From 41f13f91d023e497d9b35e7a958a961aa0c7a5e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josh Chen Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 14:34:08 +0200 Subject: Misc formatting --- ProdProps.thy | 1 - ex/HoTT book/Ch1.thy | 2 +- ex/Synthesis.thy | 2 +- 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/ProdProps.thy b/ProdProps.thy index 7071b39..adadb29 100644 --- a/ProdProps.thy +++ b/ProdProps.thy @@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ text " lemma compose_assoc: assumes "A: U(i)" and "f: A \ B" "g: B \ C" "h: \x:C. D(x)" shows "(h \ g) \ f \ h \ (g \ f)" - proof (subst (0 1 2 3) compose_def) show "\<^bold>\x. (\<^bold>\y. h`(g`y))`(f`x) \ \<^bold>\x. h`((\<^bold>\y. g`(f`y))`x)" proof (subst Prod_eq) diff --git a/ex/HoTT book/Ch1.thy b/ex/HoTT book/Ch1.thy index 65de875..cc0adf5 100644 --- a/ex/HoTT book/Ch1.thy +++ b/ex/HoTT book/Ch1.thy @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ chapter \HoTT Book, Chapter 1\ section \1.6 Dependent pair types (\-types)\ -text "Prove that the only inhabitants of the \-type are those given by the pair constructor." +text "Propositional uniqueness principle:" schematic_goal assumes "(\x:A. B(x)): U(i)" and "p: \x:A. B(x)" diff --git a/ex/Synthesis.thy b/ex/Synthesis.thy index cd5c4e1..e5a8ecf 100644 --- a/ex/Synthesis.thy +++ b/ex/Synthesis.thy @@ -76,4 +76,4 @@ theorem by (simple lems: pred_welltyped pred_type pred_props) -end \ No newline at end of file +end -- cgit v1.2.3