From 10a77d17ea06b732106348588bedc6a89766d56f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Son Ho Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:31:43 +0100 Subject: Reactivate the sanity checks for the progress tactic --- backends/lean/Base/Progress/Base.lean | 40 +++++++++++++------------------ backends/lean/Base/Progress/Progress.lean | 4 +--- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) (limited to 'backends/lean/Base/Progress') diff --git a/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Base.lean b/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Base.lean index d50c357c..a72cd641 100644 --- a/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Base.lean +++ b/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Base.lean @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ def mkDiscrTreeExtention [Inhabited α] [BEq α] (name : Name := by exact decl_n structure PSpecDesc where -- The universally quantified variables + -- Can be fvars or mvars fvars : Array Expr -- The existentially quantified variables evars : Array Expr @@ -50,8 +51,6 @@ structure PSpecDesc where -- The function arguments fLevels : List Level args : Array Expr - -- The universally quantified variables which appear in the function arguments - argsFVars : Array FVarId -- The returned value ret : Expr -- The postcondition (if there is) @@ -82,7 +81,7 @@ section Methods TODO: generalize for when we do inductive proofs -/ partial - def withPSpec [Inhabited (m a)] [Nonempty (m a)] (sanityChecks : Bool := false) + def withPSpec [Inhabited (m a)] [Nonempty (m a)] (isGoal : Bool) (th : Expr) (k : PSpecDesc → m a) : m a := do trace[Progress] "Proposition: {th}" @@ -120,19 +119,18 @@ section Methods else pure (mExpr, mf, margs) trace[Progress] "After stripping the arguments of the function call:\n- f: {f}\n- args: {args}" if ¬ f.isConst then throwError "Not a constant: {f}" - -- Compute the set of universally quantified variables which appear in the function arguments - let allArgsFVars ← args.foldlM (fun hs arg => getFVarIds arg hs) HashSet.empty - -- Sanity check - if sanityChecks then - -- All the variables which appear in the inputs given to the function are - -- universally quantified (in particular, they are not *existentially* quantified) - let fvarsSet : HashSet FVarId := HashSet.ofArray (fvars.map (fun x => x.fvarId!)) - let filtArgsFVars := allArgsFVars.toArray.filter (fun fvar => ¬ fvarsSet.contains fvar) - if ¬ filtArgsFVars.isEmpty then + -- *Sanity check* (activated if we are analyzing a theorem to register it in a DB) + -- Check if some existentially quantified variables + let _ := do + -- Collect all the free variables in the arguments + let allArgsFVars := ← args.foldlM (fun hs arg => getFVarIds arg hs) HashSet.empty + -- Check if they intersect the fvars we introduced for the existentially quantified variables + let evarsSet : HashSet FVarId := HashSet.ofArray (evars.map (fun (x : Expr) => x.fvarId!)) + let filtArgsFVars := allArgsFVars.toArray.filter (fun var => evarsSet.contains var) + if filtArgsFVars.isEmpty then pure () + else let filtArgsFVars := filtArgsFVars.map (fun fvarId => Expr.fvar fvarId) throwError "Some of the function inputs are not universally quantified: {filtArgsFVars}" - let argsFVars := fvars.map (fun x => x.fvarId!) - let argsFVars := argsFVars.filter (fun fvar => allArgsFVars.contains fvar) -- Return trace[Progress] "Function with arguments: {fArgsExpr}"; let thDesc := { @@ -142,7 +140,6 @@ section Methods fName := f.constName! fLevels := f.constLevels! args := args - argsFVars ret := ret post := post } @@ -150,11 +147,8 @@ section Methods end Methods -/-def getPSpecFunArgsExpr (th : Expr) : MetaM Expr := - withPSpec true th (fun d => do pure d.fArgsExpr) - -def getPSpecFunName (th : Expr) : MetaM Name := - withPSpec true th (fun d => do pure d.fName)-/ +def getPSpecFunArgsExpr (isGoal : Bool) (th : Expr) : MetaM Expr := + withPSpec isGoal th (fun d => do pure d.fArgsExpr) -- pspec attribute structure PSpecAttr where @@ -176,14 +170,14 @@ initialize pspecAttr : PSpecAttr ← do -- Lookup the theorem let env ← getEnv let thDecl := env.constants.find! thName - let isGoal := false - let fKey ← MetaM.run' (withPSpec true isGoal thDecl.type fun d => do - let fExpr := d.fArgsExpr + let fKey ← MetaM.run' (do + let fExpr ← getPSpecFunArgsExpr false thDecl.type trace[Progress] "Registering spec theorem for {fExpr}" -- Convert the function expression to a discrimination tree key DiscrTree.mkPath fExpr) let env := ext.addEntry env (fKey, thName) setEnv env + trace[Progress] "Saved the environment" pure () } registerBuiltinAttribute attrImpl diff --git a/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Progress.lean b/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Progress.lean index 93b7d7d5..a6a4e82a 100644 --- a/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Progress.lean +++ b/backends/lean/Base/Progress/Progress.lean @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ def progressAsmsOrLookupTheorem (keep : Option Name) (withTh : Option TheoremOrL -- have the proper shape. let fExpr ← do let isGoal := true - withPSpec false isGoal goalTy fun desc => do + withPSpec isGoal goalTy fun desc => do let fExpr := desc.fArgsExpr trace[Progress] "Expression to match: {fExpr}" pure fExpr @@ -386,8 +386,6 @@ namespace Test progress keep _ as ⟨ z, h1 .. ⟩ simp [*, h1] - set_option trace.Progress false - example {ty} {x y : Scalar ty} (hmin : Scalar.min ty ≤ x.val + y.val) (hmax : x.val + y.val ≤ Scalar.max ty) : -- cgit v1.2.3