From 593faab277de53cbe2cb0c2feca5de307d9334ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josh Chen
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2018 00:11:39 +0200
Subject: Reorganize code

---
 Equal.thy | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Equal.thy

(limited to 'Equal.thy')

diff --git a/Equal.thy b/Equal.thy
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b9f676f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Equal.thy
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+theory Equal
+  imports HoTT_Base Prod
+
+begin
+
+subsection \<open>Equality type\<close>
+  
+    axiomatization
+      Equal :: "[Term, Term, Term] \<Rightarrow> Term"
+
+    syntax
+      "_EQUAL" :: "[Term, Term, Term] \<Rightarrow> Term"        ("(3_ =\<^sub>_/ _)" [101, 101] 100)
+      "_EQUAL_ASCII" :: "[Term, Term, Term] \<Rightarrow> Term"  ("(3_ =[_]/ _)" [101, 0, 101] 100)
+    translations
+      "a =[A] b" \<rightleftharpoons> "CONST Equal A a b"
+      "a =\<^sub>A b" \<rightharpoonup> "CONST Equal A a b"
+    
+    axiomatization
+      refl :: "Term \<Rightarrow> Term"  ("(refl'(_'))") and
+      indEqual :: "[Term, [Term, Term, Term] \<Rightarrow> Term] \<Rightarrow> Term"  ("(indEqual[_])")
+    where
+      Equal_form: "\<And>A a b::Term. \<lbrakk>A : U; a : A; b : A\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> a =\<^sub>A b : U"
+      (* Should I write a permuted version \<open>\<lbrakk>A : U; b : A; a : A\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<dots>\<close>? *)
+    and
+      Equal_intro [intro]: "\<And>A x::Term. x : A \<Longrightarrow> refl(x) : x =\<^sub>A x"
+    and
+      Equal_elim [elim]:
+        "\<And>(A::Term) (C::[Term, Term, Term] \<Rightarrow> Term) (f::Term) (a::Term) (b::Term) (p::Term).
+          \<lbrakk> \<And>x y::Term. \<lbrakk>x : A; y : A\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> C(x)(y): x =\<^sub>A y \<rightarrow> U;
+            f : \<Prod>x:A. C(x)(x)(refl(x));
+            a : A;
+            b : A;
+            p : a =\<^sub>A b \<rbrakk>
+        \<Longrightarrow> indEqual[A](C)`f`a`b`p : C(a)(b)(p)"
+    and
+      Equal_comp [simp]:
+        "\<And>(A::Term) (C::[Term, Term, Term] \<Rightarrow> Term) (f::Term) (a::Term). indEqual[A](C)`f`a`a`refl(a) \<equiv> f`a"
+    
+    lemmas Equal_formation [intro] = Equal_form Equal_form[rotated 1] Equal_form[rotated 2]
+    
+    subsubsection \<open>Properties of equality\<close>
+    
+    text "Symmetry/Path inverse"
+    
+    definition inv :: "[Term, Term, Term] \<Rightarrow> Term"  ("(1inv[_,/ _,/ _])")
+      where "inv[A,x,y] \<equiv> indEqual[A](\<lambda>x y _. y =\<^sub>A x)`(\<^bold>\<lambda>x:A. refl(x))`x`y"
+    
+    lemma inv_comp: "\<And>A a::Term. a : A \<Longrightarrow> inv[A,a,a]`refl(a) \<equiv> refl(a)" unfolding inv_def by simp
+    
+    text "Transitivity/Path composition"
+    
+    \<comment> \<open>"Raw" composition function\<close>
+    definition compose' :: "Term \<Rightarrow> Term"  ("(1compose''[_])")
+      where "compose'[A] \<equiv> indEqual[A](\<lambda>x y _. \<Prod>z:A. \<Prod>q: y =\<^sub>A z. x =\<^sub>A z)`(indEqual[A](\<lambda>x z _. x =\<^sub>A z)`(\<^bold>\<lambda>x:A. refl(x)))"
+    
+    \<comment> \<open>"Natural" composition function\<close>
+    abbreviation compose :: "[Term, Term, Term, Term] \<Rightarrow> Term"  ("(1compose[_,/ _,/ _,/ _])")
+      where "compose[A,x,y,z] \<equiv> \<^bold>\<lambda>p:x =\<^sub>A y. \<^bold>\<lambda>q:y =\<^sub>A z. compose'[A]`x`y`p`z`q"
+    
+    (**** GOOD CANDIDATE FOR AUTOMATION ****)
+    lemma compose_comp:
+      assumes "a : A"
+      shows "compose[A,a,a,a]`refl(a)`refl(a) \<equiv> refl(a)" using assms Equal_intro[OF assms] unfolding compose'_def by simp
+    
+    text "The above proof is a good candidate for proof automation; in particular we would like the system to be able to automatically find the conditions of the \<open>using\<close> clause in the proof.
+    This would likely involve something like:
+      1. Recognizing that there is a function application that can be simplified.
+      2. Noting that the obstruction to applying \<open>Prod_comp\<close> is the requirement that \<open>refl(a) : a =\<^sub>A a\<close>.
+      3. Obtaining such a condition, using the known fact \<open>a : A\<close> and the introduction rule \<open>Equal_intro\<close>."
+    
+    lemmas Equal_simps [simp] = inv_comp compose_comp
+    
+    subsubsection \<open>Pretty printing\<close>
+    
+    abbreviation inv_pretty :: "[Term, Term, Term, Term] \<Rightarrow> Term"  ("(1_\<^sup>-\<^sup>1[_, _, _])" 500)
+      where "p\<^sup>-\<^sup>1[A,x,y] \<equiv> inv[A,x,y]`p"
+    
+    abbreviation compose_pretty :: "[Term, Term, Term, Term, Term, Term] \<Rightarrow> Term"  ("(1_ \<bullet>[_, _, _, _]/ _)")
+      where "p \<bullet>[A,x,y,z] q \<equiv> compose[A,x,y,z]`p`q"
+
+end
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
cgit v1.2.3