From f4f468878fc0459a806b02cdf8921af6fcac2759 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josh Chen Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 11:47:30 +0200 Subject: Tweak proof methods, some type rules; add HoTT Book examples --- ex/HoTT Book/Ch1.thy | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+) create mode 100644 ex/HoTT Book/Ch1.thy (limited to 'ex/HoTT Book') diff --git a/ex/HoTT Book/Ch1.thy b/ex/HoTT Book/Ch1.thy new file mode 100644 index 0000000..84a5cf4 --- /dev/null +++ b/ex/HoTT Book/Ch1.thy @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +theory Ch1 + imports "../../HoTT" +begin + +chapter \HoTT Book, Chapter 1\ + +section \1.6 Dependent pair types (\-types)\ + +text "Prove that the only inhabitants of the \-type are those given by the pair constructor." + +schematic_goal + assumes "(\x:A. B(x)): U(i)" and "p: \x:A. B(x)" + shows "?a: p =[\x:A. B(x)] " + +text "Proof by induction on \p: \x:A. B(x)\:" + +proof (rule Sum_elim[where ?p=p]) + text "We just need to prove the base case; the rest will be taken care of automatically." + + fix x y assume asm: "x: A" "y: B(x)" show + "refl(): =[\x:A. B(x)] , snd >" + proof (subst (0 1) comp) + text " + The computation rules for \fst\ and \snd\ require that \x\ and \y\ have appropriate types. + The automatic proof methods have trouble picking the appropriate types, so we state them explicitly, + " + show "x: A" and "y: B(x)" by (fact asm)+ + + text "...twice, once each for the substitutions of \fst\ and \snd\." + show "x: A" and "y: B(x)" by (fact asm)+ + + qed (derive lems: assms asm) + +qed (derive lems: assms) + + +end \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.3