_binding (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (key : usize) (opt_value : option t) (hm' : hash_map_s_nes t) : Type0 = // [key] maps to [value] hash_map_s_find hm' key == opt_value /\ // The other bindings are preserved (forall k'. k' <> key ==> hash_map_s_find hm' k' == hash_map_s_find hm k') let insert_post (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (key : usize) (value : t) (hm' : hash_map_s_nes t) : Type0 = // The invariant is preserved hash_map_s_inv hm' /\ // [key] maps to [value] and the other bindings are preserved hash_map_s_updated_binding hm key (Some value) hm' /\ // The length is incremented, iff we inserted a new key (match hash_map_s_find hm key with | None -> hash_map_s_len hm' = hash_map_s_len hm + 1 | Some _ -> hash_map_s_len hm' = hash_map_s_len hm) val hash_map_insert_no_fail_s_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (key : usize) (value : t) : Lemma (requires (hash_map_s_inv hm)) (ensures ( let hm' = hash_map_insert_no_fail_s hm key value in insert_post hm key value hm')) let hash_map_insert_no_fail_s_lem #t hm key value = let len = length hm in let i = hash_mod_key key len in let slot = index hm i in hash_map_insert_in_list_s_lem t len key value slot; let slot' = hash_map_insert_in_list_s key value slot in length_flatten_update hm i slot' val hash_map_insert_no_resize_s_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (key : usize) (value : t) : Lemma (requires (hash_map_s_inv hm)) (ensures ( match hash_map_insert_no_resize_s hm key value with | Fail _ -> // Can fail only if we need to create a new binding in // an already saturated map hash_map_s_len hm = usize_max /\ None? (hash_map_s_find hm key) | Return hm' -> insert_post hm key value hm')) let hash_map_insert_no_resize_s_lem #t hm key value = let num_entries = length (flatten hm) in if None? (hash_map_s_find hm key) && num_entries = usize_max then () else hash_map_insert_no_fail_s_lem hm key value (**** find after insert *) /// Lemmas about what happens if we call [find] after an insertion val hash_map_insert_no_resize_s_get_same_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s t) (key : usize) (value : t) : Lemma (requires (hash_map_s_inv hm)) (ensures ( match hash_map_insert_no_resize_s hm key value with | Fail _ -> True | Return hm' -> hash_map_s_find hm' key == Some value)) let hash_map_insert_no_resize_s_get_same_lem #t hm key value = let num_entries = length (flatten hm) in if None? (hash_map_s_find hm key) && num_entries = usize_max then () else begin let hm' = Return?.v (hash_map_insert_no_resize_s hm key value) in let len = length hm in let i = hash_mod_key key len in let slot = index hm i in hash_map_insert_in_list_s_lem t len key value slot end val hash_map_insert_no_resize_s_get_diff_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s t) (key : usize) (value : t) (key' : usize{key' <> key}) : Lemma (requires (hash_map_s_inv hm)) (ensures ( match hash_map_insert_no_resize_s hm key value with | Fail _ -> True | Return hm' -> hash_map_s_find hm' key' == hash_map_s_find hm key')) let hash_map_insert_no_resize_s_get_diff_lem #t hm key value key' = let num_entries = length (flatten hm) in if None? (hash_map_s_find hm key) && num_entries = usize_max then () else begin let hm' = Return?.v (hash_map_insert_no_resize_s hm key value) in let len = length hm in let i = hash_mod_key key len in let slot = index hm i in hash_map_insert_in_list_s_lem t len key value slot; let i' = hash_mod_key key' len in if i <> i' then () else begin () end end (*** move_elements_from_list *) /// Having a great time here: if we use `result (hash_map_s_res t)` as the /// return type for [hash_map_move_elements_from_list_s] instead of having this /// awkward match, the proof of [hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back_lem_refin] fails. /// I guess it comes from F*'s poor subtyping. /// Followingly, I'm not taking any chance and using [result_hash_map_s] /// everywhere. type result_hash_map_s_nes (t : Type0) : Type0 = res:result (hash_map_s t) { match res with | Fail _ -> True | Return hm -> is_pos_usize (length hm) } let rec hash_map_move_elements_from_list_s (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (ls : slot_s t) : // Do *NOT* use `result (hash_map_s t)` Tot (result_hash_map_s_nes t) (decreases ls) = match ls with | [] -> Return hm | (key, value) :: ls' -> match hash_map_insert_no_resize_s hm key value with | Fail e -> Fail e | Return hm' -> hash_map_move_elements_from_list_s hm' ls' /// Refinement lemma val hash_map_move_elements_from_list_fwd_back_lem (t : Type0) (ntable : hash_map_t_nes t) (ls : list_t t) : Lemma (requires (hash_map_t_base_inv ntable)) (ensures ( match hash_map_move_elements_from_list_fwd_back t ntable ls, hash_map_move_elements_from_list_s (hash_map_t_v ntable) (slot_t_v ls) with | Fail _, Fail _ -> True | Return hm', Return hm_v -> hash_map_t_base_inv hm' /\ hash_map_t_v hm' == hm_v /\ hash_map_t_same_params hm' ntable | _ -> False)) (decreases (hash_map_move_elements_from_list_decreases t ntable ls)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_move_elements_from_list_fwd_back_lem t ntable ls = begin match ls with | ListCons k v tl -> assert(list_t_v ls == (k, v) :: list_t_v tl); let ls_v = list_t_v ls in let (_,_) :: tl_v = ls_v in hash_map_insert_no_resize_fwd_back_lem_s t ntable k v; begin match hash_map_insert_no_resize_fwd_back t ntable k v with | Fail _ -> () | Return h -> let h_v = Return?.v (hash_map_insert_no_resize_s (hash_map_t_v ntable) k v) in assert(hash_map_t_v h == h_v); hash_map_move_elements_from_list_fwd_back_lem t h tl; begin match hash_map_move_elements_from_list_fwd_back t h tl with | Fail _ -> () | Return h0 -> () end end | ListNil -> () end #pop-options (*** move_elements *) (**** move_elements: refinement 0 *) /// The proof for [hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back_lem_refin] broke so many times /// (while it is supposed to be super simple!) that we decided to add one refinement /// level, to really do things step by step... /// Doing this refinement layer made me notice that maybe the problem came from /// the fact that at some point we have to prove `list_t_v ListNil == []`: I /// added the corresponding assert to help Z3 and everything became stable. /// I finally didn't use this "simple" refinement lemma, but I still keep it here /// because it allows for easy comparisons with [hash_map_move_elements_s]. /// [hash_map_move_elements_fwd] refines this function, which is actually almost /// the same (just a little bit shorter and cleaner, and has a pre). /// /// The way I wrote the high-level model is the following: /// - I copy-pasted the definition of [hash_map_move_elements_fwd], wrote the /// signature which links this new definition to [hash_map_move_elements_fwd] and /// checked that the proof passed /// - I gradually simplified it, while making sure the proof still passes #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_move_elements_s_simpl (t : Type0) (ntable : hash_map_t t) (slots : vec (list_t t)) (i : usize{i <= length slots /\ length slots <= usize_max}) : Pure (result ((hash_map_t t) & (vec (list_t t)))) (requires (True)) (ensures (fun res -> match res, hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back t ntable slots i with | Fail _, Fail _ -> True | Return (ntable1, slots1), Return (ntable2, slots2) -> ntable1 == ntable2 /\ slots1 == slots2 | _ -> False)) (decreases (hash_map_move_elements_decreases t ntable slots i)) = if i < length slots then let slot = index slots i in begin match hash_map_move_elements_from_list_fwd_back t ntable slot with | Fail e -> Fail e | Return hm' -> let slots' = list_update slots i ListNil in hash_map_move_elements_s_simpl t hm' slots' (i+1) end else Return (ntable, slots) #pop-options (**** move_elements: refinement 1 *) /// We prove a second refinement lemma: calling [move_elements] refines a function /// which, for every slot, moves the element out of the slot. This first model is /// almost exactly the translated function, it just uses `list` instead of `list_t`. // Note that we ignore the returned slots (we thus don't return a pair: // only the new hash map in which we moved the elements from the slots): // this returned value is not used. let rec hash_map_move_elements_s (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (slots : slots_s t) (i : usize{i <= length slots /\ length slots <= usize_max}) : Tot (result_hash_map_s_nes t) (decreases (length slots - i)) = let len = length slots in if i < len then begin let slot = index slots i in match hash_map_move_elements_from_list_s hm slot with | Fail e -> Fail e | Return hm' -> let slots' = list_update slots i [] in hash_map_move_elements_s hm' slots' (i+1) end else Return hm val hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back_lem_refin (t : Type0) (ntable : hash_map_t t) (slots : vec (list_t t)) (i : usize{i <= length slots}) : Lemma (requires ( hash_map_t_base_inv ntable)) (ensures ( match hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back t ntable slots i, hash_map_move_elements_s (hash_map_t_v ntable) (slots_t_v slots) i with | Fail _, Fail _ -> True // We will prove later that this is not possible | Return (ntable', _), Return ntable'_v -> hash_map_t_base_inv ntable' /\ hash_map_t_v ntable' == ntable'_v /\ hash_map_t_same_params ntable' ntable | _ -> False)) (decreases (length slots - i)) #restart-solver #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back_lem_refin t ntable slots i = assert(hash_map_t_base_inv ntable); let i0 = vec_len (list_t t) slots in let b = i < i0 in if b then begin match vec_index_mut_fwd (list_t t) slots i with | Fail _ -> () | Return l -> let l0 = mem_replace_fwd (list_t t) l ListNil in assert(l0 == l); hash_map_move_elements_from_list_fwd_back_lem t ntable l0; begin match hash_map_move_elements_from_list_fwd_back t ntable l0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return h -> let l1 = mem_replace_back (list_t t) l ListNil in assert(l1 == ListNil); assert(slot_t_v #t ListNil == []); // THIS IS IMPORTANT begin match vec_index_mut_back (list_t t) slots i l1 with | Fail _ -> () | Return v -> begin match usize_add i 1 with | Fail _ -> () | Return i1 -> hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back_lem_refin t h v i1; begin match hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back t h v i1 with | Fail _ -> assert(Fail? (hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back t ntable slots i)); () | Return (ntable', v0) -> () end end end end end else () #pop-options (**** move_elements: refinement 2 *) /// We prove a second refinement lemma: calling [move_elements] refines a function /// which moves every binding of the hash map seen as *one* associative list /// (and not a list of lists). /// [ntable] is the hash map to which we move the elements /// [slots] is the current hash map, from which we remove the elements, and seen /// as a "flat" associative list (and not a list of lists) /// This is actually exactly [hash_map_move_elements_from_list_s]... let rec hash_map_move_elements_s_flat (#t : Type0) (ntable : hash_map_s_nes t) (slots : assoc_list t) : Tot (result_hash_map_s_nes t) (decreases slots) = match slots with | [] -> Return ntable | (k,v) :: slots' -> match hash_map_insert_no_resize_s ntable k v with | Fail e -> Fail e | Return ntable' -> hash_map_move_elements_s_flat ntable' slots' /// The refinment lemmas /// First, auxiliary helpers. /// Flatten a list of lists, starting at index i val flatten_i : #a:Type -> l:list (list a) -> i:nat{i <= length l} -> Tot (list a) (decreases (length l - i)) let rec flatten_i l i = if i < length l then index l i @ flatten_i l (i+1) else [] let _ = assert(let l = [1;2] in l == hd l :: tl l) val flatten_i_incr : #a:Type -> l:list (list a) -> i:nat{Cons? l /\ i+1 <= length l} -> Lemma (ensures ( (**) assert_norm(length (hd l :: tl l) == 1 + length (tl l)); flatten_i l (i+1) == flatten_i (tl l) i)) (decreases (length l - (i+1))) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec flatten_i_incr l i = let x :: tl = l in if i + 1 < length l then begin assert(flatten_i l (i+1) == index l (i+1) @ flatten_i l (i+2)); flatten_i_incr l (i+1); assert(flatten_i l (i+2) == flatten_i tl (i+1)); assert(index l (i+1) == index tl i) end else () #pop-options val flatten_0_is_flatten : #a:Type -> l:list (list a) -> Lemma (ensures (flatten_i l 0 == flatten l)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec flatten_0_is_flatten #a l = match l with | [] -> () | x :: l' -> flatten_i_incr l 0; flatten_0_is_flatten l' #pop-options /// Auxiliary lemma val flatten_nil_prefix_as_flatten_i : #a:Type -> l:list (list a) -> i:nat{i <= length l} -> Lemma (requires (forall (j:nat{j < i}). index l j == [])) (ensures (flatten l == flatten_i l i)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec flatten_nil_prefix_as_flatten_i #a l i = if i = 0 then flatten_0_is_flatten l else begin let x :: l' = l in assert(index l 0 == []); assert(x == []); assert(flatten l == flatten l'); flatten_i_incr l (i-1); assert(flatten_i l i == flatten_i l' (i-1)); assert(forall (j:nat{j < length l'}). index l' j == index l (j+1)); flatten_nil_prefix_as_flatten_i l' (i-1); assert(flatten l' == flatten_i l' (i-1)) end #pop-options /// The proof is trivial, the functions are the same. /// Just keeping two definitions to allow changes... val hash_map_move_elements_from_list_s_as_flat_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (ls : slot_s t) : Lemma (ensures ( hash_map_move_elements_from_list_s hm ls == hash_map_move_elements_s_flat hm ls)) (decreases ls) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_move_elements_from_list_s_as_flat_lem #t hm ls = match ls with | [] -> () | (key, value) :: ls' -> match hash_map_insert_no_resize_s hm key value with | Fail _ -> () | Return hm' -> hash_map_move_elements_from_list_s_as_flat_lem hm' ls' #pop-options /// Composition of two calls to [hash_map_move_elements_s_flat] let hash_map_move_elements_s_flat_comp (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (slot0 slot1 : slot_s t) : Tot (result_hash_map_s_nes t) = match hash_map_move_elements_s_flat hm slot0 with | Fail e -> Fail e | Return hm1 -> hash_map_move_elements_s_flat hm1 slot1 /// High-level desc: /// move_elements (move_elements hm slot0) slo1 == move_elements hm (slot0 @ slot1) val hash_map_move_elements_s_flat_append_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (slot0 slot1 : slot_s t) : Lemma (ensures ( match hash_map_move_elements_s_flat_comp hm slot0 slot1, hash_map_move_elements_s_flat hm (slot0 @ slot1) with | Fail _, Fail _ -> True | Return hm1, Return hm2 -> hm1 == hm2 | _ -> False)) (decreases (slot0)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_move_elements_s_flat_append_lem #t hm slot0 slot1 = match slot0 with | [] -> () | (k,v) :: slot0' -> match hash_map_insert_no_resize_s hm k v with | Fail _ -> () | Return hm' -> hash_map_move_elements_s_flat_append_lem hm' slot0' slot1 #pop-options val flatten_i_same_suffix (#a : Type) (l0 l1 : list (list a)) (i : nat) : Lemma (requires ( i <= length l0 /\ length l0 = length l1 /\ (forall (j:nat{i <= j /\ j < length l0}). index l0 j == index l1 j))) (ensures (flatten_i l0 i == flatten_i l1 i)) (decreases (length l0 - i)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec flatten_i_same_suffix #a l0 l1 i = if i < length l0 then flatten_i_same_suffix l0 l1 (i+1) else () #pop-options /// Refinement lemma: /// [hash_map_move_elements_s] refines [hash_map_move_elements_s_flat] /// (actually the functions are equal on all inputs). val hash_map_move_elements_s_lem_refin_flat (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (slots : slots_s t) (i : nat{i <= length slots /\ length slots <= usize_max}) : Lemma (ensures ( match hash_map_move_elements_s hm slots i, hash_map_move_elements_s_flat hm (flatten_i slots i) with | Fail _, Fail _ -> True | Return hm, Return hm' -> hm == hm' | _ -> False)) (decreases (length slots - i)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_move_elements_s_lem_refin_flat #t hm slots i = let len = length slots in if i < len then begin let slot = index slots i in hash_map_move_elements_from_list_s_as_flat_lem hm slot; match hash_map_move_elements_from_list_s hm slot with | Fail _ -> assert(flatten_i slots i == slot @ flatten_i slots (i+1)); hash_map_move_elements_s_flat_append_lem hm slot (flatten_i slots (i+1)); assert(Fail? (hash_map_move_elements_s_flat hm (flatten_i slots i))) | Return hm' -> let slots' = list_update slots i [] in flatten_i_same_suffix slots slots' (i+1); hash_map_move_elements_s_lem_refin_flat hm' slots' (i+1); hash_map_move_elements_s_flat_append_lem hm slot (flatten_i slots' (i+1)); () end else () #pop-options let assoc_list_inv (#t : Type0) (al : assoc_list t) : Type0 = // All the keys are pairwise distinct pairwise_rel binding_neq al let disjoint_hm_al_on_key (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (al : assoc_list t) (k : key) : Type0 = match hash_map_s_find hm k, assoc_list_find k al with | Some _, None | None, Some _ | None, None -> True | Some _, Some _ -> False /// Playing a dangerous game here: using forall quantifiers let disjoint_hm_al (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (al : assoc_list t) : Type0 = forall (k:key). disjoint_hm_al_on_key hm al k let find_in_union_hm_al (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (al : assoc_list t) (k : key) : option t = match hash_map_s_find hm k with | Some b -> Some b | None -> assoc_list_find k al /// Auxiliary lemma val for_all_binding_neq_find_lem (#t : Type0) (k : key) (v : t) (al : assoc_list t) : Lemma (requires (for_all (binding_neq (k,v)) al)) (ensures (assoc_list_find k al == None)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec for_all_binding_neq_find_lem #t k v al = match al with | [] -> () | b :: al' -> for_all_binding_neq_find_lem k v al' #pop-options val hash_map_move_elements_s_flat_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t) (al : assoc_list t) : Lemma (requires ( // Invariants hash_map_s_inv hm /\ assoc_list_inv al /\ // The two are disjoint disjoint_hm_al hm al /\ // We can add all the elements to the hashmap hash_map_s_len hm + length al <= usize_max)) (ensures ( match hash_map_move_elements_s_flat hm al with | Fail _ -> False // We can't fail | Return hm' -> // The invariant is preserved hash_map_s_inv hm' /\ // The new hash map is the union of the two maps (forall (k:key). hash_map_s_find hm' k == find_in_union_hm_al hm al k) /\ hash_map_s_len hm' = hash_map_s_len hm + length al)) (decreases al) #restart-solver #push-options "--z3rlimit 200 --fuel 1" let rec hash_map_move_elements_s_flat_lem #t hm al = match al with | [] -> () | (k,v) :: al' -> hash_map_insert_no_resize_s_lem hm k v; match hash_map_insert_no_resize_s hm k v with | Fail _ -> () | Return hm' -> assert(hash_map_s_inv hm'); assert(assoc_list_inv al'); let disjoint_lem (k' : key) : Lemma (disjoint_hm_al_on_key hm' al' k') [SMTPat (disjoint_hm_al_on_key hm' al' k')] = if k' = k then begin assert(hash_map_s_find hm' k' == Some v); for_all_binding_neq_find_lem k v al'; assert(assoc_list_find k' al' == None) end else begin assert(hash_map_s_find hm' k' == hash_map_s_find hm k'); assert(assoc_list_find k' al' == assoc_list_find k' al) end in assert(disjoint_hm_al hm' al'); assert(hash_map_s_len hm' + length al' <= usize_max); hash_map_move_elements_s_flat_lem hm' al' #pop-options /// We need to prove that the invariants on the "low-level" representations of /// the hash map imply the invariants on the "high-level" representations. val slots_t_inv_implies_slots_s_inv (#t : Type0) (slots : slots_t t{length slots <= usize_max}) : Lemma (requires (slots_t_inv slots)) (ensures (slots_s_inv (slots_t_v slots))) let slots_t_inv_implies_slots_s_inv #t slots = // Ok, works fine: this lemma was useless. // Problem is: I can never really predict for sure with F*... () val hash_map_t_base_inv_implies_hash_map_s_inv (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) : Lemma (requires (hash_map_t_base_inv hm)) (ensures (hash_map_s_inv (hash_map_t_v hm))) let hash_map_t_base_inv_implies_hash_map_s_inv #t hm = () // same as previous /// Introducing a "partial" version of the hash map invariant, which operates on /// a suffix of the hash map. let partial_hash_map_s_inv (#t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (offset : usize) (hm : hash_map_s t{offset + length hm <= usize_max}) : Type0 = forall(i:nat{i < length hm}). {:pattern index hm i} slot_s_inv len (offset + i) (index hm i) /// Auxiliary lemma. /// If a binding comes from a slot i, then its key is different from the keys /// of the bindings in the other slots (because the hashes of the keys are distinct). val binding_in_previous_slot_implies_neq (#t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (i : usize) (b : binding t) (offset : usize{i < offset}) (slots : hash_map_s t{offset + length slots <= usize_max}) : Lemma (requires ( // The binding comes from a slot not in [slots] hash_mod_key (fst b) len = i /\ // The slots are the well-formed suffix of a hash map partial_hash_map_s_inv len offset slots)) (ensures ( for_all (binding_neq b) (flatten slots))) (decreases slots) #push-options "--z3rlimit 100 --fuel 1" let rec binding_in_previous_slot_implies_neq #t len i b offset slots = match slots with | [] -> () | s :: slots' -> assert(slot_s_inv len offset (index slots 0)); // Triggers patterns assert(slot_s_inv len offset s); // Proving TARGET. We use quantifiers. assert(for_all (same_hash_mod_key len offset) s); forall_index_equiv_list_for_all (same_hash_mod_key len offset) s; assert(forall (i:nat{i < length s}). same_hash_mod_key len offset (index s i)); let aux (i:nat{i < length s}) : Lemma (requires (same_hash_mod_key len offset (index s i))) (ensures (binding_neq b (index s i))) [SMTPat (index s i)] = () in assert(forall (i:nat{i < length s}). binding_neq b (index s i)); forall_index_equiv_list_for_all (binding_neq b) s; assert(for_all (binding_neq b) s); // TARGET // assert(forall (i:nat{i < length slots'}). index slots' i == index slots (i+1)); // Triggers instantiations binding_in_previous_slot_implies_neq len i b (offset+1) slots'; for_all_append (binding_neq b) s (flatten slots') #pop-options val partial_hash_map_s_inv_implies_assoc_list_lem (#t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (offset : usize) (hm : hash_map_s t{offset + length hm <= usize_max}) : Lemma (requires ( partial_hash_map_s_inv len offset hm)) (ensures (assoc_list_inv (flatten hm))) (decreases (length hm + length (flatten hm))) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec partial_hash_map_s_inv_implies_assoc_list_lem #t len offset hm = match hm with | [] -> () | slot :: hm' -> assert(flatten hm == slot @ flatten hm'); assert(forall (i:nat{i < length hm'}). index hm' i == index hm (i+1)); // Triggers instantiations match slot with | [] -> assert(flatten hm == flatten hm'); assert(partial_hash_map_s_inv len (offset+1) hm'); // Triggers instantiations partial_hash_map_s_inv_implies_assoc_list_lem len (offset+1) hm' | x :: slot' -> assert(flatten (slot' :: hm') == slot' @ flatten hm'); let hm'' = slot' :: hm' in assert(forall (i:nat{0 < i /\ i < length hm''}). index hm'' i == index hm i); // Triggers instantiations assert(forall (i:nat{0 < i /\ i < length hm''}). slot_s_inv len (offset + i) (index hm'' i)); assert(index hm 0 == slot); // Triggers instantiations assert(slot_s_inv len offset slot); assert(slot_s_inv len offset slot'); assert(partial_hash_map_s_inv len offset hm''); partial_hash_map_s_inv_implies_assoc_list_lem len offset (slot' :: hm'); // Proving that the key in `x` is different from all the other keys in // the flattened map assert(for_all (binding_neq x) slot'); for_all_append (binding_neq x) slot' (flatten hm'); assert(partial_hash_map_s_inv len (offset+1) hm'); binding_in_previous_slot_implies_neq #t len offset x (offset+1) hm'; assert(for_all (binding_neq x) (flatten hm')); assert(for_all (binding_neq x) (flatten (slot' :: hm'))) #pop-options val hash_map_s_inv_implies_assoc_list_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_s t) : Lemma (requires (hash_map_s_inv hm)) (ensures (assoc_list_inv (flatten hm))) let hash_map_s_inv_implies_assoc_list_lem #t hm = partial_hash_map_s_inv_implies_assoc_list_lem (length hm) 0 hm val hash_map_t_base_inv_implies_assoc_list_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t): Lemma (requires (hash_map_t_base_inv hm)) (ensures (assoc_list_inv (hash_map_t_al_v hm))) let hash_map_t_base_inv_implies_assoc_list_lem #t hm = hash_map_s_inv_implies_assoc_list_lem (hash_map_t_v hm) /// For some reason, we can't write the below [forall] directly in the [ensures] /// clause of the next lemma: it makes Z3 fails even with a huge rlimit. /// I have no idea what's going on. let hash_map_is_assoc_list (#t : Type0) (ntable : hash_map_t t{length ntable.hash_map_slots > 0}) (al : assoc_list t) : Type0 = (forall (k:key). hash_map_t_find_s ntable k == assoc_list_find k al) let partial_hash_map_s_find (#t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (offset : usize) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t{offset + length hm = len}) (k : key{hash_mod_key k len >= offset}) : option t = let i = hash_mod_key k len in let slot = index hm (i - offset) in slot_s_find k slot val not_same_hash_key_not_found_in_slot (#t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (k : key) (i : usize) (slot : slot_s t) : Lemma (requires ( hash_mod_key k len <> i /\ slot_s_inv len i slot)) (ensures (slot_s_find k slot == None)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec not_same_hash_key_not_found_in_slot #t len k i slot = match slot with | [] -> () | (k',v) :: slot' -> not_same_hash_key_not_found_in_slot len k i slot' #pop-options /// Small variation of [binding_in_previous_slot_implies_neq]: if the hash of /// a key links it to a previous slot, it can't be found in the slots after. val key_in_previous_slot_implies_not_found (#t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (k : key) (offset : usize) (slots : hash_map_s t{offset + length slots = len}) : Lemma (requires ( // The binding comes from a slot not in [slots] hash_mod_key k len < offset /\ // The slots are the well-formed suffix of a hash map partial_hash_map_s_inv len offset slots)) (ensures ( assoc_list_find k (flatten slots) == None)) (decreases slots) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec key_in_previous_slot_implies_not_found #t len k offset slots = match slots with | [] -> () | slot :: slots' -> find_append (same_key k) slot (flatten slots'); assert(index slots 0 == slot); // Triggers instantiations not_same_hash_key_not_found_in_slot #t len k offset slot; assert(assoc_list_find k slot == None); assert(forall (i:nat{i < length slots'}). index slots' i == index slots (i+1)); // Triggers instantiations key_in_previous_slot_implies_not_found len k (offset+1) slots' #pop-options val partial_hash_map_s_is_assoc_list_lem (#t : Type0) (len : usize{len > 0}) (offset : usize) (hm : hash_map_s_nes t{offset + length hm = len}) (k : key{hash_mod_key k len >= offset}) : Lemma (requires ( partial_hash_map_s_inv len offset hm)) (ensures ( partial_hash_map_s_find len offset hm k == assoc_list_find k (flatten hm))) (decreases hm) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec partial_hash_map_s_is_assoc_list_lem #t len offset hm k = match hm with | [] -> () | slot :: hm' -> let h = hash_mod_key k len in let i = h - offset in if i = 0 then begin // We must look in the current slot assert(partial_hash_map_s_find len offset hm k == slot_s_find k slot); find_append (same_key k) slot (flatten hm'); assert(forall (i:nat{i < length hm'}). index hm' i == index hm (i+1)); // Triggers instantiations key_in_previous_slot_implies_not_found #t len k (offset+1) hm'; assert( // Of course, writing `== None` doesn't work... match find (same_key k) (flatten hm') with | None -> True | Some _ -> False); assert( find (same_key k) (flatten hm) == begin match find (same_key k) slot with | Some x -> Some x | None -> find (same_key k) (flatten hm') end); () end else begin // We must ignore the current slot assert(partial_hash_map_s_find len offset hm k == partial_hash_map_s_find len (offset+1) hm' k); find_append (same_key k) slot (flatten hm'); assert(index hm 0 == slot); // Triggers instantiations not_same_hash_key_not_found_in_slot #t len k offset slot; assert(forall (i:nat{i < length hm'}). index hm' i == index hm (i+1)); // Triggers instantiations partial_hash_map_s_is_assoc_list_lem #t len (offset+1) hm' k end #pop-options val hash_map_is_assoc_list_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) : Lemma (requires (hash_map_t_base_inv hm)) (ensures (hash_map_is_assoc_list hm (hash_map_t_al_v hm))) let hash_map_is_assoc_list_lem #t hm = let aux (k:key) : Lemma (hash_map_t_find_s hm k == assoc_list_find k (hash_map_t_al_v hm)) [SMTPat (hash_map_t_find_s hm k)] = let hm_v = hash_map_t_v hm in let len = length hm_v in partial_hash_map_s_is_assoc_list_lem #t len 0 hm_v k in () /// The final lemma about [move_elements]: calling it on an empty hash table moves /// all the elements to this empty table. val hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back_lem (t : Type0) (ntable : hash_map_t t) (slots : vec (list_t t)) : Lemma (requires ( let al = flatten (slots_t_v slots) in hash_map_t_base_inv ntable /\ length al <= usize_max /\ assoc_list_inv al /\ // The table is empty hash_map_t_len_s ntable = 0 /\ (forall (k:key). hash_map_t_find_s ntable k == None))) (ensures ( let al = flatten (slots_t_v slots) in match hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back t ntable slots 0, hash_map_move_elements_s_flat (hash_map_t_v ntable) al with | Return (ntable', _), Return ntable'_v -> // The invariant is preserved hash_map_t_base_inv ntable' /\ // We preserved the parameters hash_map_t_same_params ntable' ntable /\ // The table has the same number of slots length ntable'.hash_map_slots = length ntable.hash_map_slots /\ // The count is good hash_map_t_len_s ntable' = length al /\ // The table can be linked to its model (we need this only to reveal // "pretty" functional lemmas to the user in the fsti - so that we // can write lemmas with SMT patterns - this is very F* specific) hash_map_t_v ntable' == ntable'_v /\ // The new table contains exactly all the bindings from the slots // Rk.: see the comment for [hash_map_is_assoc_list] hash_map_is_assoc_list ntable' al | _ -> False // We can only succeed )) // Weird, dirty things happen below. // Manually unfolding some postconditions allowed to make the proof pass, // and also revealed the reason why some proofs failed with "Unknown assertion // failed" (resulting in the call to [flatten_0_is_flatten] for instance). // I think manually unfolding the postconditions allowed to account for the // lack of ifuel (this kind of proofs is annoying, really). #restart-solver #push-options "--z3rlimit 100" let hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back_lem t ntable slots = let ntable_v = hash_map_t_v ntable in let slots_v = slots_t_v slots in let al = flatten slots_v in hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back_lem_refin t ntable slots 0; begin match hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back t ntable slots 0, hash_map_move_elements_s ntable_v slots_v 0 with | Fail _, Fail _ -> () | Return (ntable', _), Return ntable'_v -> assert(hash_map_t_base_inv ntable'); assert(hash_map_t_v ntable' == ntable'_v) | _ -> assert(False) end; hash_map_move_elements_s_lem_refin_flat ntable_v slots_v 0; begin match hash_map_move_elements_s ntable_v slots_v 0, hash_map_move_elements_s_flat ntable_v (flatten_i slots_v 0) with | Fail _, Fail _ -> () | Return hm, Return hm' -> assert(hm == hm') | _ -> assert(False) end; flatten_0_is_flatten slots_v; // flatten_i slots_v 0 == flatten slots_v hash_map_move_elements_s_flat_lem ntable_v al; match hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back t ntable slots 0, hash_map_move_elements_s_flat ntable_v al with | Return (ntable', _), Return ntable'_v -> assert(hash_map_t_base_inv ntable'); assert(length ntable'.hash_map_slots = length ntable.hash_map_slots); assert(hash_map_t_len_s ntable' = length al); assert(hash_map_t_v ntable' == ntable'_v); assert(hash_map_is_assoc_list ntable' al) | _ -> assert(False) #pop-options (*** try_resize *) /// High-level model 1. /// This is one is slightly "crude": we just simplify a bit the function. let hash_map_try_resize_s_simpl (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) : Pure (result (hash_map_t t)) (requires ( let (divid, divis) = hm.hash_map_max_load_factor in divid > 0 /\ divis > 0)) (ensures (fun _ -> True)) = let capacity = length hm.hash_map_slots in let (divid, divis) = hm.hash_map_max_load_factor in if capacity <= (usize_max / 2) / divid then let ncapacity : usize = capacity * 2 in begin match hash_map_new_with_capacity_fwd t ncapacity divid divis with | Fail e -> Fail e | Return ntable -> match hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back t ntable hm.hash_map_slots 0 with | Fail e -> Fail e | Return (ntable', _) -> let hm = { hm with hash_map_slots = ntable'.hash_map_slots; hash_map_max_load = ntable'.hash_map_max_load } in Return hm end else Return hm val hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem_refin (t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t t) : Lemma (requires ( let (divid, divis) = self.hash_map_max_load_factor in divid > 0 /\ divis > 0)) (ensures ( match hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back t self, hash_map_try_resize_s_simpl self with | Fail _, Fail _ -> True | Return hm1, Return hm2 -> hm1 == hm2 | _ -> False)) let hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem_refin t self = () /// Isolating arithmetic proofs let gt_lem0 (n m q : nat) : Lemma (requires (m > 0 /\ n > q)) (ensures (n * m > q * m)) = () let ge_lem0 (n m q : nat) : Lemma (requires (m > 0 /\ n >= q)) (ensures (n * m >= q * m)) = () let gt_ge_trans (n m p : nat) : Lemma (requires (n > m /\ m >= p)) (ensures (n > p)) = () let ge_trans (n m p : nat) : Lemma (requires (n >= m /\ m >= p)) (ensures (n >= p)) = () #push-options "--z3rlimit 200" let gt_lem1 (n m q : nat) : Lemma (requires (m > 0 /\ n > q / m)) (ensures (n * m > q)) = assert(n >= q / m + 1); ge_lem0 n m (q / m + 1); assert(n * m >= (q / m) * m + m) #pop-options let gt_lem2 (n m p q : nat) : Lemma (requires (m > 0 /\ p > 0 /\ n > (q / m) / p)) (ensures (n * m * p > q)) = gt_lem1 n p (q / m); assert(n * p > q / m); gt_lem1 (n * p) m q let ge_lem1 (n m q : nat) : Lemma (requires (n >= m /\ q > 0)) (ensures (n / q >= m / q)) = FStar.Math.Lemmas.lemma_div_le m n q #restart-solver #push-options "--z3rlimit 200" let times_divid_lem (n m p : pos) : Lemma ((n * m) / p >= n * (m / p)) = FStar.Math.Lemmas.multiply_fractions m p; assert(m >= (m / p) * p); assert(n * m >= n * (m / p) * p); // ge_lem1 (n * m) (n * (m / p) * p) p; assert((n * m) / p >= (n * (m / p) * p) / p); assert(n * (m / p) * p = (n * (m / p)) * p); FStar.Math.Lemmas.cancel_mul_div (n * (m / p)) p; assert(((n * (m / p)) * p) / p = n * (m / p)) #pop-options /// The good old arithmetic proofs and their unstability... /// At some point I thought it was stable because it worked with `--quake 100`. /// Of course, it broke the next time I checked the file... /// It seems things are ok when we check this proof on its own, but not when /// it is sent at the same time as the one above (though we put #restart-solver!). /// I also tried `--quake 1/100` to no avail: it seems that when Z3 decides to /// fail the first one, it fails them all. I inserted #restart-solver before /// the previous lemma to see if it had an effect (of course not). val new_max_load_lem (len : usize) (capacity : usize{capacity > 0}) (divid : usize{divid > 0}) (divis : usize{divis > 0}) : Lemma (requires ( let max_load = (capacity * divid) / divis in let ncapacity = 2 * capacity in let nmax_load = (ncapacity * divid) / divis in capacity > 0 /\ 0 < divid /\ divid < divis /\ capacity * divid >= divis /\ len = max_load + 1)) (ensures ( let max_load = (capacity * divid) / divis in let ncapacity = 2 * capacity in let nmax_load = (ncapacity * divid) / divis in len <= nmax_load)) let mul_assoc (a b c : nat) : Lemma (a * b * c == a * (b * c)) = () let ge_lem2 (a b c d : nat) : Lemma (requires (a >= b + c /\ c >= d)) (ensures (a >= b + d)) = () let ge_div_lem1 (a b : nat) : Lemma (requires (a >= b /\ b > 0)) (ensures (a / b >= 1)) = () #restart-solver #push-options "--z3rlimit 100 --z3cliopt smt.arith.nl=false" let new_max_load_lem len capacity divid divis = FStar.Math.Lemmas.paren_mul_left 2 capacity divid; mul_assoc 2 capacity divid; // The following assertion often breaks though it is given by the above // lemma. I really don't know what to do (I deactivated non-linear // arithmetic and added the previous lemma call, moved the assertion up, // boosted the rlimit...). assert(2 * capacity * divid == 2 * (capacity * divid)); let max_load = (capacity * divid) / divis in let ncapacity = 2 * capacity in let nmax_load = (ncapacity * divid) / divis in assert(nmax_load = (2 * capacity * divid) / divis); times_divid_lem 2 (capacity * divid) divis; assert((2 * (capacity * divid)) / divis >= 2 * ((capacity * divid) / divis)); assert(nmax_load >= 2 * ((capacity * divid) / divis)); assert(nmax_load >= 2 * max_load); assert(nmax_load >= max_load + max_load); ge_div_lem1 (capacity * divid) divis; ge_lem2 nmax_load max_load max_load 1; assert(nmax_load >= max_load + 1) #pop-options val hash_map_try_resize_s_simpl_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) : Lemma (requires ( // The base invariant is satisfied hash_map_t_base_inv hm /\ // However, the "full" invariant is broken, as we call [try_resize] // only if the current number of entries is > the max load. // // There are two situations: // - either we just reached the max load // - or we were already saturated and can't resize (let (dividend, divisor) = hm.hash_map_max_load_factor in hm.hash_map_num_entries == hm.hash_map_max_load + 1 \/ length hm.hash_map_slots * 2 * dividend > usize_max) )) (ensures ( match hash_map_try_resize_s_simpl hm with | Fail _ -> False | Return hm' -> // The full invariant is now satisfied (the full invariant is "base // invariant" + the map is not overloaded (or can't be resized because // already too big) hash_map_t_inv hm' /\ // It contains the same bindings as the initial map (forall (k:key). hash_map_t_find_s hm' k == hash_map_t_find_s hm k))) #restart-solver #push-options "--z3rlimit 400" let hash_map_try_resize_s_simpl_lem #t hm = let capacity = length hm.hash_map_slots in let (divid, divis) = hm.hash_map_max_load_factor in if capacity <= (usize_max / 2) / divid then begin let ncapacity : usize = capacity * 2 in assert(ncapacity * divid <= usize_max); assert(hash_map_t_len_s hm = hm.hash_map_max_load + 1); new_max_load_lem (hash_map_t_len_s hm) capacity divid divis; hash_map_new_with_capacity_fwd_lem t ncapacity divid divis; match hash_map_new_with_capacity_fwd t ncapacity divid divis with | Fail _ -> () | Return ntable -> let slots = hm.hash_map_slots in let al = flatten (slots_t_v slots) in // Proving that: length al = hm.hash_map_num_entries assert(al == flatten (map slot_t_v slots)); assert(al == flatten (map list_t_v slots)); assert(hash_map_t_al_v hm == flatten (hash_map_t_v hm)); assert(hash_map_t_al_v hm == flatten (map list_t_v hm.hash_map_slots)); assert(al == hash_map_t_al_v hm); assert(hash_map_t_base_inv ntable); assert(length al = hm.hash_map_num_entries); assert(length al <= usize_max); hash_map_t_base_inv_implies_assoc_list_lem hm; assert(assoc_list_inv al); assert(hash_map_t_len_s ntable = 0); assert(forall (k:key). hash_map_t_find_s ntable k == None); hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back_lem t ntable hm.hash_map_slots; match hash_map_move_elements_fwd_back t ntable hm.hash_map_slots 0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return (ntable', _) -> hash_map_is_assoc_list_lem hm; assert(hash_map_is_assoc_list hm (hash_map_t_al_v hm)); let hm' = { hm with hash_map_slots = ntable'.hash_map_slots; hash_map_max_load = ntable'.hash_map_max_load } in assert(hash_map_t_base_inv ntable'); assert(hash_map_t_base_inv hm'); assert(hash_map_t_len_s hm' = hash_map_t_len_s hm); new_max_load_lem (hash_map_t_len_s hm') capacity divid divis; assert(hash_map_t_len_s hm' <= hm'.hash_map_max_load); // Requires a lemma assert(hash_map_t_inv hm') end else begin gt_lem2 capacity 2 divid usize_max; assert(capacity * 2 * divid > usize_max) end #pop-options let hash_map_t_same_bindings (#t : Type0) (hm hm' : hash_map_t_nes t) : Type0 = forall (k:key). hash_map_t_find_s hm k == hash_map_t_find_s hm' k /// The final lemma about [try_resize] val hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) : Lemma (requires ( hash_map_t_base_inv hm /\ // However, the "full" invariant is broken, as we call [try_resize] // only if the current number of entries is > the max load. // // There are two situations: // - either we just reached the max load // - or we were already saturated and can't resize (let (dividend, divisor) = hm.hash_map_max_load_factor in hm.hash_map_num_entries == hm.hash_map_max_load + 1 \/ length hm.hash_map_slots * 2 * dividend > usize_max))) (ensures ( match hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back t hm with | Fail _ -> False | Return hm' -> // The full invariant is now satisfied (the full invariant is "base // invariant" + the map is not overloaded (or can't be resized because // already too big) hash_map_t_inv hm' /\ // The length is the same hash_map_t_len_s hm' = hash_map_t_len_s hm /\ // It contains the same bindings as the initial map hash_map_t_same_bindings hm' hm)) let hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem #t hm = hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem_refin t hm; hash_map_try_resize_s_simpl_lem hm (*** insert *) /// The high-level model (very close to the original function: we don't need something /// very high level, just to clean it a bit) let hash_map_insert_s (#t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t t) (key : usize) (value : t) : result (hash_map_t t) = match hash_map_insert_no_resize_fwd_back t self key value with | Fail e -> Fail e | Return hm' -> if hash_map_t_len_s hm' > hm'.hash_map_max_load then hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back t hm' else Return hm' val hash_map_insert_fwd_back_lem_refin (t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t t) (key : usize) (value : t) : Lemma (requires True) (ensures ( match hash_map_insert_fwd_back t self key value, hash_map_insert_s self key value with | Fail _, Fail _ -> True | Return hm1, Return hm2 -> hm1 == hm2 | _ -> False)) let hash_map_insert_fwd_back_lem_refin t self key value = () /// Helper let hash_map_insert_fwd_back_bindings_lem (t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t_nes t) (key : usize) (value : t) (hm' hm'' : hash_map_t_nes t) : Lemma (requires ( hash_map_s_updated_binding (hash_map_t_v self) key (Some value) (hash_map_t_v hm') /\ hash_map_t_same_bindings hm' hm'')) (ensures ( hash_map_s_updated_binding (hash_map_t_v self) key (Some value) (hash_map_t_v hm''))) = () val hash_map_insert_fwd_back_lem_aux (#t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t t) (key : usize) (value : t) : Lemma (requires (hash_map_t_inv self)) (ensures ( match hash_map_insert_fwd_back t self key value with | Fail _ -> // We can fail only if: // - the key is not in the map and we need to add it // - we are already saturated hash_map_t_len_s self = usize_max /\ None? (hash_map_t_find_s self key) | Return hm' -> // The invariant is preserved hash_map_t_inv hm' /\ // [key] maps to [value] and the other bindings are preserved hash_map_s_updated_binding (hash_map_t_v self) key (Some value) (hash_map_t_v hm') /\ // The length is incremented, iff we inserted a new key (match hash_map_t_find_s self key with | None -> hash_map_t_len_s hm' = hash_map_t_len_s self + 1 | Some _ -> hash_map_t_len_s hm' = hash_map_t_len_s self))) #restart-solver #push-options "--z3rlimit 200" let hash_map_insert_fwd_back_lem_aux #t self key value = hash_map_insert_no_resize_fwd_back_lem_s t self key value; hash_map_insert_no_resize_s_lem (hash_map_t_v self) key value; match hash_map_insert_no_resize_fwd_back t self key value with | Fail _ -> () | Return hm' -> // Expanding the post of [hash_map_insert_no_resize_fwd_back_lem_s] let self_v = hash_map_t_v self in let hm'_v = Return?.v (hash_map_insert_no_resize_s self_v key value) in assert(hash_map_t_base_inv hm'); assert(hash_map_t_same_params hm' self); assert(hash_map_t_v hm' == hm'_v); assert(hash_map_s_len hm'_v == hash_map_t_len_s hm'); // Expanding the post of [hash_map_insert_no_resize_s_lem] assert(insert_post self_v key value hm'_v); // Expanding [insert_post] assert(hash_map_s_inv hm'_v); assert( match hash_map_s_find self_v key with | None -> hash_map_s_len hm'_v = hash_map_s_len self_v + 1 | Some _ -> hash_map_s_len hm'_v = hash_map_s_len self_v); if hash_map_t_len_s hm' > hm'.hash_map_max_load then begin hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem hm'; // Expanding the post of [hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back_lem] let hm'' = Return?.v (hash_map_try_resize_fwd_back t hm') in assert(hash_map_t_inv hm''); let hm''_v = hash_map_t_v hm'' in assert(forall k. hash_map_t_find_s hm'' k == hash_map_t_find_s hm' k); assert(hash_map_t_len_s hm'' = hash_map_t_len_s hm'); // TODO // Proving the post assert(hash_map_t_inv hm''); hash_map_insert_fwd_back_bindings_lem t self key value hm' hm''; assert( match hash_map_t_find_s self key with | None -> hash_map_t_len_s hm'' = hash_map_t_len_s self + 1 | Some _ -> hash_map_t_len_s hm'' = hash_map_t_len_s self) end else () #pop-options let hash_map_insert_fwd_back_lem #t self key value = hash_map_insert_fwd_back_lem_aux #t self key value (*** contains_key *) (**** contains_key_in_list *) val hash_map_contains_key_in_list_fwd_lem (#t : Type0) (key : usize) (ls : list_t t) : Lemma (ensures ( match hash_map_contains_key_in_list_fwd t key ls with | Fail _ -> False | Return b -> b = Some? (slot_t_find_s key ls))) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_contains_key_in_list_fwd_lem #t key ls = match ls with | ListCons ckey x ls0 -> let b = ckey = key in if b then () else begin hash_map_contains_key_in_list_fwd_lem key ls0; match hash_map_contains_key_in_list_fwd t key ls0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return b0 -> () end | ListNil -> () #pop-options (**** contains_key *) val hash_map_contains_key_fwd_lem_aux (#t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t_nes t) (key : usize) : Lemma (ensures ( match hash_map_contains_key_fwd t self key with | Fail _ -> False | Return b -> b = Some? (hash_map_t_find_s self key))) let hash_map_contains_key_fwd_lem_aux #t self key = begin match hash_key_fwd key with | Fail _ -> () | Return i -> let v = self.hash_map_slots in let i0 = vec_len (list_t t) v in begin match usize_rem i i0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return hash_mod -> begin match vec_index_fwd (list_t t) v hash_mod with | Fail _ -> () | Return l -> hash_map_contains_key_in_list_fwd_lem key l; begin match hash_map_contains_key_in_list_fwd t key l with | Fail _ -> () | Return b -> () end end end end /// The lemma in the .fsti let hash_map_contains_key_fwd_lem #t self key = hash_map_contains_key_fwd_lem_aux #t self key (*** get *) (**** get_in_list *) val hash_map_get_in_list_fwd_lem (#t : Type0) (key : usize) (ls : list_t t) : Lemma (ensures ( match hash_map_get_in_list_fwd t key ls, slot_t_find_s key ls with | Fail _, None -> True | Return x, Some x' -> x == x' | _ -> False)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_get_in_list_fwd_lem #t key ls = begin match ls with | ListCons ckey cvalue ls0 -> let b = ckey = key in if b then () else begin hash_map_get_in_list_fwd_lem key ls0; match hash_map_get_in_list_fwd t key ls0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return x -> () end | ListNil -> () end #pop-options (**** get *) val hash_map_get_fwd_lem_aux (#t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t_nes t) (key : usize) : Lemma (ensures ( match hash_map_get_fwd t self key, hash_map_t_find_s self key with | Fail _, None -> True | Return x, Some x' -> x == x' | _ -> False)) let hash_map_get_fwd_lem_aux #t self key = begin match hash_key_fwd key with | Fail _ -> () | Return i -> let v = self.hash_map_slots in let i0 = vec_len (list_t t) v in begin match usize_rem i i0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return hash_mod -> begin match vec_index_fwd (list_t t) v hash_mod with | Fail _ -> () | Return l -> begin hash_map_get_in_list_fwd_lem key l; match hash_map_get_in_list_fwd t key l with | Fail _ -> () | Return x -> () end end end end /// .fsti let hash_map_get_fwd_lem #t self key = hash_map_get_fwd_lem_aux #t self key (*** get_mut'fwd *) (**** get_mut_in_list'fwd *) val hash_map_get_mut_in_list_fwd_lem (#t : Type0) (key : usize) (ls : list_t t) : Lemma (ensures ( match hash_map_get_mut_in_list_fwd t key ls, slot_t_find_s key ls with | Fail _, None -> True | Return x, Some x' -> x == x' | _ -> False)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_get_mut_in_list_fwd_lem #t key ls = begin match ls with | ListCons ckey cvalue ls0 -> let b = ckey = key in if b then () else begin hash_map_get_mut_in_list_fwd_lem key ls0; match hash_map_get_mut_in_list_fwd t key ls0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return x -> () end | ListNil -> () end #pop-options (**** get_mut'fwd *) val hash_map_get_mut_fwd_lem_aux (#t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t_nes t) (key : usize) : Lemma (ensures ( match hash_map_get_mut_fwd t self key, hash_map_t_find_s self key with | Fail _, None -> True | Return x, Some x' -> x == x' | _ -> False)) let hash_map_get_mut_fwd_lem_aux #t self key = begin match hash_key_fwd key with | Fail _ -> () | Return i -> let v = self.hash_map_slots in let i0 = vec_len (list_t t) v in begin match usize_rem i i0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return hash_mod -> begin match vec_index_fwd (list_t t) v hash_mod with | Fail _ -> () | Return l -> begin hash_map_get_mut_in_list_fwd_lem key l; match hash_map_get_mut_in_list_fwd t key l with | Fail _ -> () | Return x -> () end end end end let hash_map_get_mut_fwd_lem #t self key = hash_map_get_mut_fwd_lem_aux #t self key (*** get_mut'back *) (**** get_mut_in_list'back *) val hash_map_get_mut_in_list_back_lem (#t : Type0) (key : usize) (ls : list_t t) (ret : t) : Lemma (requires (Some? (slot_t_find_s key ls))) (ensures ( match hash_map_get_mut_in_list_back t key ls ret with | Fail _ -> False | Return ls' -> list_t_v ls' == find_update (same_key key) (list_t_v ls) (key,ret) | _ -> False)) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_get_mut_in_list_back_lem #t key ls ret = begin match ls with | ListCons ckey cvalue ls0 -> let b = ckey = key in if b then let ls1 = ListCons ckey ret ls0 in () else begin hash_map_get_mut_in_list_back_lem key ls0 ret; match hash_map_get_mut_in_list_back t key ls0 ret with | Fail _ -> () | Return l -> let ls1 = ListCons ckey cvalue l in () end | ListNil -> () end #pop-options (**** get_mut'back *) /// Refinement lemma val hash_map_get_mut_back_lem_refin (#t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t t{length self.hash_map_slots > 0}) (key : usize) (ret : t) : Lemma (requires (Some? (hash_map_t_find_s self key))) (ensures ( match hash_map_get_mut_back t self key ret with | Fail _ -> False | Return hm' -> hash_map_t_v hm' == hash_map_insert_no_fail_s (hash_map_t_v self) key ret)) let hash_map_get_mut_back_lem_refin #t self key ret = begin match hash_key_fwd key with | Fail _ -> () | Return i -> let i0 = self.hash_map_num_entries in let p = self.hash_map_max_load_factor in let i1 = self.hash_map_max_load in let v = self.hash_map_slots in let i2 = vec_len (list_t t) v in begin match usize_rem i i2 with | Fail _ -> () | Return hash_mod -> begin match vec_index_mut_fwd (list_t t) v hash_mod with | Fail _ -> () | Return l -> begin hash_map_get_mut_in_list_back_lem key l ret; match hash_map_get_mut_in_list_back t key l ret with | Fail _ -> () | Return l0 -> begin match vec_index_mut_back (list_t t) v hash_mod l0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return v0 -> let self0 = Mkhash_map_t i0 p i1 v0 in () end end end end end /// Final lemma val hash_map_get_mut_back_lem_aux (#t : Type0) (hm : hash_map_t t) (key : usize) (ret : t) : Lemma (requires ( hash_map_t_inv hm /\ Some? (hash_map_t_find_s hm key))) (ensures ( match hash_map_get_mut_back t hm key ret with | Fail _ -> False | Return hm' -> // Functional spec hash_map_t_v hm' == hash_map_insert_no_fail_s (hash_map_t_v hm) key ret /\ // The invariant is preserved hash_map_t_inv hm' /\ // The length is preserved hash_map_t_len_s hm' = hash_map_t_len_s hm /\ // [key] maps to [value] hash_map_t_find_s hm' key == Some ret /\ // The other bindings are preserved (forall k'. k' <> key ==> hash_map_t_find_s hm' k' == hash_map_t_find_s hm k'))) let hash_map_get_mut_back_lem_aux #t hm key ret = let hm_v = hash_map_t_v hm in hash_map_get_mut_back_lem_refin hm key ret; match hash_map_get_mut_back t hm key ret with | Fail _ -> assert(False) | Return hm' -> hash_map_insert_no_fail_s_lem hm_v key ret /// .fsti let hash_map_get_mut_back_lem #t hm key ret = hash_map_get_mut_back_lem_aux hm key ret (*** remove'fwd *) val hash_map_remove_from_list_fwd_lem (#t : Type0) (key : usize) (ls : list_t t) : Lemma (ensures ( match hash_map_remove_from_list_fwd t key ls with | Fail _ -> False | Return opt_x -> opt_x == slot_t_find_s key ls /\ (Some? opt_x ==> length (slot_t_v ls) > 0))) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_remove_from_list_fwd_lem #t key ls = begin match ls with | ListCons ckey x tl -> let b = ckey = key in if b then let mv_ls = mem_replace_fwd (list_t t) (ListCons ckey x tl) ListNil in begin match mv_ls with | ListCons i cvalue tl0 -> () | ListNil -> () end else begin hash_map_remove_from_list_fwd_lem key tl; match hash_map_remove_from_list_fwd t key tl with | Fail _ -> () | Return opt -> () end | ListNil -> () end #pop-options val hash_map_remove_fwd_lem_aux (#t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t t) (key : usize) : Lemma (requires ( // We need the invariant to prove that upon decrementing the entries counter, // the counter doesn't become negative hash_map_t_inv self)) (ensures ( match hash_map_remove_fwd t self key with | Fail _ -> False | Return opt_x -> opt_x == hash_map_t_find_s self key)) let hash_map_remove_fwd_lem_aux #t self key = begin match hash_key_fwd key with | Fail _ -> () | Return i -> let i0 = self.hash_map_num_entries in let v = self.hash_map_slots in let i1 = vec_len (list_t t) v in begin match usize_rem i i1 with | Fail _ -> () | Return hash_mod -> begin match vec_index_mut_fwd (list_t t) v hash_mod with | Fail _ -> () | Return l -> begin hash_map_remove_from_list_fwd_lem key l; match hash_map_remove_from_list_fwd t key l with | Fail _ -> () | Return x -> begin match x with | None -> () | Some x0 -> begin assert(l == index v hash_mod); assert(length (list_t_v #t l) > 0); length_flatten_index (hash_map_t_v self) hash_mod; match usize_sub i0 1 with | Fail _ -> () | Return _ -> () end end end end end end /// .fsti let hash_map_remove_fwd_lem #t self key = hash_map_remove_fwd_lem_aux #t self key (*** remove'back *) (**** Refinement proofs *) /// High-level model for [remove_from_list'back] let hash_map_remove_from_list_s (#t : Type0) (key : usize) (ls : slot_s t) : slot_s t = filter_one (not_same_key key) ls /// Refinement lemma val hash_map_remove_from_list_back_lem_refin (#t : Type0) (key : usize) (ls : list_t t) : Lemma (ensures ( match hash_map_remove_from_list_back t key ls with | Fail _ -> False | Return ls' -> list_t_v ls' == hash_map_remove_from_list_s key (list_t_v ls) /\ // The length is decremented, iff the key was in the slot (let len = length (list_t_v ls) in let len' = length (list_t_v ls') in match slot_s_find key (list_t_v ls) with | None -> len = len' | Some _ -> len = len' + 1))) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_remove_from_list_back_lem_refin #t key ls = begin match ls with | ListCons ckey x tl -> let b = ckey = key in if b then let mv_ls = mem_replace_fwd (list_t t) (ListCons ckey x tl) ListNil in begin match mv_ls with | ListCons i cvalue tl0 -> () | ListNil -> () end else begin hash_map_remove_from_list_back_lem_refin key tl; match hash_map_remove_from_list_back t key tl with | Fail _ -> () | Return l -> let ls0 = ListCons ckey x l in () end | ListNil -> () end #pop-options /// High-level model for [remove_from_list'back] let hash_map_remove_s (#t : Type0) (self : hash_map_s_nes t) (key : usize) : hash_map_s t = let len = length self in let hash = hash_mod_key key len in let slot = index self hash in let slot' = hash_map_remove_from_list_s key slot in list_update self hash slot' /// Refinement lemma val hash_map_remove_back_lem_refin (#t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t_nes t) (key : usize) : Lemma (requires ( // We need the invariant to prove that upon decrementing the entries counter, // the counter doesn't become negative hash_map_t_inv self)) (ensures ( match hash_map_remove_back t self key with | Fail _ -> False | Return hm' -> hash_map_t_same_params hm' self /\ hash_map_t_v hm' == hash_map_remove_s (hash_map_t_v self) key /\ // The length is decremented iff the key was in the map (let len = hash_map_t_len_s self in let len' = hash_map_t_len_s hm' in match hash_map_t_find_s self key with | None -> len = len' | Some _ -> len = len' + 1))) let hash_map_remove_back_lem_refin #t self key = begin match hash_key_fwd key with | Fail _ -> () | Return i -> let i0 = self.hash_map_num_entries in let p = self.hash_map_max_load_factor in let i1 = self.hash_map_max_load in let v = self.hash_map_slots in let i2 = vec_len (list_t t) v in begin match usize_rem i i2 with | Fail _ -> () | Return hash_mod -> begin match vec_index_mut_fwd (list_t t) v hash_mod with | Fail _ -> () | Return l -> begin hash_map_remove_from_list_fwd_lem key l; match hash_map_remove_from_list_fwd t key l with | Fail _ -> () | Return x -> begin match x with | None -> begin hash_map_remove_from_list_back_lem_refin key l; match hash_map_remove_from_list_back t key l with | Fail _ -> () | Return l0 -> begin length_flatten_update (slots_t_v v) hash_mod (list_t_v l0); match vec_index_mut_back (list_t t) v hash_mod l0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return v0 -> () end end | Some x0 -> begin assert(l == index v hash_mod); assert(length (list_t_v #t l) > 0); length_flatten_index (hash_map_t_v self) hash_mod; match usize_sub i0 1 with | Fail _ -> () | Return i3 -> begin hash_map_remove_from_list_back_lem_refin key l; match hash_map_remove_from_list_back t key l with | Fail _ -> () | Return l0 -> begin length_flatten_update (slots_t_v v) hash_mod (list_t_v l0); match vec_index_mut_back (list_t t) v hash_mod l0 with | Fail _ -> () | Return v0 -> () end end end end end end end end (**** Invariants, high-level properties *) val hash_map_remove_from_list_s_lem (#t : Type0) (k : usize) (slot : slot_s t) (len : usize{len > 0}) (i : usize) : Lemma (requires (slot_s_inv len i slot)) (ensures ( let slot' = hash_map_remove_from_list_s k slot in slot_s_inv len i slot' /\ slot_s_find k slot' == None /\ (forall (k':key{k' <> k}). slot_s_find k' slot' == slot_s_find k' slot) /\ // This postcondition is necessary to prove that the invariant is preserved // in the recursive calls. This allows us to do the proof in one go. (forall (b:binding t). for_all (binding_neq b) slot ==> for_all (binding_neq b) slot') )) #push-options "--fuel 1" let rec hash_map_remove_from_list_s_lem #t key slot len i = match slot with | [] -> () | (k',v) :: slot' -> if k' <> key then begin hash_map_remove_from_list_s_lem key slot' len i; let slot'' = hash_map_remove_from_list_s key slot' in assert(for_all (same_hash_mod_key len i) ((k',v)::slot'')); assert(for_all (binding_neq (k',v)) slot'); // Triggers instanciation assert(for_all (binding_neq (k',v)) slot'') end else begin assert(for_all (binding_neq (k',v)) slot'); for_all_binding_neq_find_lem key v slot' end #pop-options val hash_map_remove_s_lem (#t : Type0) (self : hash_map_s_nes t) (key : usize) : Lemma (requires (hash_map_s_inv self)) (ensures ( let hm' = hash_map_remove_s self key in // The invariant is preserved hash_map_s_inv hm' /\ // We updated the binding hash_map_s_updated_binding self key None hm')) let hash_map_remove_s_lem #t self key = let len = length self in let hash = hash_mod_key key len in let slot = index self hash in hash_map_remove_from_list_s_lem key slot len hash; let slot' = hash_map_remove_from_list_s key slot in let hm' = list_update self hash slot' in assert(hash_map_s_inv self) /// Final lemma about [remove'back] val hash_map_remove_back_lem_aux (#t : Type0) (self : hash_map_t t) (key : usize) : Lemma (requires (hash_map_t_inv self)) (ensures ( match hash_map_remove_back t self key with | Fail _ -> False | Return hm' -> hash_map_t_inv self /\ hash_map_t_same_params hm' self /\ // We updated the binding hash_map_s_updated_binding (hash_map_t_v self) key None (hash_map_t_v hm') /\ hash_map_t_v hm' == hash_map_remove_s (hash_map_t_v self) key /\ // The length is decremented iff the key was in the map (let len = hash_map_t_len_s self in let len' = hash_map_t_len_s hm' in match hash_map_t_find_s self key with | None -> len = len' | Some _ -> len = len' + 1))) let hash_map_remove_back_lem_aux #t self key = hash_map_remove_back_lem_refin self key; hash_map_remove_s_lem (hash_map_t_v self) key /// .fsti let hash_map_remove_back_lem #t self key = hash_map_remove_back_lem_aux #t self key